Mad World

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Define Real. Photographs and certain views trigger certain responses. What differentiates this from an emotional or hormonal response?

For all intents and purposes: what Kanye is experiencing is real, but most are happy to denegrate him.

A lot of what he is saying is low hanging fruit.

Real as in..the fingers I'm using to type this sentence.


I think it is more simple than that.

I think it was mostly triggered by Pete Davidson's ancestry. The seed was already there, and that set it off.

It makes sense. Kim moved on pretty fast I will say, but after dealing with Kanye for years plus this new religious thing, was unbearable.

All communication is based on a discernable medium of conveyance and repeatable but potentially mutable units of propagation.

It's in pulses and waves. Like I've been saying for 10 years.

What religious thing?

The only religion I see is power and influence.

I've never listened to his music. This is the only thing I've seen him in.


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

that's also how hormones and emotions work. It's why I chose these descriptors years back. In fact you will see I described it as both having many layers and needing to convey many senses and images simultaneously.

What you are alluding to is still ambiguous.

What is the commonality?

Not exactly, the repetitive or repetitively placating allows for the detachment(sudden rush) to occur. It could be lost time while driving due to the gym or putting oneself on physical autopilot.

It diverges the merger.

Again, what is the commonality as it reaches in and begins to undulate and revolve.

Many iconographers have captured it.

It's just varying pressures. The third eye picks it up just like an eardrum.

It works on its own. Just like the ear drum if you aren't deaf.


[link to youtu.be (secure)]

relatability!

it's being able to address people on their own level.

levels are a matter of differentiating degrees of understanding and comprehension on a wide variety of subjects.

if you have a higher degree of comprehension on a subject than another person, and the other person doesn't wish to acknowledge that comprehension, then commonality is moot!

an intellectual approach to matters that are cut and dry are fine! but wouldn't suffice when discussing matters such as intuition...etc! there is no commonality there!

i understand your approach when trying to be rational and in a sense deprogram seer by explaining the lack of rational for prescient, but prescient has played a large role in human history.

you may discount personal experience as inconsequential on an intellectual level because it can't be quantified in a real sense, but i would point to quantum and its acceptance by science as something that largely is not understood and barely quantifiable!

in conclusion, it may be your intellectual argument that is lacking in comprehension! just a thought! lol

ps i have no doubt that you are a good friend of seer, my observations for the last ten years, give or take, allow me to make that conclusion, but if you fail to realize that she is your better on matters of psychic phenomena, and don't support her in something you may or may not understand, then
you may need to look at your own intellectual ego and your lack of emotional intellect!

for the record i must distinguish a difference between the occult and paranormal psychic phenomena! lol

i don't agree with seer on many subjects but i don't try and browbeat her too much! lol

Communication is communication. As opinions are opinions. Funny how you vacillate.

Neither works well without an understanding.

when the blade runners asked testing questions of the replicas, they weren't trying to determine the validity of their memories, they were attempting to determine their emotional capacity regarding their feelings to those memories! lol

So do and are emotions. You understand psi phenomena are a part of A.I?

If you cannot understand or communicate something you are lead by it, in that you assume what that motive force is.

Denial is often the mother of repetition.

that's the stupidest thing you've ever said! must have hit the nail on the head! lol

i think your extreme stimulations have deteriorated your intellectual abilities! ten years of self-abuse and pickling brain cells is evident! lol

No, like the turing test , the voight kampff test looked for discrepancies in nuances. In the Turing test..the nuances of language and the vk in discrepancies in emotional response; As the craplicants lacked those subtleties and it caused physiologic stress.

It seems every new utterance could be the stupidest thing you have said.Rofl

Are you a craplicant?

the smarter he tries to sound the stupider he gets! lol

I like pictures, but I like my words.
I don't think I'm overly verbose, but everyone is entitled to their opinions.
Even "teddy"

Pictures can be four dimensional, words cannot. but some people prefer words. Here's the thing lolac, I don't pander. if someone is incapable of understanding senior-in-high-school tier vocabulary, that is honestly their problem.

dang! wrong post! i'll do it again just to make a point!

the smarter he tries to sound the stupider he gets! lol

he cuts and pastes other people's conclusions and thinks it make him sound intelligent! lol

maybe! but condescension is your definitely your problem!

lol

no, you get it wrong. I actually believe everyone is capable of understanding what I write, I don't believe IQ is inherently limited. That's why I won't pander, because I know everyone is capable of it. And if they don't want to bother trying, that's fine too. There are cliffnotes everywhere.

I am not in favor of the "simpler is always best" bs...
There are some brilliant writings out there that are rather complex to read, and I think they are worthwhile, fascinating, stimulating to read.

Of course a picture is worth a thousand words. A picture can demonstrate things that simply cannot be translated.

[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

But writing has its place, too.

Exactly, I think you are getting the hang of this. Repetition is the basis of communication. You might even try to mimic me next.

But, for now, you fail the turing test.

what interest me about you is not your intelligence, it's your curiosity about things you have no inherent sense of.

maybe one day you will find a method of emotional understanding via your intellectual process that will blossom into the ability that you seek! lol

grasping a concept, is the first step! but whether you have the discipline to practice it, is another matter, to me you seem too impetuous! lol




intro