Mad World

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Thread: STOCK MARKET DOW DOWN -545 > 2.12% Investors on SUICIDE WATCH!!


Don't move until you seeeeeee it.

One of the really interesting things about human nature is it makes all of us capable of anything one is able to do, with one exception of being you.

What is the point of defining the self when no one else could possibly understand the full scope of that definition?

Why a need to put the mirror into words?

hi seer
i didn't notice you asked to just now

just business is the phrase i am told in military circles and private sector market rates are competitive

budget convenience and political risk dictate the deal
i imagine

do you have thoughts

i don't think that word sequence goes anywhere deafcat

not sure how to interpret what is meant by 'goes anywhere''

it could go several places

hi deafcat
your example of one of the places will be helpful if you don't mind

as much as i'm compelled not to since it feels like a game, why not...

one of the possible interpretations that came to my mind ado with what you communicated to me was that what i wrote to no one in particular literally doesn't belong anywhere, that it holds no meaning for any one else besides myself and all of my attempts to communicate to others the ways in which i've found some semblance of peace at times in life are futile, a waste of time, and a failed effort to validate the delusion i can be a beneficial influence and create a difference in others' lives

hi deafcat
that is why i asked because i saw that similar meaning that you experience about yourself that fits your experience of everybody else and yourself to cause you to describe your emotional experience of life
it seemed

do I experience that similarity

yes and no and less and less as my own storyline of myself fits myself more comfortably over linear time caused by my constantly bridging the gap between me and other people on the topic of what are we and what are we within being ourself with other people similar to ourself but not ourself etc etc

compatible cooperation of similar motivated is the phrase
for people similar enough to be interested enough to consider meanings of compatible meaning for experiences shared frequently enough to be not coincides or random

thanks for replying

Last Edited by aether on 10/13/2018 01:00 PM

my comfort increases the wider the gap becomes

your comfort demands that is true my comfort is closer contact
you and me together in the one environmental experience within glp each of us of opposite motive yet we are talking comfortably and I enjoy your company

Port St. Joe and Mexico beach.

Hurricane Michael.
[link to i.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

[link to i.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]


[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

Thread: All Climbers Dead After Violent Storm Sweeps Himalayan Base Camp

Bill.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Thread: U.S. Secretary of Education's $40 Million Yacht Set Adrift by Vandals (Page 7)

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Define irony..

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Eye of Providence

The Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God) is a symbol, having its origin in Christian iconography, showing an eye often surrounded by rays of light or a glory and usually enclosed by a triangle. It represents the eye of God watching over humanity (the concept of divine providence).

In the modern era, a notable depiction of the eye is the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, which appears on the United States one-dollar bill.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]


E pluribus unum

E pluribus unum included in the Great Seal of the United States, being one of the nation's mottos at the time of the seal's creation
E pluribus unum -Latin for "Out of many, one" alternatively translated as "One out of many" or "One from many")—is a 13-letter traditional motto of the United States, appearing on the Great Seal along with Annuit cœptis (Latin for "he approves the undertaking [lit. 'things undertaken']") and Novus ordo seclorum (Latin for "New order of the ages"), and adopted by an Act of Congress in 1782.

Never codified by law, E pluribus unum was considered a de facto motto of the United States until 1956 when the United States Congress passed an act (H. J. Resolution 396), adopting "In God We Trust" as the official motto
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Lots of things..

Ipsissimus

Ipsissimus is quite hard to translate directly from Latin to English, but it is essentially the superlative of "self", translating rather approximately to "His most Selfness," or "self-est."


An Ipsissimus is free from limitations and necessity and lives in perfect balance with the manifest universe. Essentially, the highest mode of attainment. This grade corresponds to Kether on the Tree of Life.

Crowley named as a condition of this grade the trance Nirodha-samapatti, which reduces heartbeat and other life functions to the bare minimum. Theravada Buddhist monks traditionally attain nirodha-samapatti by producing the aforementioned Formless States one after the other, and perceiving in each what they call the Three Characteristics of all existence: sorrow or tendency towards sorrow, change or unreliability, and insubstantiality or lack of self.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

out of many one or one out of many describes synergy avoiding singularly


[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

avoiding singularity causes cause to never be nothing or one cause of cause is always two or more

thus cause is always flexible and never inflexible in its effect because there is always two or forces causing the one effect
this subtle difference in thought causes god's will to never be the final say no matter what a god may say




[link to blogs.britannica.com]

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

yes
meanings and moral values within our 21st century are visibly altering in comparison to previous centuries on many topics generally

Thread: How can I not prejudge?

Thread: NPC Definition

Reminds..

Blue-Eyes-Brown-Eyes exercise

On the first day of the exercise, she designated the blue-eyed children as the superior group. Elliott provided brown fabric collars and asked the blue-eyed students to wrap them around the necks of their brown-eyed peers as a method to easily identify the minority group. She gave the blue-eyed children extra privileges, such as second helpings at lunch, access to the new jungle gym, and five extra minutes at recess. The blue-eyed children sat in the front of the classroom, and the brown-eyed children were sent to sit in the back rows. The blue-eyed children were encouraged to play only with other blue-eyed children and to ignore those with brown eyes. Elliott would not allow brown-eyed and blue-eyed children to drink from the same water fountain and often chastised the brown-eyed students when they did not follow the exercise's rules or made mistakes. She often exemplified the differences between the two groups by singling out students and would use negative aspects of brown-eyed children to emphasize a point.

At first, there was resistance among the students in the minority group to the idea that blue-eyed children were better than brown-eyed children. To counter this, Elliott lied to the children by stating that melanin was linked to their higher intelligence and learning ability. Shortly thereafter, this initial resistance fell away. Those who were deemed "superior" became arrogant, bossy, and otherwise unpleasant to their "inferior" classmates. Their grades on simple tests were better, and they completed mathematical and reading tasks that had seemed outside their ability before. The "inferior" classmates also transformed – into timid and subservient children who scored more poorly on tests, and even during recess isolated themselves, including those who had previously been dominant in the class. These children's academic performance suffered, even with tasks that had been simple before.

...

Academic research into Elliott's exercise shows moderate results in reducing long-term prejudice but is inconclusive on the question of whether the possible psychological harm outweighs the potential benefits. Two professors of education in England, Ivor Goodson and Pat Sikes, argue that what Elliott did was unethical, calling the exercise psychologically and emotionally damaging. They also stated ethical concerns pertaining to the fact that the children were not told of the purpose of the exercise beforehand.
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Thread: China - The world's first digital dictatorship.

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]







Wife of Interpol chief who vanished in China says she fears he has been killed on behalf of 'cruel' and 'dirty' Beijing officials
[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]