The Word of the Lord came to Jeremiah | |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: puredreaming Fine an angel Jacob calls God, and an angel that Jacob asks to bless Josephs sons at a much later date. Seems to me that Jacob was an idolater, asking blessings from an angel, calling an angel God. Or there is something else going on. Where are you getting this nonsense? From your imagination? Isaac trembled violently and said, "Who was it, then, that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I blessed him--and indeed he will be blessed!" Genesis 27:33 the Angel who has delivered me from all harm —may he bless these boys. its from what I posted earlier. Genesis 48. Yes. And it's not idolatry. Did Isaac think himself to be God too? Or Balaam? You're reasoning from a false premise. No they didn't think they were God. I am arguing that this so called Angel of God, is most likely God a theophany of Jesus, since you like those words. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism Where are you getting this nonsense? From your imagination? Isaac trembled violently and said, "Who was it, then, that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I blessed him--and indeed he will be blessed!" Genesis 27:33 the Angel who has delivered me from all harm —may he bless these boys. its from what I posted earlier. Genesis 48. Yes. And it's not idolatry. Did Isaac think himself to be God too? Or Balaam? You're reasoning from a false premise. No they didn't think they were God. I am arguing that this so called Angel of God, is most likely God a theophany of Jesus, since you like those words. So? A messenger is a messenger. Jehovah's witnesses agrees with you. At least they acknowledge YHWH. Last Edited by Monotheism on 01/17/2016 05:38 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27957063 United States 01/17/2016 05:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: puredreaming the Angel who has delivered me from all harm —may he bless these boys. its from what I posted earlier. Genesis 48. Yes. And it's not idolatry. Did Isaac think himself to be God too? Or Balaam? You're reasoning from a false premise. No they didn't think they were God. I am arguing that this so called Angel of God, is most likely God a theophany of Jesus, since you like those words. So? A messenger is a messenger. Jehovah's witnesses agress with you. At least they acknowledge YHWH. I am not interested in Jehovahs witnesses. I acknowledge God just fine. The true nature of God is what the thread is about. That is where we have some disagreement. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Lord appeared to Abraham near the great trees of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. 2Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them and bowed low to the ground. The Lord appeared to Abraham as 1 of 3 men. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism Yes. And it's not idolatry. Did Isaac think himself to be God too? Or Balaam? You're reasoning from a false premise. No they didn't think they were God. I am arguing that this so called Angel of God, is most likely God a theophany of Jesus, since you like those words. So? A messenger is a messenger. Jehovah's witnesses agress with you. At least they acknowledge YHWH. I am not interested in Jehovahs witnesses. I acknowledge God just fine. The true nature of God is what the thread is about. That is where we have some disagreement. No, you don't acknowledge God just fine. And you're not making a whole lot of sense either. Are you interested in learning or listening to others at all? Seems I'm repeating myself to you all the time. So Jesus is an angel? Ok fine, he's still not YHWH. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where is your wife Sarah?” they asked him. “There, in the tent,” he said. 10Then one of them said, “I will surely return to you about this time next year, and Sarah your wife will have a son.” Now Sarah was listening at the entrance to the tent, which was behind him. 11Abraham and Sarah were already very old, and Sarah was past the age of childbearing. 12So Sarah laughed to herself as she thought, “After I am worn out and my lord is old, will I now have this pleasure?” 13Then the Lord said to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh and say, ‘Will I really have a child, now that I am old?’ 14Is anything too hard for the Lord? I will return to you at the appointed time next year, and Sarah will have a son.” This is no ordinary man speaking to Abraham, He is the Lord, but looks like a man. Kinda like another man some time later. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: puredreaming No they didn't think they were God. I am arguing that this so called Angel of God, is most likely God a theophany of Jesus, since you like those words. So? A messenger is a messenger. Jehovah's witnesses agress with you. At least they acknowledge YHWH. I am not interested in Jehovahs witnesses. I acknowledge God just fine. The true nature of God is what the thread is about. That is where we have some disagreement. No, you don't acknowledge God just fine. And you're not making a whole lot of sense either. Are you interested in learning or listening to others at all? Seems I'm repeating myself to you all the time. So Jesus is an angel? Ok fine, he's still not YHWH. Ok, we make some progress, so you admit Jesus existed before he was born. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 05:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Lord appeared to Abraham near the great trees of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance to his tent in the heat of the day. 2Abraham looked up and saw three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he hurried from the entrance of his tent to meet them and bowed low to the ground. Quoting: puredreaming The Lord appeared to Abraham as 1 of 3 men. It doesn't say "the LORD" it says YHWH. And the angel of YHWH is interchangeably referred to as just YHWH in several passages, because he acts and speaks in His behalf. And we already know a fact that Jesus is not YHWH. Last Edited by Monotheism on 01/17/2016 05:48 PM |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism So? A messenger is a messenger. Jehovah's witnesses agress with you. At least they acknowledge YHWH. I am not interested in Jehovahs witnesses. I acknowledge God just fine. The true nature of God is what the thread is about. That is where we have some disagreement. No, you don't acknowledge God just fine. And you're not making a whole lot of sense either. Are you interested in learning or listening to others at all? Seems I'm repeating myself to you all the time. So Jesus is an angel? Ok fine, he's still not YHWH. Ok, we make some progress, so you admit Jesus existed before he was born. No, I don't, but it's irrelevant to the identity of YHWH. And God is what's important to me. