Divide and Conquer with the Lies of No God, False gods, Evolution and Racism. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76092695 Czechia 01/10/2018 07:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why you can Believe in Jesus Christ - Backed up with REAL Facts. Reality - The Way things actually are, NOT the way you think them or want them to be. Most people today go through life believing in a World that is made up of many big lies, this results in them making bad decisions. This work will attempt to prove what is actual and real using both Logic and verifiable evidence to establish Facts from Fictions. Rebuke the LIES of Satan Using the Truth, The Word of God. Word of God = King James Bible There is NO GOD. - Isaiah 45:21-23 The Big Bang theory. - Genesis 01:31 - 2:01 Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. - Genesis 01:27 Aliens exist from other worlds. - Acts 17:22-32, Acts 19:35 There is no life after Death. - John 05:29, Mat 27:53 There is no Hell or Heaven. - Luke 16:23, Acts 1:11 It is Good for people to Tolerate Sin. - Romans 01:18-02:29, Luke 17:29 Abortion is not murder. - Exodus 21:22-23 Adultery is O.K. (Oval office) - John 8:3-8:11 Pornography is not the same as Adultery, and harms nobody. - Matthew 05:27-5:29, 2 Peter 2:14 We can’t trust God’s Word because we don’t really know what it is. - Psalm 12:06, Matthew 24:35, 2 Corinthians 11:3-4 If we can’t trust in God, then we must trust ourselves as God instead. - Genesis 03:04-05, Romans 05:01, Romans 10:02-04 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76092056 United Kingdom 01/10/2018 07:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Divide and conquer the classic tried and tested method still very much in full swing. Black vs white, liberal vs conservative, rich vs poor, etc. Everyone fighting each other when everyone should unite against the real enemies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76102793 United States 01/11/2018 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73269883 Belgium 01/13/2018 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72531636 United States 01/13/2018 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43400322 United States 03/31/2018 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73269883 Belgium 03/31/2018 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72531636 United States 03/31/2018 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol I mean of course we will, everything uses the same base genome. Evolution is more proven by D.N.A, E.R.V counts, and Fossil record lining up and saying the exact same things, and observation of evolution (new phylum of bacteria.) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73269883 Belgium 04/01/2018 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol I mean of course we will, everything uses the same base genome. Evolution is more proven by D.N.A, E.R.V counts, and Fossil record lining up and saying the exact same things, and observation of evolution (new phylum of bacteria.) Exactly. I mean, the theory is as solid as a rock. For science |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72531636 United States 04/01/2018 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol I mean of course we will, everything uses the same base genome. Evolution is more proven by D.N.A, E.R.V counts, and Fossil record lining up and saying the exact same things, and observation of evolution (new phylum of bacteria.) Exactly. I mean, the theory is as solid as a rock. For science Sorry that it is well tested and verified a million times over by different fields of science. Our understanding of evolution might change, but evolution isn't going anywhere. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73269883 Belgium 04/01/2018 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73269883 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol I mean of course we will, everything uses the same base genome. Evolution is more proven by D.N.A, E.R.V counts, and Fossil record lining up and saying the exact same things, and observation of evolution (new phylum of bacteria.) Exactly. I mean, the theory is as solid as a rock. For science Sorry that it is well tested and verified a million times over by different fields of science. Our understanding of evolution might change, but evolution isn't going anywhere. Don't feel sorry for me, I feel sorry for you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72531636 United States 04/01/2018 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 I mean of course we will, everything uses the same base genome. Evolution is more proven by D.N.A, E.R.V counts, and Fossil record lining up and saying the exact same things, and observation of evolution (new phylum of bacteria.) Exactly. I mean, the theory is as solid as a rock. For science Sorry that it is well tested and verified a million times over by different fields of science. Our understanding of evolution might change, but evolution isn't going anywhere. Don't feel sorry for me, I feel sorry for you. I don't follow a baseless religion with no evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73269883 Belgium 04/02/2018 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry that it is well tested and verified a million times over by different fields of science. Our understanding of evolution might change, but evolution isn't going anywhere. Don't feel sorry for me, I feel sorry for you. I don't follow a baseless religion with no evidence. Would you care to elaborate what you do follow? