Moon HOAX CONSPIRACY - LEM HATCH TOO SMALL! BEST DOCUMENTARY IS 1 OF OLDEST DOCUMENTARIES

Can you count 3? [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

www.youtube.com/results?sea+rch_query=rocket+works+in+vacuu​mchamber

You just sent a link to YouTube. Can you post the actual videos?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Before you understood momentum conservation law, stfu and learn first. Need a video to prove rockets work in space is a true tale of lack of common physics knowledge.

I’m sorry that understanding the huge accomplishment of America’s space missions is so offensive to you. It’s a shame that the efforts of thousands of people and the valor and courage of men who died and risked death in the goal of furthering mankind’s technology and exploration of the universe represents such an offense to you. Perhaps I should apologize for studying the facts and determining that our moon landings did, in fact, occur in spite of the ravings of a few people on the internet. But, I won’t.

Continue to believe your ridiculous blather. It’s clear evidence and fact won’t sway you. While you are at it check in with your flat earth friends and say hello.

They don’t represent rockets in space. Post them here and I’ll tell you why.

So all of a sudden space represents a different kind of vacuum?

Do tell...

Please don’t tell us that an Earth based vacuum chamber is affected by ‘gravity’...

We’re actually having some decent discourse here until people like you show up and start with the insults and name calling...

Perhaps it is you who is terribly offended?

How exactly is the chamber a vacuum when the rocket instantly pressurizes the chamber. You can see it fill up with smoke. Then you can see the smoke push the rocket as the smoke moves in the same direction as the rocket is pushing. It actually proves that rockets need external pressure to push off.

You are a piece of shameless lying shit.

Cardboard made doghouse?

Dust floating in the air?

The sun is overhead?

Shadows have various directions?

wow you must be special

they made an auto change for your name

Translated from Hoaxie: I am a perverted moran and I have no rational rebuttal, yet I most post something because I'm to stupid to realise that people will know that.

First rule of holes, dude...

It does not matter, space is not a vacuum. It is only related to as a vacuum becasue most things we send into space with humans are pressurized making it seem like space is a vacuum. Space is nearer 0 psia or zero pounds of pressure per square inch, my guess is there may actually be a slight pressure, barely measurable. Rockets will work in that environment.

Hey bumptard!
Didn't you understand the explanation the last 1.315 times it was posted over the last 5 years?

If so you are beyond hope.




Yet you cant point out a single untruth.


This statement only tells us that you are UTTERLY IGNORANT of the LM engineering.
Therefore your opinion about it is worthless.


There is no dust floating in air.


The Sun is never at zenith.


Perspective? How does it work?

Being ignorant about something isn't something to be ashamed of.
But trying to base an opinion on such ignorance is just plain stupid.




Since when is pissing off TPTB not a badge of honour?
Curiously CTers seem the be rather asymptotic in their anti-authoritarianism and skeptisicm.

Why is that?
Some sort of fringe tribalism?




You didn't offer any rebuttals

just your opinions

It does not matter, space is not a vacuum. It is only related to as a vacuum becasue most things we send into space with humans are pressurized making it seem like space is a vacuum. Space is nearer 0 psia or zero pounds of pressure per square inch, my guess is there may actually be a slight pressure, barely measurable. Rockets will work in that environment.

Hey bumptard!
Didn't you understand the explanation the last 1.315 times it was posted over the last 5 years?

If so you are beyond hope.




Yet you cant point out a single untruth.


This statement only tells us that you are UTTERLY IGNORANT of the LM engineering.
Therefore your opinion about it is worthless.


There is no dust floating in air.


The Sun is never at zenith.


Perspective? How does it work?

Being ignorant about something isn't something to be ashamed of.
But trying to base an opinion on such ignorance is just plain stupid.




Since when is pissing off TPTB not a badge of honour?
Curiously CTers seem to be rather asymptotic in their anti-authoritarianism and skeptisicm.

Why is that?
Some sort of fringe tribalism?




You didn't offer any rebuttals

just your opinions

MV8zNDY3MTM4XzgwODM2OTc5X0U5RkM2MzQx]


Rockets will work in any environment. There is no pressure at all. You don't even know momentum conservation law, your opinion is a fart.

4am? Armstrong took his first steps at 2:56 UTC which would be 10:56 pm Eastern or as early as 7:56 pm on the west coast. So you started your story with a lie.

It is also a lie that all the footage from Apollo 11 is lost. We have copies of all the footage and all that is lost is the original video piggybacked on the telemetry tapes from the EVAs only. That is likely because the tapes were written over when Memorex had a tape shortage in the 70's and NASA was then faced with the choice of reusing tapes they had copies of or not collecting data from ongoing missions and probes.

The schematics for the LM are not lost either. NASA does not own them as they didn't build it. Grumman has the schematics.

No rocks have been found to be from Earth. On the contrary they have been found to have been formed in low gravity, exposed to millions of years of cosmic rays, and have never been in contact with liquid water. Perhaps you're thinking of the rock in the netherlands? It was not given by NASA. NASA didn't give out any rocks at all in 1969. At best it was given by the US ambassador to the former prime minister. But even that can't be proven. All that is known for sure is it was found in his estate after his death and his family ASSUMED it was a Moon rock.

LOL at Collier claiming they couldn't fit through the LM hatch when there are pics and videos showing them doing just that.