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 05:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: puredreaming I am not interested in Jehovahs witnesses. I acknowledge God just fine. The true nature of God is what the thread is about. That is where we have some disagreement. No, you don't acknowledge God just fine. And you're not making a whole lot of sense either. Are you interested in learning or listening to others at all? Seems I'm repeating myself to you all the time. So Jesus is an angel? Ok fine, he's still not YHWH. Ok, we make some progress, so you admit Jesus existed before he was born. No, I don't, but it's irrelevant to the identity of YHWH. And God is what's important to me. Its very relevant because Jesus is God, or He isn't. All these passages point to God even in the OT coming in human form to visit people. God came to the patriarchs are talked to them, and apparently He took the form of a human. We have God Almighty that resides in the heavenlies, and we have God that sometimes leaves the heavenlies to walk around on this planet, and when He does, He looks like a man. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism No, you don't acknowledge God just fine. And you're not making a whole lot of sense either. Are you interested in learning or listening to others at all? Seems I'm repeating myself to you all the time. So Jesus is an angel? Ok fine, he's still not YHWH. Ok, we make some progress, so you admit Jesus existed before he was born. No, I don't, but it's irrelevant to the identity of YHWH. And God is what's important to me. Its very relevant because Jesus is God, or He isn't. All these passages point to God even in the OT coming in human form to visit people. God came to the patriarchs are talked to them, and apparently He took the form of a human. We have God Almighty that resides in the heavenlies, and we have God that sometimes leaves the heavenlies to walk around on this planet, and when He does, He looks like a man. I have already given you scriptural evidence proving he's not. Why are you actively seeking to pervert the truth about God with such fervour? Make up your mind, is he an angel or God? And angels are described as anthropomorphic. The angel of YHWH, is often interchangeably referred to as just YHWH, it's the principle of agency, the angel is a messenger. Last Edited by Monotheism on 01/17/2016 06:03 PM |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Last Edited by Monotheism on 01/17/2016 06:02 PM |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Quoting: Monotheism Jesus is the Son, not the Father. Thought you knew that. And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27957063 United States 01/17/2016 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour. Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet: All sheep and oxen, yea, and the beasts of the field; The fowl of the air, and the fish of the sea, and whatsoever passeth through the paths of the seas. O LORD our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Quoting: Monotheism Jesus is the Son, not the Father. Thought you knew that. And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 "You are my witnesses," declares YHWH, "and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. Isaiah 43:10 You were shown these things so that you might know that YHWH is God; besides him there is no other. Deuteronomy 4:35 Acknowledge and take to heart this day that YHWH is God in heaven above and on the earth below. There is no other. Deuteronomy 4:39 I am YHWH, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, Isaiah 45:5 |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Quoting: Monotheism Jesus is the Son, not the Father. Thought you knew that. And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 I acknowledge God, would it be better if I said YHWH. I guess I don't feel the need to use those letters, God works just fine for me. Jesus said other things like: Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really know me, you will knowb my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” 9Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Quoting: Monotheism Jesus is the Son, not the Father. Thought you knew that. And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 I acknowledge God, would it be better if I said YHWH. I guess I don't feel the need to use those letters, God works just fine for me. Jesus said other things like: Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really know me, you will knowb my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” But Jesus is not YHWH. That's the point. You using the most holy and exalted name in such a blasphemous way still won't make it so. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 I acknowledge God, would it be better if I said YHWH. I guess I don't feel the need to use those letters, God works just fine for me. Jesus said other things like: Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really know me, you will knowb my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” But Jesus is not YHWH. That's the point. You using the most holy and exalted name in such a blasphemous way still won't make it so. You seems very focused in saying that I only believe in Jesus. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 3 different manifestations of the one true God. I don't pretend to understand the totality of Gods nature. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Quoting: puredreaming 9Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me Yes? Didn't you just affirm that the Father is not the son? It would be easier debating you if you didn't contradict yourself every five minutes. The Greek word translated as see, horao, also has the figurative meaning to see or mentally percieve, which is the meaning in this context; the context it about knowing the Father through the son and the words manifest. Something the Pharisees failed to do. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Quoting: puredreaming 9Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me Yes? Didn't you just affirm that the Father is not the son? It would be easier debating you if you didn't contradict yourself every five minutes. The Greek word translated as see, horao, also has the figurative meaning to see or mentally percieve, which is the meaning in this context; the context it about knowing the Father through the son and the words manifest. Something the Pharisees failed to do. I fail to see the contradiction. Jesus basically told them when the see Him, they see the Father. They are like one. