DOOM!!! Plastics and the increase in Gender bending chemicals in our environment.

Yes it is another endocrine disrupting element that started use about 50 years ago in the water supplies.

a few more are talked about in this video:

Phytoestrogens in soy, too.

Avoid avoid avoid that shit!

Thx OP!
Does anyone have stats on the gender fluid trend?
How much of an increase are we talking?

Pajamas Boys love plastic

What about men who identify as a woman but still boink women.

Has plastic affected them or are they simply lesbian men?

What about men who identify as a woman but still boink women.

Has plastic affected them or are they simply lesbian men?

There is scientific evidence that correlates the increase in endocrine disruptive chemicals very well with the increase in "gender benders" within modern society.


Research Proves 'Gender-Bending' Chemicals Affect Reproduction
November 18, 2010 | 86,161 views
1.9K

[link to articles.mercola.com]


New research proves that 'gender-bending' chemicals, which leach from human products into rivers and oceans, can have a significant impact on the ability of fish to breed. The study has important implications for understanding the impacts of these chemicals.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) affect hormones. They are found in products ranging from contraceptive drugs to liquid detergents.

They have been seeping into rivers through the sewage system for decades and alter the biology of fish, changing male fish to make them more female.

Eurekalert reports:

"Until now, there has been no solid evidence to show the long-term impact of this effect on fish in the wild -- but the new research focusing on wild roach in two UK rivers (Bourne and Arun) has provided new evidence

... It was found that intersex fish -- those that had their sexuality compromised by EDCs and which contain both male (sperm) and female (eggs) sex cells -- had their reproductive performance reduced by up to 76 percent."

Phthalates -- Exposure to phthalates can lead to incomplete testicular descent in fetuses, reduced sperm counts, testicular atrophy or structural abnormality and inflammation in newborns.

Bisphenol A (BPA) -- A common ingredient in many plastics, including those in reusable water bottles and resins lining some food cans and dental sealants, can change the course of fetal development in a way that increases your risk of breast cancer. Polycarbonate plastics contain BPA.

BPA has been detected in the umbilical cord blood of 90 percent of newborn infants tested.



What is the man made waste product that has taken over our solid waste stream in the last 50 years? it is a well know source of endocrine disruptive chemicals.

The answer is Plastics!

Plastic never break down chemically it just breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces eventually becoming so small it is eaten by zooplankton and enters the food chain and along with it those endocrine disruptive chemicals.

Plastics also absorb some very nasty chemicals like DDT, and PCB and can do so at rates millions of times higher than found in the surrounding water.

:microplastics:

bioaccumulation is also a huge problem that is being magnified by plastics. Look at the diagram below which was the way bioaccumalation happened in the past and multiply the increase by just even 10,000 ppb and see what the increase a top of the food chain becomes.

:bio-accum:

I like that an OP with a masonic avatar is asking why transgenders and not pointing to the masonic origins of transgendering. Maybe the OP is throwing up a smokescreen.

Frogs often turn hermaphroditic from toxins in their environment.

Transgender human desires are no different.

Jenner just drank too much plastic growing up as an athlete.

LOL

I thought about putting it for threads title

"Gay DOOM!!! Plastics and the increase in Gender bending chemicals in our environment."

I believe this theory but I get in tons of arguments (or laughs) with others when I say this.

The Elites ALL wear Women's dresses and engage in homosexual rituals

Over 20 years ago scientist were speaking up but the big bucks oil industry swept it under the carpet.

from:
[link to www.theecologist.org]

<50%

In 1991, a group of scientists met in Racine, Wisconsin, to discuss the effects of living in what many describe as a sea of artificial oestrogens, and issued something called the Wingspread Statement: ‘The concentrations of a number of synthetic hormone agonists and antagonists measured in the US human population today are well within the range and dosages at which effects are seen in wildlife populations,’ the scientists warned.

‘Unless the environmental load of synthetic hormone disruptors is abated and controlled, large-scale dysfunction at the population level is possible’ – which would seem to imply that social sexual choices and behaviour could be affected by exposure.

‘Many wildlife populations are already affected by these compounds,’ the scientists continued. ‘The impacts include thyroid dysfunction in birds and fish; decreased fertility in birds, fish, shellfish and mammals; decreased hatching success in birds, fish and turtles; gross birth deformities in birds, fish and turtles; [...] demasculinization and feminization in male fish, birds and mammals; defeminization and masculinization of female fish and birds; and compromised immune systems in birds and mammals.’

Five years later, Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers came out with the book Our Stolen Future, establishing that hormone effects were not only well-documented, but also subtler and more widespread than anyone had anticipated.

A major federal study on the toxicity of dioxin in the mid-1990s concluded the same thing: hormone effects are what is the most devastating to humans and wildlife.

In these same years, what used to be the lesbian and gay movement grew into the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer movement (LGBTQ), which now seems to embrace everything but heterosexuality and self-sexuality. We’ve gone a bit past David Bowie’s idea of being ‘not sure if you’re a boy or a girl’; by one estimate, there are as many as 40,000 post-operative women currently living in the United States. Because health insurance pays for these surgeries in some places, sex changes are considered by some to be normative sexual behaviour. On web meeting spots like craigslist.org, phrases such as FTM (female-to-male transsexual) or MTF (male-to-female), pre-op and post-op are now common parlance.

In 2005, with colleagues Dr Scott Kerlin and Dr Milton Diamond, Beyer presented a paper to the International Behavioral Development Symposium delineating the impact that the anti-miscarriage drug DES has had in causing intersex and transgender variations in humans.

‘Hormones are signal transducers that impact multiple systems,’ says Beyer. ‘One day we will know what biochemical pathways are involved in becoming a lesbian. At the moment we don’t know for sure, but we’re close.

‘Endocrine disruptors as a general class do cause variations in gender identity and sexual orientation through exposure in utero,’ she explains, but adds: ‘To me it’s not the answer: it’s part of the picture. We existed long before any of these endocrine disruptors existed.’

This may be true, but that does not deny a trend toward increasing gender-bending on all levels. If a whole population is increasingly affected to the point of increasing transgenderism in many people, then the ultimate result is a severely weakened species, reproductively speaking.

If, within a population, there are such visible and obvious effects as transgenderism, what are the concomitant less visible, less obvious and perhaps more serious insidious effects? For example, behavioural changes due to hormonal imbalance that make a population generally more violent, or brain chemistry alterations that lower the intelligence, judgement capability and adaptability of a population?

The visible effects such as transgenderism are ominous not in and of themselves, but because they signal far more serious effects that are going undetected.