relatability!

it's being able to address people on their own level.

levels are a matter of differentiating degrees of understanding and comprehension on a wide variety of subjects.

if you have a higher degree of comprehension on a subject than another person, and the other person doesn't wish to acknowledge that comprehension, then commonality is moot!

an intellectual approach to matters that are cut and dry are fine! but wouldn't suffice when discussing matters such as intuition...etc! there is no commonality there!

i understand your approach when trying to be rational and in a sense deprogram seer by explaining the lack of rational for prescient, but prescient has played a large role in human history.

you may discount personal experience as inconsequential on an intellectual level because it can't be quantified in a real sense, but i would point to quantum and its acceptance by science as something that largely is not understood and barely quantifiable!

in conclusion, it may be your intellectual argument that is lacking in comprehension! just a thought! lol

ps i have no doubt that you are a good friend of seer, my observations for the last ten years, give or take, allow me to make that conclusion, but if you fail to realize that she is your better on matters of psychic phenomena, and don't support her in something you may or may not understand, then
you may need to look at your own intellectual ego and your lack of emotional intellect!

for the record i must distinguish a difference between the occult and paranormal psychic phenomena! lol