Breaking! Podesta Emails #14 from Wikileaks Just Dropped

I am Soros is going to have a lot of missed calls today

Lol I tried oo got same. Gonna try his gaff.

What is ptt.gov?

The house numbers just got to a recorded American voice that says "thank you for calling" then hangs up.

If it wasn't for Trump I'd be ashamed to call myself a NYer. Clintons and Soros are our biggest pollution problem here..pffft

So.......Why no tweet about this release?

Flagging

Thx. His actual proposal sucks, but we live in a leftie alternative universe

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Raining hard in NY.. me thinks it's Soros tears..

Does Donald Trump get invitations too to explain his economic proposals in an op-ed in the Boston Globe? If so, I will eat these words.....

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Thank you!

WikiLeaks poisons Hillary’s relationship with left

After learning how Clinton feels about them, liberals vow to push back against her agenda and appointments.

[link to www.politico.com]

LEAKS:


I'm not trying to throw you in the ditch. I just want you to stop whipping
her up beyond what she is quite capable of doing on her own.
On Mar 9, 2015 5:09 PM, "Philippe Reines" <[email protected]> wrote:

> My reaction was more than a little because I don’t want the next thing
> we read to be that Cheryl & my (and Heather’s) names were part of this,
> then not.
>
> I’d also like you to know though that last night I suggested very
> strongly to her in writing and then on the phone that if she disagreed with
> their recommendation — which at that time she was doing — I would not relay
> that back, that he/they/one of them deserved the right to make their case
> directly to her to either change her mind or know they couldn’t, that it
> can’t keep being me or Cheryl with the, HRC said X, HRC told us Y. That
> doing so will only lead people to say If only, and that she should call Joel…
> Believe me it did not go over well with her. All sorts of crazy responses,
> my favorite being, Well he can call me whenever he wants. But I’m happy I
> did, because as you know she called him first thing this morning. I’m going
> to give myself a pat on the back because I believe she needs to work with
> them directly. I’m probably as happy about it as he is. So while our
> exchange might not make it seem so, and my too-often caustic nature doesn’t
> help, I want this to succeed far more than you know. And I firmly believe
> that doing so means I shouldn’t be 50% in 50% out. Should be 100/0 or
> 0/100. It’s clear you don’t think it should be 100% in. That’s a bitter
> pill to swallow. Not because I want to, but because how much I respect you
> and how hard it is to accept that you have determined that my downsides
> have exceeded my upsides.
>
> 0% in is an extreme, but I want to be as close to that as possible. So
> it being tough to accept after nearly 13 years of waking up everyday
> working for her, you and I are in agreement. Things like this will
> occasionally make that tough, especially at the outset, but it will be far
> far easier than everyone thinks. I have told each person I’ve met
> with — John A., Jim, Jen, Kristina, who were great in reaching out — that
> if she wants to be President, I want to help her do so. And I am more than
> prepared to define help as stepping back & away to allow a new team to gel
> & function without someone saying, She doesn’t like this, she won’t go for
> that. Who cares what’s happened. The past didn’t work out too well and
> there’s far less downside to reinventing the wheel than people always say.
> Maybe there’s a better wheel. Or at worst, you end up with the same wheel
> but needed to go through that process yourself to come to that
> conclusion. I am completely serious on that point and have said it to Jen &
> Kristina on a near-daily basis. She picked the right press team, they don’t
> need me as training wheels. They need to be able to succeed the way they
> will, but occasionally fail along the way.
>
> Once we are past the worst of this, my participation should be dialed
> way back down to where you decided it to be, with clear boundaries, which
> honestly, is where I need it to be for myself.
>
>
>
> From: Philippe Reines
> Date: Monday, March 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM
> To: John Podesta
> Subject: Re: Leaks
>
> Ok.
>
> From: John Podesta
> Date: Monday, March 9, 2015 at 7:16 PM
> To: Philippe Reines
> Subject: Re: Leaks
>
> I don't condone leaks, but she has a very tough job to do tomorrow. Do
> you really think it helps get her in the right head space to tell her she
> can't trust anyone she just brought on board? Why are you fanning this with
> her? CNN thinking Andrea Mitchell is getting an interview is about the
> least of our problems. I am happy to fire someone for leaking whether they
> did or they didn't just to make the point, but let's try to get through the
> next few days.
> On Mar 9, 2015 2:26 PM, "Philippe Reines" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> With all due respect, and reluctantly to do this in front of HRC except
>> for wanting to defend myself against being labeled as a cancer - but the
>> conclusion that it is ME that has to stop "this" is really unfair. &#8206;This
>> has happened too much over the last six weeks to chalk it up to the press
>> guessing correctly. They don't even get facts correctly. Cnn guessed Andrea
>> Mitchell? Come on. That flies in the face of common sense.
>>
>> Not to mention I'm following up on a topic last night where you
>> yourself felt it enough of a problem to have warned the Secretary her
>> people yap. I didn't whip you up. You took that into consideration when
>> discussing a 24 hour delay. That never should have been a factor.
>>
>> Lastly, if you think I'm the only one on this chain bothered by this -
>> and not because I whipped them up - then I have a bridge to nowhere to sell
>> you. When I had dinner with Jim Margolis weeks ago, he broached with me
>> that he is shocked by what he's reading, is sure it's close, and fears HRC
>> is looking at him and the rest of them funny. I think that's a problem when
>> her team is looking funny at each other.
>>
>> And for anyone to be justifiably upset to not be read in earlier on our
>> current challenge, and then wonder why it's difficult to speak freely about
>> something so sensitive in large in expanded settings, is a lack of
>> self-awareness. This topic's a unique doozy, but it's not the last delicate
>> one. That someone yapped about the lamest 10%&#8206; of our conversations is
>> better than the most sensitive 10% is besides the point. But either way
>> we're going to have to agree to disagree on whether 10% is just the price
>> of doing business.
>>
>> Again, with all due respect, your reaction to me is unfair in that's
>> it's stronger than any admonition anyone else has received who is actually
>> doing something wrong.
>>
>> I agree though that being at each others' throats will get us nowhere,
>> and if you want me to keep it to myself, ok, done. But it's the underlying
>> problem that's going to be the problem, not me stating the obvious.
>>
>> With that, I'm going to sit queitly in the corner until Cheryl calls me
>> to admonish me for sending this reply and digging myself into an even
>> deeper hole with you than I already was.
>>
>> For those keeping score, that will be two more admonishment than the
>> culprit(s) have received.
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> *From: *John Podesta
>> *Sent: *Monday, March 9, 2015 4:51 PM
>> *To: *Philippe Reines
>> *Cc: *Cheryl Mills; H
>> *Subject: *Re: Leaks
>>
>> Philippe,
>> You got to stop this. The press is trading in rumors that can easily
>> originate in their own newsrooms. If someone wanted to leak juicy tidbits,
>> they have a lot more to work with than our press planning. If we are going
>> to be at each others throats before we start, we are going nowhere.
>> John
>> On Mar 9, 2015 1:13 PM, "Philippe Reines" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, this has gone too far. The email below is from Craig to Nick to me
>>> where someone knows an interview with Andrea was on the table. Seperately,
>>> Andrea just sent Nick this: "we are hearing news conference tomorrow?"
>>>
>>> &#8206;The Andrea part especially should only have been known to 10-12 people,
>>> 3 of whom are John, Cheryl & me.
>>>
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> From: Nick Merrill <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 4:04 PM
>>> To: Craig Minassian
>>> Cc: Matt Mckenna - gmail; Philippe Reines
>>> Subject: Re: CNN
>>>
>>> + PIR
>>>
>>> This is nuts.
>>>
>>> On 3/9/15, 3:59 PM, "Craig Minassian" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >This is just for you Nick but our favorite CNN source says that Brianna
>>> >(who is filling in for Erin this week) and Dan have been speculating
>>> that
>>> >HRC lined up an interview with Andrea Mitchell about emails.
>>> >
>>> >Now she obviously shouldn't be telling me this so please don't burn the
>>> >source or Madre may pay the price.
>>> >
>>> >Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>




