Australia's Judy Carman, PhD on "Woefully Inadequate" GMO Testing | |
grumpier
User ID: 1189758 China 09/20/2015 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Instant Karma
(OP) User ID: 69469070 United States 09/20/2015 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
Instant Karma
(OP) User ID: 69469070 United States 09/20/2015 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The results were not good. The GMO fed female pigs had 25% heavier ovaries. (The males were neutered at 3 days, so their reproductive systems were not evaluated.) Severe stomach inflammation was overall 2.6 times more likely in the GM fed pigs. 4 times more likely in males, 2.2 times more likely in the females. Yet the FDA still considers all GM foods to be substantially equivalent to conventional crops, therefore they require no safety testing in the US. Last Edited by Gimme Some Truth on 09/20/2015 10:26 PM Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
GFX guy
User ID: 66197238 United States 09/20/2015 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Instant Karma
(OP) User ID: 69469070 United States 09/20/2015 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She did a fully controlled double-blind GMO feeding study on pigs, due to their similar physiology to humans. Quoting: Instant Karma The results were not good. The GMO fed female pigs had 25% heavier ovaries. (The males were neutered at 3 days, so their reproductive systems were not evaluated.) Severe stomach inflammation was overall 2.6 times more likely in the GM fed pigs. 4 times more likely in males, 2.2 times more likely in the females. Yet the FDA still considers all GM foods to be substantially equivalent to conventional crops, therefore they require no safety testing in the US. The real reason they don't want to do adequate long term safety testing, is they know the results will be bad. Might get in the way of making a buck at the expense of the long term health of the human race. Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
GFX guy
User ID: 66197238 United States 09/20/2015 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She did a fully controlled double-blind GMO feeding study on pigs, due to their similar physiology to humans. Quoting: Instant Karma The results were not good. The GMO fed female pigs had 25% heavier ovaries. (The males were neutered at 3 days, so their reproductive systems were not evaluated.) Severe stomach inflammation was overall 2.6 times more likely in the GM fed pigs. 4 times more likely in males, 2.2 times more likely in the females. Yet the FDA still considers all GM foods to be substantially equivalent to conventional crops, therefore they require no safety testing in the US. The real reason they don't want to do adequate long term safety testing, is they know the results will be bad. Might get in the way of making a buck at the expense of the long term health of the human race. They goto great lengths to make sure testing cannot be done. Example: [link to www.scientificamerican.com] But agritech companies such as Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta go further. For a decade their user agreements have explicitly forbidden the use of the seeds for any independent research. Under the threat of litigation, scientists cannot test a seed to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails. They cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company. And perhaps most important, they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects. |
Instant Karma
(OP) User ID: 69469070 United States 09/20/2015 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She did a fully controlled double-blind GMO feeding study on pigs, due to their similar physiology to humans. Quoting: Instant Karma The results were not good. The GMO fed female pigs had 25% heavier ovaries. (The males were neutered at 3 days, so their reproductive systems were not evaluated.) Severe stomach inflammation was overall 2.6 times more likely in the GM fed pigs. 4 times more likely in males, 2.2 times more likely in the females. Yet the FDA still considers all GM foods to be substantially equivalent to conventional crops, therefore they require no safety testing in the US. The real reason they don't want to do adequate long term safety testing, is they know the results will be bad. Might get in the way of making a buck at the expense of the long term health of the human race. They goto great lengths to make sure testing cannot be done. Example: [link to www.scientificamerican.com] But agritech companies such as Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta go further. For a decade their user agreements have explicitly forbidden the use of the seeds for any independent research. Under the threat of litigation, scientists cannot test a seed to explore the different conditions under which it thrives or fails. They cannot compare seeds from one company against those from another company. And perhaps most important, they cannot examine whether the genetically modified crops lead to unintended environmental side effects. That's the advantage of feeding studies. They don't need any seeds to test, just the same GM corn and soy that farmers are already feeding to their livestock. Last Edited by Gimme Some Truth on 09/20/2015 10:44 PM Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
GFX guy
User ID: 66197238 United States 09/20/2015 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
GFX guy
User ID: 66197238 United States 09/21/2015 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Instant Karma
(OP) User ID: 69469070 United States 09/21/2015 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This has to be the first GMO thread in the history of the internet that didn't have an army of Monsanto shills invade within minutes of posting. Quoting: GFX guy The value of hard data perhaps..? Yep. If you can't debate the facts, ignore 'em. Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money: [link to www.webofdebt.com] ALTERED GENES, TWISTED TRUTH: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science, Corrupted Government, and Systematically Deceived the Public: [link to www.amazon.com] 2028 End? [link to 2028end.com] |
Epic Beard Guy
User ID: 26240425 United States 09/21/2015 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Monsanto is the devil, and they are doing their part to kill us all. 5* Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe |