Donald Trump: Don't hand federal lands to states

Looks like Trump doesn't get it. States rights, Trump. Pull your head our of your ass.

Maybe you should donate your property to .gov then.

People who believe Trump is the great savior will possibly have a rude awakening.

Trust no one. Give no one your undying support. Think critically.

I'm not saying Trump is a bad choice, I'm just amazed at the Trump mania which swallows the hype and fails to look critically at the substance.

well, there you have it, the donald exposed himself and you are about to get fucked.

just to clear up any doubts you might have about his agenda, the donald has revealed that he is either ignorant of what the constitution says ( he believes that the gov should own the state's lands) - or he is NOT going to support - but IGNORE the supreme law of this land...and call it "progressive"

of course you knew that all along, one of the first things he promised was a bigger Military ... which translates BIGGER GOVERNMENT ... to give us "security" (in exchange for our last freedom - privacy) - so we can "bomb the hell out of them and TAKE THEIR OIL"

which all really depends on whether obummer leaves - or not

well, there you have it, the donald exposed himself and you are about to get fucked.

just to clear up any doubts you might have about his agenda, the donald has revealed that he is either ignorant of what the constitution says ( he believes that the gov should own the state's lands) - or he is NOT going to support - but IGNORE the supreme law of this land...and call it "progressive"

of course you knew that all along, one of the first things he promised was a bigger Military ... which translates BIGGER GOVERNMENT ... to give us "security" (in exchange for our last freedom - privacy) - so we can "bomb the hell out of them and TAKE THEIR OIL"

which all really depends on whether obummer leaves - or not

Maybe you should donate your property to .gov then.

People who believe Trump is the great savior will possibly have a rude awakening.

Trust no one. Give no one your undying support. Think critically.

I'm not saying Trump is a bad choice, I'm just amazed at the Trump mania which swallows the hype and fails to look critically at the substance.

The casino thing was theoretical. I am all for his stance on NAFTA. Why should foreign goods flood our states when the tariffs on our goods to those same foreign states are cost prohibitive, but at what cost for this to be done? Some of these entities own the majority of our debt. What will be Trumps leverage? Right now our commons are being used as leverage.
What else is there? So stands to reason that is what Trump will use. So yeah you will still get to hunt that barren reclaimed mining site (cause China is so eco friendly).
While the NSA steps up micro-mining mega data to create biodynamic lists of who could or might be a terrorist on the merican populace. While the military industrial complex in an attempt to remain biggest and best beyond comprehension, sale arms to the same countries who foment terrorism or this or that rebel faction, thereby increasing the demand for our #1 export.

Sorry Trumpeters a wall is not gonna fix problems like that no matter who pays for it.

So you don't mind progressive, so long as they claim to be republican?

Last time I checked, I own my property and Trump isn't trying to take it or anyone else's.

Get a grip.

Nobody's perfect.

I'll take my chances with Trump over the other puppets and idiots running, many of which are far worse on issues compared to the nuances of Fed vs. state lands.

Trump is BY FAR the best choice of the candidates running. There's nothing wrong with supporting him vociferously. It doesn't make you a sheep or some mindless drone.

Trump is an idiot. I supported him initially, but now I can see that he was only prepared to say a couple of things that the majority of idiots want to hear him say. Anything else, and he's lost.

Watch the video of him answering the 'Nuclear Triad' question. Just google it and watch. The guy even explains to him what the triad is as part of the question.

I have come to the conclusion that he is either a bit slow, or he is quite literally making a mockery of our intelligence. It's the Lois Griffin strategy. The saddest part is, I think it is the latter, and it's working.

It doesn't much matter anyway. The country I grew up in has faded and gone, replaced with a corporate shell. There is no saving it. Idiocracy has become a reality. Welcome to 2016. Excuse me while I go try and drown myself in a pile of snow.

Trump is an idiot. I supported him initially, but now I can see that he was only prepared to say a couple of things that the majority of idiots want to hear him say. Anything else, and he's lost.

