Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,492 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 497,763
Pageviews Today: 648,769Threads Today: 198Posts Today: 2,687
05:45 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

What’s Really Behind the Senate’s Override of Obama Veto of Saudi 9/11 Lawsuit Bill

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40608332
United Kingdom
09/29/2016 05:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
What’s Really Behind the Senate’s Override of Obama Veto of Saudi 9/11 Lawsuit Bill
KEY POINT: Why is Obama protecting Saudi Arabia? One of Obama’s top financial partners in the dirty war on Syria is Saudi Arabia, who has also paid for “off-the-books” CIA operations there. Unlike Saudi and 9/11, by definition, this is state-sponsored terrorism.

While the US media follows the red herring of this legislative drama which is Saudi Arabia, the real point of this bill – and why President Obama is so vehemently opposing it – is going completely unnoticed.

If any case was brought to court by 9/11 families to sue Saudi Arabia for ‘state-sponsored terror’ regarding the attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001, the court would find there is no real forensic case proving Saudi involvement in this event. Other problems will crop up too. For starters, at least 7 of alleged hijackers were actually found to be alive after their faces were plastered on US TV screens after 9/11. As it stands, the US government’s official story of 9/11 is so flimsy and full of holes, including the complete omission or mention of the collapse of WTC Building 7 (which was hit by nothing, and yet collapsed into its own footprint in 7 seconds) and the lack of any plane wreckage at the Pentagon (we’re meant to believe that the passenger airliner evaporated into thin air on impact, and no real CCTV footage has been provided to back the government’s own wild explanation). In actuality, the US government would love a dead-end lawsuit against Saudi Arabia which could only result in some out-of-court settlement anyway – because this would supply a nice diversion away from any further scrutiny of the US government’s bogus explanation of what really happened that day.

More to the point, however, is the real potential story here. If passed, this bill would allow a number people, particularly those in Syria, to sue the US, British, French, Dutch, Norwegian, Polish, Turkish and Saudi Arabia and Qatar too, all of who are actively involved in supplying money, equipment, arms and military training to a number of known Salafist Terrorists fighting groups in Syria.

MORE:

[link to 21stcenturywire.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 40608332
United Kingdom
09/29/2016 07:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What’s Really Behind the Senate’s Override of Obama Veto of Saudi 9/11 Lawsuit Bill
bump
Utili

User ID: 71286340
United States
09/29/2016 07:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What’s Really Behind the Senate’s Override of Obama Veto of Saudi 9/11 Lawsuit Bill
it's curious, but to me from a slightly different perspective. i wonder why congress overrid obama's veto? they're all as equally entrenched in the facade of the world
The future is not what it used to be.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 40608332
United Kingdom
09/29/2016 07:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: What’s Really Behind the Senate’s Override of Obama Veto of Saudi 9/11 Lawsuit Bill
it's curious, but to me from a slightly different perspective. i wonder why congress overrid obama's veto? they're all as equally entrenched in the facade of the world
 Quoting: Utili


I couldn't work that one out! Unless there are some real people there that actually are good! It's interesting that Obama has said that this decision will gravely affect the security of the USA - so perhaps it's all part of a big plan to unleash a bad terror attack on USA?





GLP