Apollo's path DID take them around the thickest parts of the belts. The recent NASA video is specifically talking about testing the electronics of the new craft which are more sensitive than Apollo's. The path around the belts is also not available for interplanetary trips.



There were 9 trips there and back. And again, their trajectory took them around the thickest parts of the belts. But thanks for proving that hoaxies know the least about the subject.

Hey bumptard!
Didn't you understand the explanation the last 1.315 times it was posted over the last 5 years?

If so you are beyond hope.




Yet you cant point out a single untruth.


This statement only tells us that you are UTTERLY IGNORANT of the LM engineering.
Therefore your opinion about it is worthless.


There is no dust floating in air.


The Sun is never at zenith.


Perspective? How does it work?

Being ignorant about something isn't something to be ashamed of.
But trying to base an opinion on such ignorance is just plain stupid.




Since when is pissing off TPTB not a badge of honour?
Curiously CTers seem to be rather asymptotic in their anti-authoritarianism and skeptisicm.

Why is that?
Some sort of fringe tribalism?




You didn't offer any rebuttals

just your opinions

Isnt it interesting that a 50 year old theory gets traction? And that people are so engaged? Shills and believers alike. We have some other things worth checking out. But no, the good old moon hoax is the most important.
So in good old slayer tradition I once again give you hereby irrefutable evidence that the sjow that went down in June -69 was just that -a show.
Here is a behind the scenes film shot by NASA themselves. Very rare and will probably soon be scrubbed so enjoy while you can.

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

ONE LOVE!

Funny how you can’t find a single schematic of the LM, or the lunar rover, or the space suits themselves.

Lol.

Not even NASA has any off these as they claim they were all destroyed.

Lol.

Funny how the curators at the National Museum for Aeronautical Science won’t let anyone within 20 feet of the model of the lunar module...

What are they afraid off?

That someone might actually measure the circumference of the exit hatch?

Lol.

A 10,000 lb thrust rocket that leaves no plumage, no smoke, no debris trail and can’t even kick up a speck of moon dust...

Lol.

Not to mention the connecting tunnel between the LM and the command module.

It was only 24 inches in diameter.

How did the astronots in full drab get through that opening?

Lol.

Wut?

Still not a single photo of Earth from ‘space’?

Even with over 6,000 active ‘satellites’ allegedly orbiting the Earth?

Priceless.

The official name of the lander is the Lunar Excursion Module, LEM for short.

AT the time in 1969 they called it the LEM. Niel Armstrong used it when he used his "I'm going to step off the LEM" line

The landing pads did not even sink a bit in the moon soil. The soil under the thruster and lander is all flat.

You really are a bad person.

Funny that you lie or regurgitate lies.

That's so hoaxie of you.


Funny that you don't understand what a museum piece is.
Funny that you are ignorant of the documentation that proves beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that the hatch was not to small.

Honestly, even if Apollo was hoaxed they wouldn't make the hatch to small.
The actors have to get through it.

Duh...


So you don't know that the descent engine was throttled down in hover mode?
So you don't know that this fuel mixture produces a transparant exhaust?
So you don't know that there shouldn't be a "debris trail"?
So you you don't know that dust was picked up?
It's in the bloody film!


They didn't need to.
Yet another thing YOU DO NOT KNOW.

In my experience the more ardent the hoaxie the less they know about the subject.
Ignorant idiots, the lot of them.

Why would anybody believe that IGNORANCE can ever be a basis for a valid opinion?


And full hoaxie again.
Lie, lie, and lie some more.

Just as well that they are so entertaining.




The official name of the lander is the Lunar Excursion Module, LEM for short.

AT the time in 1969 they called it the LEM. Niel Armstrong used it when he used his "I'm going to step off the LEM" line

The landing pads did not even sink a bit in the moon soil. The soil under the thruster and lander is all flat.

You really are a bad person.

Funny that you lie or regurgitate lies.

That's so hoaxie of you.


Funny that you don't understand what a museum piece is.
Funny that you are ignorant of the documentation that proves beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that the hatch was not to small.

Honestly, even if Apollo was hoaxed they wouldn't make the hatch to small.
The actors have to get through it.

Duh...


So you don't know that the descent engine was throttled down in hover mode?
So you don't know that this fuel mixture produces a transparant exhaust?
So you don't know that there shouldn't be a "debris trail"?
So you you don't know that dust was picked up?
It's in the bloody film!


They didn't need to.
Yet another thing YOU DO NOT KNOW.

In my experience the more ardent the hoaxie the less they know about the subject.
Ignorant idiots, the lot of them.

Why would anybody believe that IGNORANCE can ever be a basis for a valid opinion?


And full hoaxie again.
Lie, lie, and lie some more.

Just as well that they are so entertaining.




The official name of the lander is the Lunar Excursion Module, LEM for short.

AT the time in 1969 they called it the LEM. Niel Armstrong used it when he used his "I'm going to step off the LEM" line

The landing pads did not even sink a bit in the moon soil. The soil under the thruster and lander is all flat.

You really are a bad person.

That took you 4 hours to compile...

Phuck off azzhole!Space is not a vacuum but your are just an ignorant bastard aren't you?

...Outer space has very low density and pressure, and is the closest physical approximation of a perfect vacuum. But no vacuum is truly perfect, not even in interstellar space, where there are still a few hydrogen atoms per cubic meter.....
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

I like duking it out with stupid it phucks like you.

No wait you bore me.

:stupidburn: