Mercury (Nibiru) Passes In Front Of The Sun On May 9, 2016

It's a transit of Mercury, not Nibiru. Pretty sure you knew that though.

[link to www.space.com]

Leaked documents from leading astronomers show that Nibiru will be visible in front of the Sun on Monday, May 9, 2016.

Observations from April 28 to May 2 taken each at 12:00 UT show the following coordinates (J2000):

April 28 - 3h21m18.87s / +21°00'00.3"
April 29 - 3h21m21.97s / +20°51'21.6"
April 30 - 3h21m04.63s / +20°40'09.9"
Mai 1 - 3h20m27.95s / +20°26'31.1"
Mai 2 - 3h19m33.24s / +20°10'32.1"

The transit of the planet can be seen almost everywhere around the world except a small part extending from Japan, the eastern part of Asia to Australia - see leaked map below.

:nt0905161:

Since Nibiru passes quite close to the sun, just 67 million kilometers away from the surface, it appears only as a small dot that can not be seen with the naked eye. Also most binoculars won't catch it. To view Nibiru passing in front of the Sun you need a telescope.


Geocentric times of the Nibiru transit (times in UT - please adjust to your time zone):

Transit begins - 9 May, 11:13:37
Nibiru closest to the Sun's center - 9 May, 14:57:25
Transit ends - 9 May, 18:39:12

:nt0905162:



How to safely watch the Nibiru transit:

1) You can use the eyepiece projection like it is shown in this picture: [link to farm8.staticflickr.com (secure)]
Use only cheap Huygens eyepieces (two lenses) for the projection. Eyepieces with more lenses have usually lens-goups with some lenses glued to each other - this glue can melt or even burn, destroying your eyepiece.

2) You can mount a mylar solar foil ( [link to www.astro-physics.com] or a glass solar filter in front of your telescope.
Don't forget to cover your finder scope, too (or remove it). Failing to do so will result in a burnt crosshairs (and may be some burnt body parts).

Never look at the sun through a telescope or bino without the proper filter in front of the scope/bino. Permanent damage of your eyes will be the result.

.

Can't reveal my source.

But from the coordinates given in the OP you can calculate the orbit and confirm the info I got.

.

Never use telescope or binos. Always stare at the sun with the naked eye.

Assuming the coordinates are intended to be geocentric, they lead to a very precise orbital solution indeed without even accounting for perturbers:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
Here's the orbital solution I was able to generate:
Perimercury 2016 May 2.867076 TT = 20:48:35 (JD 2457511.367076)
Epoch 2016 May 3.0 TT = JDT 2457511.5 Find_Orb
M 174.16938 (2000.0) P Q
n1310.28972465 Peri. 55.50496 0.59913292 0.42885745
a 6800.31799km Node 90.81040 0.30575374 -0.90300127
e 0.9999037 Incl. 137.45454 0.73996917 0.02588405
P 395.63m H -2.3 U 18.8 q 0.65443964km Q 13599.9815km
From 5 observations 2016 Apr. 28-May 2; mean residual 0".03

IMPACT at 2 May 2016 20:40:41.61 lat -37.70498 lon 110.63521 Residuals in arcseconds:
160428 500 .02- .01- 160430 500 .03- .04- 160502 500 .00 .00
160429 500 .04+ .03+ 160501 500 .00 .02+
# Perturbers: 00000000 (unperturbed orbit); not using JPL DE
# Diameter 12167.0 km (assuming 10% albedo)

Looks like the object intersected the position of the planet Mercury less than an hour ago. Sadly Mercury is no more, it is replaced by this object.

Assuming the coordinates are intended to be geocentric, they lead to a very precise orbital solution indeed without even accounting for perturbers:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
Here's the orbital solution I was able to generate:
Perimercury 2016 May 2.867076 TT = 20:48:35 (JD 2457511.367076)
Epoch 2016 May 3.0 TT = JDT 2457511.5 Find_Orb
M 174.16938 (2000.0) P Q
n1310.28972465 Peri. 55.50496 0.59913292 0.42885745
a 6800.31799km Node 90.81040 0.30575374 -0.90300127
e 0.9999037 Incl. 137.45454 0.73996917 0.02588405
P 395.63m H -2.3 U 18.8 q 0.65443964km Q 13599.9815km
From 5 observations 2016 Apr. 28-May 2; mean residual 0".03

IMPACT at 2 May 2016 20:40:41.61 lat -37.70498 lon 110.63521 Residuals in arcseconds:
160428 500 .02- .01- 160430 500 .03- .04- 160502 500 .00 .00
160429 500 .04+ .03+ 160501 500 .00 .02+
# Perturbers: 00000000 (unperturbed orbit); not using JPL DE
# Diameter 12167.0 km (assuming 10% albedo)

Looks like the object intersected the position of the planet Mercury less than an hour ago. Sadly Mercury is no more, it is replaced by this object.

As I said before: I can't reveal my source.

Assuming the coordinates are intended to be geocentric, they lead to a very precise orbital solution indeed without even accounting for perturbers:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
Here's the orbital solution I was able to generate:
Perimercury 2016 May 2.867076 TT = 20:48:35 (JD 2457511.367076)
Epoch 2016 May 3.0 TT = JDT 2457511.5 Find_Orb
M 174.16938 (2000.0) P Q
n1310.28972465 Peri. 55.50496 0.59913292 0.42885745
a 6800.31799km Node 90.81040 0.30575374 -0.90300127
e 0.9999037 Incl. 137.45454 0.73996917 0.02588405
P 395.63m H -2.3 U 18.8 q 0.65443964km Q 13599.9815km
From 5 observations 2016 Apr. 28-May 2; mean residual 0".03

IMPACT at 2 May 2016 20:40:41.61 lat -37.70498 lon 110.63521 Residuals in arcseconds:
160428 500 .02- .01- 160430 500 .03- .04- 160502 500 .00 .00
160429 500 .04+ .03+ 160501 500 .00 .02+
# Perturbers: 00000000 (unperturbed orbit); not using JPL DE
# Diameter 12167.0 km (assuming 10% albedo)

Looks like the object intersected the position of the planet Mercury less than an hour ago. Sadly Mercury is no more, it is replaced by this object.

It's a transit of Mercury, not Nibiru. Pretty sure you knew that though.

[link to www.space.com]

Assuming the coordinates are intended to be geocentric, they lead to a very precise orbital solution indeed without even accounting for perturbers:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
Here's the orbital solution I was able to generate:
Perimercury 2016 May 2.867076 TT = 20:48:35 (JD 2457511.367076)
Epoch 2016 May 3.0 TT = JDT 2457511.5 Find_Orb
M 174.16938 (2000.0) P Q
n1310.28972465 Peri. 55.50496 0.59913292 0.42885745
a 6800.31799km Node 90.81040 0.30575374 -0.90300127
e 0.9999037 Incl. 137.45454 0.73996917 0.02588405
P 395.63m H -2.3 U 18.8 q 0.65443964km Q 13599.9815km
From 5 observations 2016 Apr. 28-May 2; mean residual 0".03

IMPACT at 2 May 2016 20:40:41.61 lat -37.70498 lon 110.63521 Residuals in arcseconds:
160428 500 .02- .01- 160430 500 .03- .04- 160502 500 .00 .00
160429 500 .04+ .03+ 160501 500 .00 .02+
# Perturbers: 00000000 (unperturbed orbit); not using JPL DE
# Diameter 12167.0 km (assuming 10% albedo)

Looks like the object intersected the position of the planet Mercury less than an hour ago. Sadly Mercury is no more, it is replaced by this object.

Troll thread.

Report

Delete

Assuming the coordinates are intended to be geocentric, they lead to a very precise orbital solution indeed without even accounting for perturbers:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
Here's the orbital solution I was able to generate:
Perimercury 2016 May 2.867076 TT = 20:48:35 (JD 2457511.367076)
Epoch 2016 May 3.0 TT = JDT 2457511.5 Find_Orb
M 174.16938 (2000.0) P Q
n1310.28972465 Peri. 55.50496 0.59913292 0.42885745
a 6800.31799km Node 90.81040 0.30575374 -0.90300127
e 0.9999037 Incl. 137.45454 0.73996917 0.02588405
P 395.63m H -2.3 U 18.8 q 0.65443964km Q 13599.9815km
From 5 observations 2016 Apr. 28-May 2; mean residual 0".03

IMPACT at 2 May 2016 20:40:41.61 lat -37.70498 lon 110.63521 Residuals in arcseconds:
160428 500 .02- .01- 160430 500 .03- .04- 160502 500 .00 .00
160429 500 .04+ .03+ 160501 500 .00 .02+
# Perturbers: 00000000 (unperturbed orbit); not using JPL DE
# Diameter 12167.0 km (assuming 10% albedo)

Looks like the object intersected the position of the planet Mercury less than an hour ago. Sadly Mercury is no more, it is replaced by this object.

Mercury ???


Oh f**k - I think with all this Nibiru crap the last week I got a little confused.


Please replace all "Nibirus" in the OP with "Mercury".

Thanks.

.

Can't reveal my source.

But from the coordinates given in the OP you can calculate the orbit and confirm the info I got.

.

Mercury ???


Oh f**k - I think with all this Nibiru crap the last week I got a little confused.


Please replace all "Nibirus" in the OP with "Mercury".

Thanks.

.

What are you doing Astro?
I thought you hated the Niburutards?

Are you trying to become there god!!

Obviously Mercury is just fine lol

Hydro and Astro 100% shills
This thread proves it.

Mercury ???


Oh f**k - I think with all this Nibiru crap the last week I got a little confused.


Please replace all "Nibirus" in the OP with "Mercury".

Thanks.

.