Guccifer 2.0 Hacked Clinton Foundation Donor Information | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69087515 Canada 10/05/2016 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Deplorable toprance1
User ID: 69391811 United States 10/05/2016 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think the hack is legit, Wikileaks has posted a link, and they are very careful posting links to other sources. There is a lot of information to sift through and the word is mum in the media and it looks like a lot of censorship on the web. Why would they not report on it and claim it is fake if they are sure it is fake? Why avoid all mention? Why censor twitter and facebook etc? I think they were all caught with their pants down, they were still congratulating themselves that Assange didn't release anything and tuning in to the debate. If Wikileaks has posted a leak, they must have already known and had a chance to verify it as legit, or maybe Assange passed it off to be release on non Wikileaks sites first. I was a bit skeptical last night, but today, with the story haven broken 24 hours ago and still silence about it, plus wikileaks linking it, I am more inclined to believe this is real and just the tip of the iceberg. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69087515 You make some very good points. Never ever, ever, ever give up!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72964394 Canada 10/05/2016 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61536747 United States 10/05/2016 09:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | IF YOU CANNOT SEE ANYTHING ABOUT THIS ANYWHERE ELSE, IT IS BECAUSE "THEY" ENGAGED THE CENSOR BOT TO WIPE IT EVERYWHERE I am getting a little bit worried, it looks like the censorship really is stopping this. They are now trying to front it as a hoax. But the problem is that all the social media posts on this topic were exploding last night, and then suddenly just froze where they were 1 hour after this broke. There is no explicable reason for this other than a massive ability to shut it all down from a central location which would never have been used if this was a hoax. Even my message window got shut off entirely, and I can't see where or how that was done. The only thing that works is the front page. Conclusion: NOT A HOAX, and the control over the web is far more vast than anyone ever expected. Guccifer 2.0 is not the Guccifer that is in jail, and he was asking for server space to host it all because it was too much. This would be expected if it was not a hoax. Someone else did this drop which is why it is Guccifer 2.0 and I suspect it is the Russians or white hats that actually provided the files, and they have to make it all look plausible (like an individual who might have problems getting enough space for all the files online.) The coincidence with this and Assange yesterday lends credibility to it all. It appears Assange used a front. Hillary and the rest of the elite scum are asking for bullets to fly their direction by blocking this, and the bullets probably won't be from the general public. They will be from a powerful entity that does not want world war 3. Someone somewhere did the hack and it was not "joe Guccifer". That much is obvious. And that someone will be far more capable of taking direct physical action than "Joe guccifer" ever could be. UPDATE: It looks like Hillary's team really is using NSA hackware against people, this time to stop this leak from spreading. The method? To attack people's computers and destroy them. The only reason I am still up is because you can't write to the ROM chip my specially configured computer runs from, but they did try to attack and kill the CPU. If I had a normal setup, the hard drive would now be gone and as it is, they already made the laptop produce a burning smell while the CPU fan went to max. They want this leak stopped at all costs, and have resorted to blowing people's computers out. Thankfully I don't have CoreVpro. This is probably why practically no locations on the web have this leak despite how huge it is. -JimStone |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61536747 United States 10/05/2016 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73077851 United States 10/05/2016 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SInce virtually everyone was harmed by this, it should be easy to find people/entities that will raise hell. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 63524020 I keep waiting for the outrage...incredibly quiet today about this info. Its overwhelming when you think about it . Stunning . They play by their own set of rules . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69058933 United States 10/05/2016 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fink might be Elliot Fink from the archived conversation involving NSA grade tracking software of trump supporters. Also have a look see for a Charles Shaw he works for google inc as a software engineer and I believe also engaged in that same conversation with david brock and elliot fink. I have yet to id ekim.. umm Charles Shaw also donated to her campaign frequently an in small amounts probably to get around donation limits though that hardly matters anymore with the DNC using a credited system so they can double dip if they like. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72964394 Canada 10/05/2016 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That would be David Brock and Elliot FInk. They are comspiring to commit murder- their chat log was hacked showing they are using some software to personally identify people online and 'Seth Rich" them. It is an uncovered plan for mass murder and has been all but scrubbed as well. Everyone needs to say alert. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61536747 Ohoooh interesting. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73106589 United States 10/05/2016 10:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72964394 Canada 10/05/2016 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61536747 United States 10/05/2016 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72964394 Canada 10/05/2016 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Deplorable toprance1
User ID: 69391811 United States 10/06/2016 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59088074 United States 10/06/2016 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69087515 Canada 10/06/2016 12:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it was a hoax, I think by now the Clinton campaign would be using it to smear Trump and Putin especially if it's fake. Whenever anything bad comes out about her, she gets indignant and turns it against Trump, right wing conspiracy, Russians. Why is this being handled by her campaign differently? That's what I would have expected her to do, but instead it is being censored in the media and on the internet. Nobody is talking about it, not even to deny it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61533442 United States 10/06/2016 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THE BACK STORY: Yesterday the image of Guccifer (marketed as Guccifer 2) did the first part of a huge data dump on the Democrats, which proves they received kickbacks from the banker bailouts and live by "pay to play". It was erroneously stated to be a Clinton foundation hack so the Clinton foundation took advantage of that and issued a "truthful" response saying it was fake. PROBLEM: it was not fake. Though it is titled a "Clinton foundation hack", the hack is broader than just a Clinton foundation hack. YES, tons of Clinton foundation documents are there, and tons of documents regarding other democrat crimes are there. I really don't know how it was done, because the data rape was so complete. It had to be the NSA that did this, and the intelligence agencies are now in a tug of war beteen the dark side and the white hat side (my guess, and it is only a guess.) There are no "insider contacts" or "rumors circulating" with this one as far as this web site goes. How do I know it is real, and how do I know there is a battle between good and evil in the intelligence agencies? SIMPLE: 1. It is extremely implausible that any individual could have nailed so much stuff. This is over a million documents in total, the type of data cache that you won't just find on a single hacked machine. This is a full spectrum data rape of an entire criminal infrastructure, (and yes, it was a criminal infrastructure) And 2.It is censored where possible. The huge black intelligence juggernaut was activated yesterday to blow it off the web. Now it is available at Atlantia online with a password of Caligula36 but if you are in the U.S. (and a few other locations) it is censored and will not come in. And it might already be censored at this location for everyone. This is going to be a big whack-a- mole game. The open public password says it all The manner in which it was posted (requiring an open public password) proves that it was getting censored when linked yesterday, and the only way to get it public was to put it in a web cache somewhere with a password that Google could not get beyond to notify the authorities it was available somewhere and had to be wiped out. THAT ALONE PROVES IT IS REAL, AND PROVES IT WAS CENSORED because to keep it available anywhere, it had to be hidden behind a password. WHY WOULD A PASSWORD BE NEEDED TO KEEP IT AVAILABLE LONGER? ANSWER: It is a primary function of Google to notify the authorities when something they are interested in gets posted. Google hits the entire (meaningful) web (including this web site) once every 8 minutes or so (and I hate that, because google does this web site no good at all, only damage.) All they have to do is tell Google to look for a string of text that only appears in what they want banned and Google will automatically provide practically instant feedback telling them when something pops up somewhere. Norobots command does not work to stop it. SO GUCCIFER(tm) HAD TO PUT THE FILES BEHIND A PASSWORD, SO GOOGLE COULD NOT NOTIFY THE AUTHORITIES. That is why this time around the Guccifer files were password protected, with an open public password. All of this means, beyond all doubt, that this data drop is the real deal. If it was fake, they'd shout it to the world and laugh at it. They would not instantly wipe it whenever it is posted, forcing "Guccifer" to keep it out of the watchful eye of Google. -JimStone |