[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Last Edited by Tucking_Fypo on 10/21/2016 09:33 AM

OMG!
[link to gateway.ipfs.io (secure)]

Here's a good one...

From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-09-18 16:56 Subject: A/S comment on emails

I just left the State Dept. where I have been working as a Virtual Fellow. A current A/S told me privately that it is a FACT that more of HRCs emails were preserved through her system than if she had used the State dept.'s. He said that in giving her email records to State in the form she recently did, they now have a much more complete historical record than they otherwise would have had. I asked if he would say it publicly, and he said he believes the press office is working on something. Ambassador Eleni Kounalakis 2500 Steiner Street, Ninth Floor San Francisco, CA 94115 [email protected] Sent from my iPad

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

A/S = Assistant Secretary = WH colluding to help cover up email scandal.

Great find!

On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:06 PM, Neera Tanden <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm not the diversity police but there is grumbling on the 4 white boys running next presidential cycle. So I recommend rolling out some people who look like the rest of America soon!

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Is this reliable though? Saw some of that stuff posted here yesterday and got the impression it was bogus??

It seems like everything that Hitlary saids or puts out has been written and rewritten for her many times, she does not have a thought of her own. could you imagine if she actually spoke off the cuff like trump does.

She is so fake, so everytime she talks just know it has been written for her.

Michelle obummer email address

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-12-31 20:47 Subject: Thanks, John - today, and every day


Today, and every day, I am so incredibly grateful that our party is made up of people like you: People who keep on pushing and innovating and moving forward until we see the progress that our country deserves. Everything we've done, and everything we'll do -- it really is all because of you. So thank you, John. Thank you for everything.

Michelle

Michelle obummer email address

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-12-31 20:47 Subject: Thanks, John - today, and every day


Today, and every day, I am so incredibly grateful that our party is made up of people like you: People who keep on pushing and innovating and moving forward until we see the progress that our country deserves. Everything we've done, and everything we'll do -- it really is all because of you. So thank you, John. Thank you for everything.

Michelle

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

NEW AD: Bernie Sanders - "Frack"

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

so this David goodfriend guy on Fox, just said, he has some emails he sent to Podesta and they have been changed by someone, then he accuses Russia, and said dont trust the emails, lol

So, now they all will come out and say the emails have been changed, and not accurate, watch and see.

He, is fake and a liar, but this will be their excuse.

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

Yes, like somebody has had the time to sit and change every e-mail. Sigh.

I don't know, it is a legit company. I got it from another site and thought to share it here. Mainly because of the charts of what would keep people in the different groups from voting.

Juicy stuff here...

Lewinsky... WJC... threats.... woooo weeee!

[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

>>> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Dominic Lowell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we add "people" after the red-line addition of "transgender" in that
>>> LGBT list? I know transgender modifies "brave men and women" but it's not a
>>> good look for that to stand on its own.


On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Lauren Peterson <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We can just change brave men and women to brave people if that works.
>>>
>>> Thanks!!
>>>


[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

McCain REALLY needs to see this. Wtf!
[link to wikileaks.org (secure)]

I'm sure it's already accounted for, but we'd really like the moderator to push people defending McCain to explain their positions in these groups. If you could tip the moderator to explore any comments on his temper, that would be great. - Done

They've been trying that tactic since the emails started to leak.