Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,557 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 564,263
Pageviews Today: 735,958Threads Today: 218Posts Today: 2,971
06:30 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Birth Certificate Estate-Two Birthdates Exposed!!!
Poster Handle DizzieMissLizzie
Post Content
it would have to be done before the child was 7 years old, after that, all titles are siezed under maritime salvage laws. to try and do it later is nearly impossible.

one would face the same issues legally as those who went on the crusades and returned more than 7 years later to get their estates back. most estates where placed in trust to the Roman Catholic Church or the Crown and when the rightful heirs did return, most never regained their properties.

same goes today, also, the mother and father would have to deal with the fact the paperwork shows the "mother"/"witness" testimony that she used her "madien name" meaning she and the father where not married when the child was born. that testimony means the child was a baststard and all bastard children are wards of the state.

after 7 years, it probably won't happen.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71917929


they were asking how to do it before 7 years though.

I was reading the black card thread and found a link there to a .pdf someone made about there dealings with correcting the information on their childrens BC so that their names were no in all capital letters on the certificate. what happened there was very interesting!

basically, vital stats admitted there was a mistake and said to send it back in and they would send out the corrections but what they got back was not a BC, it was a COLB. so they went back to get a new BC after that and the record was sealed!


batman and boris point out that we never signed these BCs, our own signatures are not on them so we are making false claims by using them!

I think this is why people are having them authenticated and then either signing them or turning them over to an agent of the US.

KW says that the BC is an agency and that we are appointed by the US to be agents and that when we first use the BC as identification (which it actually says not to be used as) at that time we ratify the appointment. so now we can resign the agency or novate the contract.


it really is the topic of all topics. I dont know why more people are not looking into this stuff.
 Quoting: fellow man 29203778


the BC (footprinted) goes to the State Registrars office and gets booked. Anyone looking for one should start there.

however, as pointed out, the real CONTRACT at issue here is between the hospital and the Mother/Father. Their use of a midwife is no different.

Lies were told by Mom and Dad, non restricted signatures on hospital "admission" papers are a huge issue, as is the use of a domestic address and the mom and dad using their legal names and State issued ID to get benefits from the Hospital.

Then of course their is the matter of not paying the Hosptial for services rendered at the birth, which all goes back to FIAT currency (Federal Reserve Notes).

The entire thing is a cluster of ignorant choices made by incompetent, ignorant persons who have fallen under the spells of "authorities" who actually have no authority.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71408469


Check your mother's name - is it her maiden name when listed under 'mother's name' and married name when listed under 'informant'? why do you think this is? Also - paying the import fee/tax seems to be a good thing to do if you can find out how.....
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP