Fruit of the loom cornucopia logo never existed.

You must be an imbecile of the highest order.

:retard2:

My son is only 23 and clearly remembers the cornucopia as part of the logo. So yep mandela effect

There was never a cornucopia in the fruit of the loom logo, I am absolutely certain of it, just the fruit.I remember seeing this logo all of my childhood and I remember what I saw because I have always paid attention to details.
Your brain has a tendency to fill in blanks to make it what you expect to see in your mind (this is why if you ask ten eye witnesses to the same event what they saw their versions will all differ, memories are not accurate at all) Most people have seen pictures of cornucopias with different fruits contained in them that look just like the different fruit on the underwear logo. Look up "cornucopia" in an image search, that's what it is, a horn shaped basket of fruit.

SO what is happening exactly like the Berenstain bears is your mind is filling in a blank with that you expect it to be instead of what is. Every other time you saw a pile of different fruit like that a cornucopia was depicted, at least almost all the time..

"Stein" is very common suffix to a tribal name, but how many people's name has "stain" at the end of it? Not a whole lot, probably a made up name or pseudonym. It was always Berenstain and I know this because I always thought it was a humorous name considering the subject was about child/bears, and perhaps that was the intent, to be humorous with a pseudonym or perhaps the authors name itself inspired the book series.

And 80% or more of what he is sure he remembers accurately never happened like he remembers. Everyone has their own perception of their own reality with varying degrees of commonality with others. We all remember the fruit because it was there. Some of us remember the cornucopia because a cornucopia goes along with a pile of random fruit. Intelligence is actually a measure of how accurate the memory is, this is why dumb people flock to these "alternate reality" threads. If we have entered a parallel universe the other one never existed from our perspective, relatively speaking.

this coming from the person who things because his memory is bad and faulty and has no idea that companies change their logos ALL THE TIME that must mean life is some sort of spooky twilight zone episode

no foolin you!

do you remember seeing Nike shirts that had the Nike swoosh and the word Nike under it???

and now I see shirts that just have the swoosh but no words!!!!

Yep mandela effect

Do you even read the shit you write?

I remember "Froot"
when did it become "Fruit"??????

Some cops see and remember guns in the hands of people they shot and they are truly cure they saw a gun. It is what they are expecting to see, so their minds fill in the "unexpected" information with "expected" information. A black male on the wrong side of town reaching into his pocket ALWAYS has a gun. See what I mean?

The "swoosh" itself does NOT predate 1980. Nike sneakers prior to that date did NOT have the swoosh,they had curved bars as I recall. I remember when it was first introduced.

Yes. It's huge. It's the Orwellian One World Goverment ovetthrowing the every country and revising history and saying it's some bullshit mandela effect. Get your heads out of your asses. This is just to fuck with Gen X the last thinking generation by killing off or censoring everything normal about our childhoods so we feel confused. You're not.

[link to www.ebay.com (secure)]

Is it necessary to be a dick? Did your mother not love you?

Just a thought.... Maybe FOTL is going along with the mandella effect theory and "saying" their logo never had a cornucopia as some kind of viral marketing? It certainly has people talking about Fruit of the Loom again... A decent marketing campaign imo.

Richard Simmons was in the Fruit of the loom commercial , before he lost all of his weight. somebody call Richard.

Last Edited by Bennder on 08/25/2018 04:41 PM

Here's the commercial from 1984..

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

The logo that some of us remember, with the cornucopia,
is how I learned that particular word and definition.


I also remember questioning and being corrected on my pronunciation of Berenstein.

These are not "false memories".

Last Edited by marooned on 08/25/2018 04:56 PM

No, that's Froot Loops, the cereal that you're thinking about.

(This was de-bunked as a Mandella effect.)

During the early 1970s, the FDA filed suit against Kelloggs stating that Fruit Loops contained no fruit, and could not be labeled as such. However they could add a small amount of fruit powder and keep the name.
Rather than do that, Kelloggs just changed the spelling in the mid 1970s.

In the early 90's I had a box of custom printed t-shirts, low an behold I still have 6 T's in the box pulled one out and it's Fruit Of The Loom, with the Cornucopia right on the tag...

They changed the logo, tards....

haha you need meds.

I was born in the 70s and remember the cornucopia. They could have changed it. Possibly due to a trademark lawsuit.

Could have been that you were buying fake Fruit of the Loom garments. I've bought a few fake purses in my time. It's usually the logo they screw up to avoid 100% copyright infringement.

Maybe there was a large manufacturer of the fake ones back in the day.

dude , thats been a ME for about 2 years

No these shirts are very high quality, they were ordered from fruit of the loom directly and then sent to the silk screener.
Companies Change their logos all the time, but I have seen fruit of the loom ads with this cornucopia logo when they were getting into outerwear in magazines and print ads.

If it was erased in the timeline you wouldn't remember it because it woouldn't have existed...get s grip, this is stupid stuff

You have said it most succinctly. For those of us who see, these changes are indeed a burden.

Last Edited by Louis in Richmond on 08/25/2018 05:49 PM

Wuuuuuuuut?

It says fruit of the loin in the second image.

The point is that if you change something in the past you can cause something to be changed [or never exist] in the present.

The argument occurring here is that even though that past changed so that something now never existed, not everyone changes along with the 'timeline change' that occurred by making the change in the past--we remember the original timeline.

We remember what was.

They remember what is.

And they are not the same.

you mean like plane engines being on the front of the wings of all aircraft not under