Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,918 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 743,060
Pageviews Today: 987,481Threads Today: 267Posts Today: 3,989
08:33 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69729052
Switzerland
07/10/2015 02:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World
Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World

By Paul Craig Roberts

July 10, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - The Pentagon has released its “National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015,” June 2015.

The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to “state actors” that “are challenging international norms.” It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washington’s policies. These “revisionist states” are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent.

Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them “revisionist states.” In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-Power doctrine that declares independent action to be the right of Washington alone. Washington’s History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions. By definition, a country with a foreign policy independent of Washington is a threat.

The Pentagon’s report defines the foremost “revisionist states” as Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. The focus is primarily on Russia. Washington hopes to co-op China, despite the “tension to the Asia-Pacific region” that China’s defense of its sphere of influence causes, a defense “inconsistent with international law” (this from Washington, the great violator of international law), by turning over what remains of the American consumer market to China. It is not yet certain that Iran has escaped the fate that Washington imposed on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Ukraine, and by complicity Palestine.

Continue to read:
[link to www.informationclearinghouse.info]





GLP