Lucian Apollo Zalmoxe Lumina User ID: 73111457 Spain 10/06/2016 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THE BACK STORY: Yesterday the image of Guccifer Quoting: Anonymous Coward 61533442 (marketed as Guccifer 2) did the first part of a huge data dump on the Democrats, which proves they received kickbacks from the banker bailouts and live by "pay to play". It was erroneously stated to be a Clinton foundation hack so the Clinton foundation took advantage of that and issued a "truthful" response saying it was fake. PROBLEM: it was not fake. Though it is titled a "Clinton foundation hack", the hack is broader than just a Clinton foundation hack. YES, tons of Clinton foundation documents are there, and tons of documents regarding other democrat crimes are there. I really don't know how it was done, because the data rape was so complete. It had to be the NSA that did this, and the intelligence agencies are now in a tug of war beteen the dark side and the white hat side (my guess, and it is only a guess.) There are no "insider contacts" or "rumors circulating" with this one as far as this web site goes. How do I know it is real, and how do I know there is a battle between good and evil in the intelligence agencies? SIMPLE: 1. It is extremely implausible that any individual could have nailed so much stuff. This is over a million documents in total, the type of data cache that you won't just find on a single hacked machine. This is a full spectrum data rape of an entire criminal infrastructure, (and yes, it was a criminal infrastructure) And 2.It is censored where possible. The huge black intelligence juggernaut was activated yesterday to blow it off the web. Now it is available at Atlantia online with a password of Caligula36 but if you are in the U.S. (and a few other locations) it is censored and will not come in. And it might already be censored at this location for everyone. This is going to be a big whack-a- mole game. The open public password says it all The manner in which it was posted (requiring an open public password) proves that it was getting censored when linked yesterday, and the only way to get it public was to put it in a web cache somewhere with a password that Google could not get beyond to notify the authorities it was available somewhere and had to be wiped out. THAT ALONE PROVES IT IS REAL, AND PROVES IT WAS CENSORED because to keep it available anywhere, it had to be hidden behind a password. WHY WOULD A PASSWORD BE NEEDED TO KEEP IT AVAILABLE LONGER? ANSWER: It is a primary function of Google to notify the authorities when something they are interested in gets posted. Google hits the entire (meaningful) web (including this web site) once every 8 minutes or so (and I hate that, because google does this web site no good at all, only damage.) All they have to do is tell Google to look for a string of text that only appears in what they want banned and Google will automatically provide practically instant feedback telling them when something pops up somewhere. Norobots command does not work to stop it. SO GUCCIFER(tm) HAD TO PUT THE FILES BEHIND A PASSWORD, SO GOOGLE COULD NOT NOTIFY THE AUTHORITIES. That is why this time around the Guccifer files were password protected, with an open public password. All of this means, beyond all doubt, that this data drop is the real deal. If it was fake, they'd shout it to the world and laugh at it. They would not instantly wipe it whenever it is posted, forcing "Guccifer" to keep it out of the watchful eye of Google. -JimStone Well,my friend you have a few good points however..do not underestimate the power of lazyness and stupidity:))) 1.I have made atlantia.online and all the otehr sites at 123systems.net back in january 6th I needed to upgrade to an enterprise package of 75 GB storage when I hosted the first dump of Guccifer files from 2012 when he got in jail and the site demanded me to setup a password for my ftp.atlantia.online site the pass is now Caligulas36:) thanks very much for mentioning it 2.I have moved in every month the sites around the web to avoid getting caught and yes...I have anonymous access at [email protected] because that is the domain name I have also set Apache and the FTP server to accept billions of people in the same time I also got a very beefy virtual machine... 3.however,the domain name is in Romanian and most of you folks speak English therefore I needed to refer to atlantia.online for indexing and speaking purposes and on the secondary websites I no longer have anon acces therefore the pass is required Yes,I could have splitted the 7 websites on 7 virtual machines but you know..money...time...and so on |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61533442 United States 10/06/2016 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Daniel of the Rose
User ID: 73110391 United States 10/06/2016 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71752331 United States 10/06/2016 09:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8028583 United States 10/11/2016 08:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8028583 United States 10/14/2016 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8028583 United States 10/21/2016 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |