| Users Online Now: 2,286 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 655,443 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,066,083 | Threads Today: 425 | Posts Today: 7,152 |
| 11:05 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,286 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 655,443 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,066,083 | Threads Today: 425 | Posts Today: 7,152 |
| 11:05 AM | ||
Breitbart ads plummet nearly 90 percent in three months as Trump’s troubles mount | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 69623840  United States06/07/2017 01:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71690411 United States06/07/2017 01:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Pilgrim001
 User ID: 75038853 United States06/07/2017 02:00 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 69623840 United States06/07/2017 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New York Times' Digital Subscriptions Continue To Drive Growth The New York Times Company announced solid fiscal first quarter results on May 3, as both its earnings per share and revenue came in ahead of expectations. NYT reported unprecedented growth in digital subscriptions, which helped the company stabilize its circulation revenues in the first quarter. The company’s total circulation revenues increased 11% year-over-year (y-o-y) in the quarter, with digital-only subscription revenue growing strongly at 40% y-o-y to $76 million. In addition, the company’s other revenues grew 21% y-o-y to $26 million largely due to affiliate referral revenue associated with the acquisition of Wirecutter and Sweethome (October 2016). However, headwinds in print advertising (-18%) resulted in a 7% y-o-y decline in the company’s overall advertising revenues in the quarter. Despite this continued pressure, the company’s overall revenues grew 5% y-o-y to $399 million, driven by very strong digital revenues. [link to www.forbes.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71077079 United States06/07/2017 02:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74735096  Ukraine06/07/2017 02:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Six months ago, Breitbart was riding the wave of the election, plotting an international expansion to provide a platform to spread far-right, populist views in Europe. But today, Breitbart is facing traffic declines, advertiser blacklists, campaigns for marketers to steer clear and even a petition within Amazon for it to stop providing ad services. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 69623840 There were just 26 brands appearing on Breitbart in May, down from a high of 242 in March, according to MediaRadar, which tracks ads on websites. Many conservative sites, including Townhall, The Blaze and National Review, have also had declines, although those declines are much less pronounced than Breitbart, according to MediaRadar. Breitbart’s editor and site haven’t replied to requests for comment. More broadly, Breitbart has been caught up in the escalating scandal over fake news and “unsafe” content on platforms like YouTube and Facebook. Many marketers are now tightening brand-safety guidelines. But even if Breitbart’s advertising dries up completely, it still has a billionaire benefactor in Robert Mercer so it may stick around anyway — and a commerce business that hawks T-shirts, coffee mugs and beer koozies. [link to digiday.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72085694 United States06/07/2017 02:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75040460  Denmark06/07/2017 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 70965549 United States06/07/2017 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73966839 United States06/07/2017 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Nameless the Deplorable
User ID: 73740591 United States06/07/2017 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. Strange. The hateful, nasty comments are instigated by leftists -- 'If you're going through Hell, keep going." -Winston Churchill "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times, |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72085694 United States06/07/2017 03:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. Strange. The hateful, nasty comments are instigated by leftists -- Leftists ignored Breitbart news site until Trump won. Before that, leftists were focused on their liberal news and politics websites, getting all incestuous among their own kind. They were so sure they would beat him that they didn't care about conservative media. Nice try. |
| Nameless the Deplorable
User ID: 73740591 United States06/07/2017 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. Strange. The hateful, nasty comments are instigated by leftists -- Leftists ignored Breitbart news site until Trump won. Before that, leftists were focused on their liberal news and politics websites, getting all incestuous among their own kind. They were so sure they would beat him that they didn't care about conservative media. Nice try. Not true. Leftists invaded breitbart 24/7 since he announced he was running. I have an account on Disqus...under this name...I've been on breitbart for over 2 years. Try again. -- 'If you're going through Hell, keep going." -Winston Churchill "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times, |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 69623840 United States06/07/2017 05:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. Strange. The hateful, nasty comments are instigated by leftists -- Leftists ignored Breitbart news site until Trump won. Before that, leftists were focused on their liberal news and politics websites, getting all incestuous among their own kind. They were so sure they would beat him that they didn't care about conservative media. Nice try. Not true. Leftists invaded breitbart 24/7 since he announced he was running. I have an account on Disqus...under this name...I've been on breitbart for over 2 years. Try again. -- OK. Thanks for confirming that Breitbart is fake news. Maybe that is why their advert revenue is plummeting. Wonder how long they can stay in business like that? |
| Al_Swearengen
User ID: 72409737 United States06/07/2017 05:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't go there anymore because... a) it can be liberal sometimes b) the site takes way too long to load Still eating the crust off Hillary's dirty diaper, I see. ALL HAIL HIS GRACE, DONALD OF HOUSE TRUMP, Keeper of the Borders, Father of the Walls, Deporter of illegals, Usurper of Prime Real Estate, Master of the Deal, Haver of the Best Words, Defiler of Miss Universes, Slayer of Cucks, Overlord of the Kingdoms of North America and Europe, God of Gods, King of Kings, Leader of the Human Species, Lord of the European Race and President of the Realm. Thread: A so called 'time traveler' maybe made some hits so far... Thread: liberalism really is a mental disorder (Page 2) |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72867575 United States06/07/2017 05:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If true, they brought it on themselves by failing to moderate their mostly unpleasant, bigoted, and awful comments after articles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72085694 Breitbart's intelligent, well-written journalism was hurt by allowing and tolerating crass and offensive comments. Those comments helped damage the site's reputation and gave fuel to liberal agitation toward advertisers. And advertisers don't want to be associated with sites where ugly comments appear. You are a lieing piece of shit. But you know this already. Those advertisers are cutting their own throats. |