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 I acknowledge God, would it be better if I said YHWH. I guess I don't feel the need to use those letters, God works just fine for me. Jesus said other things like: Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really know me, you will knowb my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him.” But Jesus is not YHWH. That's the point. You using the most holy and exalted name in such a blasphemous way still won't make it so. You seems very focused in saying that I only believe in Jesus. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 3 different manifestations of the one true God. I don't pretend to understand the totality of Gods nature. That's modalism. And equally false. The Father is YHWH. The spirit is the spirit of YHWH, not a separate person. And the anointed servent-son and prophet of YHWH is not YHWH. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Quoting: puredreaming 9Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me Yes? Didn't you just affirm that the Father is not the son? It would be easier debating you if you didn't contradict yourself every five minutes. The Greek word translated as see, horao, also has the figurative meaning to see or mentally percieve, which is the meaning in this context; the context it about knowing the Father through the son and the words manifest. Something the Pharisees failed to do. I fail to see the contradiction. Jesus basically told them when the see Him, they see the Father. They are like one. It's a figurative word. And now you're arguing modalism as of a sudden? From trinity to modalism in 60 seconds. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OT verses affirmed in the NT as pertaining to Jesus: Quoting: Monotheism 15 YHWH your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him. 16 For this is what you asked of YHWH your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, “Let us not hear the voice of YHWH our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die.” 17 YHWH said to me: “What they say is good. 18 I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him. Deuteronomy 18:15-18 11 A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse; from his roots a Branch will bear fruit. 2 The Spirit of YHWH will rest on him— the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the Spirit of counsel and of might, the Spirit of the knowledge and fear of YHWH— 3 and he will delight in the fear of YHWH. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he hears with his ears; Isaiah 11:1-3 42 “Here is my [YHWH's] servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; I will put my Spirit on him, and he will bring justice to the nations. Isaiah 42:1 And Jesus is clearly not the Father. Which makes your theory even more ridiculous. Quoting: Monotheism Jesus is the Son, not the Father. Thought you knew that. And the Father is YHWH. The God you refuse to acknowledge. Or as Jesus put it: Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'" John 20:17 Servant. Prophet. God-fearing. "You are my witnesses," declares YHWH, "and my servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor will there be one after me. Isaiah 43:10 You were shown these things so that you might know that YHWH is God; besides him there is no other. Deuteronomy 4:35 Acknowledge and take to heart this day that YHWH is God in heaven above and on the earth below. There is no other. Deuteronomy 4:39 I am YHWH, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, Isaiah 45:5 |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Quoting: puredreaming 9Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10Don’t you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? The words I say to you I do not speak on my own authority. Rather, it is the Father, living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me Yes? Didn't you just affirm that the Father is not the son? It would be easier debating you if you didn't contradict yourself every five minutes. The Greek word translated as see, horao, also has the figurative meaning to see or mentally percieve, which is the meaning in this context; the context it about knowing the Father through the son and the words manifest. Something the Pharisees failed to do. I fail to see the contradiction. Jesus basically told them when the see Him, they see the Father. They are like one. It's a figurative word. And now you're arguing modalism as of a sudden? From trinity to modalism in 60 seconds. I don't really care what modalism is. Maybe its just an attempt to describe the nature of God. I really don't care about the labels either. This is just dogma. If you could admit that Jesus was the only way to the Father, then we might be able to agree on something. This you cannot admit. Whatever the nature of God, Jesus is His plan to save humanity from its sin and suffering. |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified HIS SERVANT JESUS. You handed him over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. Acts 3:13 That's a wrap for me. Good night. |
puredreaming
(OP) User ID: 69921256 United States 01/17/2016 06:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Monotheism
User ID: 71260286 Sweden 01/17/2016 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Monotheism Yes? Didn't you just affirm that the Father is not the son? It would be easier debating you if you didn't contradict yourself every five minutes. The Greek word translated as see, horao, also has the figurative meaning to see or mentally percieve, which is the meaning in this context; the context it about knowing the Father through the son and the words manifest. Something the Pharisees failed to do. I fail to see the contradiction. Jesus basically told them when the see Him, they see the Father. They are like one. It's a figurative word. And now you're arguing modalism as of a sudden? From trinity to modalism in 60 seconds. I don't really care what modalism is. Maybe its just an attempt to describe the nature of God. I really don't care about the labels either. This is just dogma. If you could admit that Jesus was the only way to the Father, then we might be able to agree on something. This you cannot admit. Whatever the nature of God, Jesus is His plan to save humanity from its sin and suffering. I knew you would say that. If you don't even know who the Father is how can you expect to enter the kingdom? Last Edited by Monotheism on 01/17/2016 06:37 PM |