Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,495 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 254,235
Pageviews Today: 457,569Threads Today: 168Posts Today: 3,253
08:02 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?

 
The Laughing Cavalier
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 69495220
United Kingdom
07/20/2015 03:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
Just wondering what this new film will be like! Given the deservedly classic status of the first one, even though 2 fell some way behind, how do the fans feel it will measure up?
The world you know is just a sugar-coated topping; there is another world below it- the REAL world, and if you want to survive it, you'd better learn to pull the trigger!!! -BLADE
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69725011
United States
07/20/2015 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
3 obese feminazis drive around new york punishing the ghosts of dead white people.

Sure, it's going to be a megablockbuster...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55431899
United States
07/20/2015 04:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
Absolute crap making the cast all women.

Thor is female.
Captain America is now black.
Iceman has come out of the closet and is now a homosexual.

I would be MUCH happier if Hollyweird would quit repurposing old characters and just MAKE NEW ONES to fit their new agenda.

What's wrong? They don't stick?

Maybe it's because NOBODY CARES or WANTS it.

/sigh
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31095985
United Kingdom
07/20/2015 04:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
I heard that the third film was supposed to be set in hell. I think that would be pretty cool, although perhaps a bit grim for a comedy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 60583524
United States
07/20/2015 04:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
It is going to be full of PC garbage and will be total crap.
Exusiai

User ID: 34796448
United States
07/20/2015 04:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
I'm not holding my breath, but my money is on it being a flop. When I saw the cast I couldn't instantly start ID'ing who was the techie, the conspiracy/paranormal expert, the Sass, and the hesitant person there for the paycheck.

Ghostbusters is on that tier of classics that work because of the perfect confluence of people and period. Much like Back to the Future (which God help us all if they dare touch that one), a lot of what made it work was that they fit the culture so well. Now that we're all whinebaby PC underlings...could you really see the jokes getting worked in? I mean will Stay Puft be a white marshmallow or will it be a mixture of the rainbow ones?

Yep, I know, sounds stupid to me too, but it's just the level of stupidity we have surrounding us now.
The Laughing Cavalier  (OP)

User ID: 69495220
United Kingdom
07/20/2015 04:32 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
I agree. They're going to mess it all up. I didn't think the first one was TOO much of a comedy, as it dealt with some spine-chilling stuff when you stripped away the rib-tickling!
The world you know is just a sugar-coated topping; there is another world below it- the REAL world, and if you want to survive it, you'd better learn to pull the trigger!!! -BLADE
The Laughing Cavalier  (OP)

User ID: 69495220
United Kingdom
07/20/2015 04:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
I'm not holding my breath, but my money is on it being a flop. When I saw the cast I couldn't instantly start ID'ing who was the techie, the conspiracy/paranormal expert, the Sass, and the hesitant person there for the paycheck.

Ghostbusters is on that tier of classics that work because of the perfect confluence of people and period. Much like Back to the Future (which God help us all if they dare touch that one), a lot of what made it work was that they fit the culture so well. Now that we're all whinebaby PC underlings...could you really see the jokes getting worked in? I mean will Stay Puft be a white marshmallow or will it be a mixture of the rainbow ones?

Yep, I know, sounds stupid to me too, but it's just the level of stupidity we have surrounding us now.
 Quoting: Exusiai


I'm with you there! They should not tinker with what to me, and countless others, consider a bona-fide classic! I've got a feeling that Melissa Mccarthy, playing the Venkman-type role, will go completely over the top!
The world you know is just a sugar-coated topping; there is another world below it- the REAL world, and if you want to survive it, you'd better learn to pull the trigger!!! -BLADE
ShallowGravy

User ID: 70579022
United States
12/28/2015 06:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
bump

Last Edited by ShallowGravy on 12/28/2015 07:00 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57545781
United States
12/28/2015 07:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Ghostbusters 3. Waste of time, or quite acceptable?
Fuck that shit

agumballredface





GLP