Watch the video of him answering the 'Nuclear Triad' question. Just google it and watch. The guy even explains to him what the triad is as part of the question.

I have come to the conclusion that he is either a bit slow, or he is quite literally making a mockery of our intelligence. It's the Lois Griffin strategy. The saddest part is, I think it is the latter, and it's working.

It doesn't much matter anyway. The country I grew up in has faded and gone, replaced with a corporate shell. There is no saving it. Idiocracy has become a reality. Welcome to 2016. Excuse me while I go try and drown myself in a pile of snow.

Maybe you should donate your property to .gov then.

People who believe Trump is the great savior will possibly have a rude awakening.

Trust no one. Give no one your undying support. Think critically.

I'm not saying Trump is a bad choice, I'm just amazed at the Trump mania which swallows the hype and fails to look critically at the substance.

How come Hillary is never asked questions about the nuclear triad? Instead they ask her about what TV shows she likes.

I'd never even heard of the nuke triad and I'm pretty educated on political matters.

You've giving zero credit to a man who uses NO teleprompter, ever, speaks from his heart and handles an enormous amount of "incoming" and criticism from the press with shrewd gamesmanship and chutzpah.

Anyway...go bury yourself in snow or whatever.

How come Hillary is never asked questions about the nuclear triad? Instead they ask her about what TV shows she likes.

I'd never even heard of the nuke triad and I'm pretty educated on political matters.

You've giving zero credit to a man who uses NO teleprompter, ever, speaks from his heart and handles an enormous amount of "incoming" and criticism from the press with shrewd gamesmanship and chutzpah.

Anyway...go bury yourself in snow or whatever.

WRONG! Eminent Domain is in the Constitution and has been protected since day one.


Guess The Don knows more about the Constitution than you do lol

NO MAJOR POLITICIAN TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT WHERE HE REALLY STANDS...i.e. no one you ever see on major network debates. Not since the 20s.

Sorry to have to burst your bubble, but Donald is probably just the best actor, and the most well versed on populist rhetoric (most of the time) of the current batch of Rockefeller/NWO-approved candidates. In truth, he is an absolutely megalomaniacal monster who will do NONE of the good things he claims he will do after he is elected. There is always some trumped up excuse (sorry for the bad pun) that prevents them from "doing what they really wanted to do."

Geesh...I thought people on this forum were already awake?!?!?

Once again, Eminent Domain can not be used by the government to take a citizen's property so it can give it to another citizen or private company.

It can only be used to take property for public use (roads, government buildings, bases, etc...)

Please stop trying to say the former is the same as the latter.

You're better than that...

I find it concerning that the number one gripe from Trump's critics on this issue is that Eminent Domain is somehow unconstitutional or that it isn't conservative. It is right there in the Fifth Amendment and PLENTY of conservatives have used it before. It isn't something new and yes it doesn't exactly fit with our private property rights as we like to know them in the country. But if you are going to criticize something like this at least educate yourselves on the issue before posting.

I find it concerning that the number one gripe from Trump's critics on this issue is that Eminent Domain is somehow unconstitutional or that it isn't conservative. It is right there in the Fifth Amendment and PLENTY of conservatives have used it before. It isn't something new and yes it doesn't exactly fit with our private property rights as we like to know them in the country. But if you are going to criticize something like this at least educate yourselves on the issue before posting.

That isn't what was being discussed. Can you read the comment I replied to before you respond. the issue was with:

"the donald has revealed that he is either ignorant of what the constitution says ( he believes that the gov should own the state's lands) - or he is NOT going to support - but IGNORE the supreme law of this land...and call it "progressive""

So I responded that the Constitution DOES in fact give the Federal government authority to do so.

So your comment is either directed at someone else or you are trying to take this conversation in an entirely different direction.

Last time I checked, I own my property and Trump isn't trying to take it or anyone else's.

Get a grip.