Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,285 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,480,238
Pageviews Today: 2,464,247Threads Today: 986Posts Today: 17,579
11:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73412448
United Kingdom
03/04/2017 01:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
When they pick an ideal mate based on eye color, race, height, hair, belly, nose, hands, legs, feet, arms, voice.

They are allowing America to become a genetic junkyard. With all the ethnicellz coming into the country, they are fucking up what they desire most. Chad genes although they may have kids, eventually will have less whites to choose from as they are indeed being bred out. The recessive genes of darkies will fuck up the gene pool for men. Non whites having novelty will also cause miscegenation for women, as women choose with their hearts, and not rational objective estimations of genetic value.

Imagine girls love art, but they're advocating for Islam which destroys most art. That's what's happening today. Women like big dicks, but they don't even realize that'll be in shorter supply when the little dark men of the east grow in number. They should be aware of these things, but since they're basic, focusing on trivialities, not really that constructive psychologically, they don't prioritize it. Women don't prioritize rumination or introspection. They are primal animals who just want to fuck upwards and get to be a part of high end positions on the social hierarchy.

Dropping a red pill on them is like trying to hand over steak to a bear. Occasionally a bear will be graceful. But we all realize someone is stupid if you don't tell them what you want to hear. And the woman like the bear will probably eviscerate you. Death sentence.

I've never seen anything so irrational. The very design women have for mating is eugenic in nature. Liberalism says everyone has value. It's incongruent and contradictory.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 3981358
United States
03/04/2017 01:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
You're halfway to making a good point but still don't really understand women.

They don't mind banging ethnics if the ethnic is good looking. Look at the amount of white women lusting after Jeremy Meeks.

It's not necessarily just white genetics that they exclusively want. If any white posters here think they have more value than N!99a Meeks in the eyes of the average white women they are low IQ as fuck.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74309550
United States
03/04/2017 01:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
White women don't like blonde haired men. I read this many times and believe it is true. Blonde haired men were only above ginger in desirability to women with black or dark brown in top place.

Its sad that the Nordic race will be wiped out due to uncapped female sexual selection, in which they are lured to dark skinned, muscular pro-psycho, equatorial or levant/tropical-adopted men.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74245970
Norway
03/04/2017 01:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
Women have an evolutionary ingrained trait for outbreeding.

That was genetically profitable through the eons we wandered the planes. In small clans of apes who became ergaster who became sapiens.

Men outbreed by bringing females into their own flock, by exploiting this trait, or by simple theft or warfare.

Women outbreed by selling out both their loyalty and genitals to the exciting strangers.

Simple stuff, really.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74245970
Norway
03/04/2017 01:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
White women don't like blonde haired men. I read this many times and believe it is true. Blonde haired men were only above ginger in desirability to women with black or dark brown in top place.

Its sad that the Nordic race will be wiped out due to uncapped female sexual selection, in which they are lured to dark skinned, muscular pro-psycho, equatorial or levant/tropical-adopted men.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74309550


As said with a somewhat deeper understanding in my above post.

Evolutionary ingrained traits for outbreeding.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 70815241
United States
03/04/2017 04:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
You're halfway to making a good point but still don't really understand women.

They don't mind banging ethnics if the ethnic is good looking. Look at the amount of white women lusting after Jeremy Meeks.

It's not necessarily just white genetics that they exclusively want. If any white posters here think they have more value than N!99a Meeks in the eyes of the average white women they are low IQ as fuck.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 3981358


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71299552
United States
03/04/2017 10:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
THIS BEHAVIOR BY WOMEN IS ACTUALLY BRILLIANT

BECAUSE THEY ARE EFFECTIVELY PLAYING TWO SIDES OF THE FENCE

THEY ARE BEING COMPLETELY PRACTICAL AND EFFICIENT AND RUTHLESS

IN ORDER WORDS THEY HAVE NO MORAL CONSTRAINTS WHATSOEVER AND JUST DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO SUCCEED

BUT THEN THEY ALSO HAVE A SIMULTANEOUS MORAL FRONT AND MORAL SUPERIORITY SO THAT PEOPLE TREAT THEM WELL AND DON'T TRY TO PULL THE SAME KIND OF VICIOUS RUTHLESS PLAY TO WIN BEHAVIOR ON THEM THAT THEY DO TO THEM

AND SO THAT THEY HAVE NO SOCIAL STIGMA OR SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES

THIS IS WHILE BASICALLY BEHAVING LIKE TOTAL SOCIOPATHS AND PSYCHOPATHS IN REALITY

ALL THEIR ACTIONS ARE COVERED WITH A MORAL HALO EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE REALLY JUST AMORAL AND SELF SERVING

AND TO TOP IT ALL OFF WOMEN ARE EXTREMELY GOOD AT MAINTAINING THIS DELUSION THEMSELVES SO THAT THEY CAN HAVE A CLEAN CONSCIENCE AND STATE OF MIND EVEN WHILE BASICALLY BEING TOTAL SOCIOPATHS

THEY ARE GENERALLY NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECTED BY THE WEIGHT OF THEIR ACTIONS

THEY DON'T SUFFER NEGATIVE MENTAL CONSEQUENCES FROM THEIR BAD BEHAVIOR

MEN ARE AT A HUGE DISADVANTAGE HERE BECAUSE MANY MALES DO NOT SHARE THIS TRAIT AND ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE COMPASSIONATE AND GUIDED BY PRINCIPLES AND HONOR AND DIGNITY AND RIGHT AND WRONG

THEY ARE MUCH MORE HONORABLE ON AVERAGE

THIS IS ACTUALLY A DISADVANTAGE FOR THEM IN REGARDS TO FEMALES, BECAUSE THIS IS NOT THE GAME THAT FEMALES ARE PLAYING AND THEY ARE COMPLETELY OUTMATCHED

FEMALES ARE ACTUALLY MUCH SUPERIOR TO MALES IN THIS REGARD

FEMALES ARE EXTREMELY GOOD AT BEING COMPLETELY PRACTICAL AND RUTHLESS WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY HOLDING MORAL SUPERIORITY

I DON'T EVEN THINK THEY DO IT CONSCIOUSLY OR INTENTIONALLY OR ARE EVEN AWARE OF IT

IT'S JUST A NATURAL TALENT FOR THEM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73886868
United States
03/04/2017 10:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Women should not be liberal if they care about genetics only
[/youtube] [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]





GLP