Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it

Users Online Now: 2,053 (Who's On?)		Visitors Today: 1,377,416
Pageviews Today: 1,887,685	Threads Today: 476	Posts Today: 8,118
02:55 PM

Page 1 Bottom Search Replies Previous Page Next Page
Search Terms: Highlight Matches
Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it
Manu-K Offer Upgrade User ID: 69300065 Spain 01/20/2016 04:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] What he omits to say is that when they have robots in your brain connected to the net they'll also control your mind from the net. Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/20/2016 04:26 AM Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”

Grove Street User ID: 70305012 United States 01/20/2016 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it that's alright. he'll be dead by then and the system will be broken beyond repair for quite some time. no worries. Grove And this is why we can't have nice things.
Manu-K (OP) User ID: 69300065 Spain 01/20/2016 04:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it that's alright. he'll be dead by then and the system will be broken beyond repair for quite some time. no worries. Quoting: Grove Street What if they offered you to live forever in an artificial simulation in the cloud? Being young forever and surrounded by your loved ones. Last Edited by Manu-K on 01/20/2016 04:30 AM Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71275106 Australia 01/20/2016 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it that's alright. he'll be dead by then and the system will be broken beyond repair for quite some time. no worries. Quoting: Grove Street What if they offered you to live forever in an artificial simulation in the cloud? Being young forever and surrounded by your loved ones. Quoting: Manu-K But it would not be forever. The cloud and the tech supporting it could not last over 100 years. But if you live an electronic life as code algorythm a second here would be eons there as you live at a fraction under light speed. So 100 years outside the cloud would be trillions of years within it. But still...not forever.
Manu-K (OP) User ID: 69300065 Spain 01/20/2016 04:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it that's alright. he'll be dead by then and the system will be broken beyond repair for quite some time. no worries. Quoting: Grove Street What if they offered you to live forever in an artificial simulation in the cloud? Being young forever and surrounded by your loved ones. Quoting: Manu-K But it would not be forever. The cloud and the tech supporting it could not last over 100 years. But if you live an electronic life as code algorythm a second here would be eons there as you live at a fraction under light speed. So 100 years outside the cloud would be trillions of years within it. But still...not forever. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71275106 Totally. And we don't know for sure how long the cloud will last. Banned as usual. “It is far easier to be a weakling than to be a Real Man. Were the Earth less harsh or the circumstances of life less austere, man would destroy himself before the shrine of the languid goddess. Only Real Men can with safety destroy the tangled forests and wilderness of Earth and make from them gardens, but will those who inherit the gardens be Real Men? The law decrees that they must be, or the wilderness will reclaim its own.”
The Duck of Death (one and d User ID: 69422359 United States 01/20/2016 06:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it Would you like another glass of water Director Skinner? Drinky! Drinky!
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71277840 Australia 01/20/2016 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation	Re: Kurzweil says we could have nanobots in our brains by 2030 and paints a nice picture about it We already have 'nanobots' in our brains, well in yours and Kurzweil's, they used to be known as demons.

Page 1 Top Previous Page Next Page

Related Threads

GLP