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74072774 Czechia 04/05/2020 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58382313 Serbia 05/04/2020 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Divide and Conquer advances to new levels. Those that Believe the CoVid19 Plandemic and Wear a Mask in public . VS Those that want to breath without a mask and think that a mask will not stop a Virus that is Endemic(everywhere in people till the end of time). Those that think it is Safe to go back to Work and open all businesses. Vs Those that think House Arrest and keeping everyone at home and socially distance from each other is prudent, and following orders from authority figures who have been destroying them and Country/Sates/Cities for decades. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78247809 Australia 05/05/2020 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol Wrong. We share about 85% of our genes with mice. It should be obvious to you that mice are closer to humans than bananas. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77762685 Belgium 05/06/2020 08:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol Wrong. We share about 85% of our genes with mice. It should be obvious to you that mice are closer to humans than bananas. Ofcourse, how silly of me. Because we all came from one replicator cell. Amazing stuff actually. |
dogman17
User ID: 62392662 United States 05/06/2020 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Satan is the Head of the One World Religion and Government, he uses the lies of Atheism, False gods, Evolution and Racism to divide people with Religion, Cultural and Physical Differences because he knows a people / house / group divided will pose little opposition to his plans. Quoting: The New World Order Lies 41763330 By Controlling the Governments and Corporations that "educate" and "inform" the Public through Schools, Television, Movies, Music, Web Sites, Printed Books and Magazines Peoples Minds and Opinions are Manipulated. Attack the Truth, Discredit and Replace the Authorized King James Bible with Hundreds of New Age Counterfeits that Remove, Change and create Doubt in God and his Word. When People no longer have a foundation of Truth, the Lies they are told are much harder to discern and recognize as lies. -Reducing God to a myth -Replacing God with Manufactured False Religions (cults) -Making Creation of Everything into a Theory -Classifying Humans as Animals -Popularizing Subjective Truth (opinion) over Absolute Truth (facts). When people accept and believe the lies. Getting People to fear and fixate on Differences that have been taught/learned by a Mind Control Program using the Media Industrial Complex to destroy Christian Values. -Replacing God with Self Worship and/or Obedience to Men -Abortion (Genocide of people one Baby at a time) -Fornication (Sex is reduced to a Animalistic Act) -War (Killing people is Fine, since they are just Animals) -Government Control over Lives, Liberties and Property have replaced Family (Inherited Rights) -Love of Self and things have replaced Love for other People -Fear, Public examples are endless of those who fight Evil and are Persecuted -Race, People that look, act or believe different are worth less Thread: Government Education Camps, Destroying Lives through promoting Lies and preaching absurdities. Government Education Camps, Destroying Lives through promoting Lies and preaching absurdities. An Enemy is just someone who has been taught to hate, and has Evil filling their Hart and Mind where Love should reside. It's the attack of the religionists. Just don't make anything up. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78247809 Australia 05/07/2020 01:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So Archosaurs aren't real? The base skeletal strutcutre and it's similarities between of all Archosaurs is just coincidence? The D.N.A supporting the exact same story the fossil record shows in context to Archosaurs is just fake? Chickens having disabled genes for a raptor's mouth, wing claws, and long tail exist for no reason? Crocodiles having disabled genes for feathers is just there for no reason? Give me a break. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72531636 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol Wrong. We share about 85% of our genes with mice. It should be obvious to you that mice are closer to humans than bananas. Ofcourse, how silly of me. Because we all came from one replicator cell. Amazing stuff actually. No one uses the redundant term 'replicator cell' but yes, the current consensus is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. Why? You see a problem with that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78891075 Russia 05/08/2020 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
JoeNobHead
User ID: 78820955 United States 05/08/2020 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At least I don't believe in some magical god, sitting in the clouds, that will send me to hell to burn and burn for all time, because he loves me... I believe in science NOT religion. Giving me bad karma for that, is anti-religious (you're passing judgement) I am just a man. Of no significance. Who found religion to be full of lies, and wrong doing, conflicted teachings I understand microwave communications. I do not stand for the NWO, it sucks. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77762685 Belgium 05/09/2020 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73269883 You might also want to note that we share +60% of our genes with bananas and mice. On top of that we share a whopping 96% of our genes with chimps. This being said, it is as clear as water that evotardism is real. For science, for honor and for truth. lol Wrong. We share about 85% of our genes with mice. It should be obvious to you that mice are closer to humans than bananas. Ofcourse, how silly of me. Because we all came from one replicator cell. Amazing stuff actually. No one uses the redundant term 'replicator cell' but yes, the current consensus is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. Why? You see a problem with that? I have a problem with that yes. It is called gullibility. It is also called nonsense. And you have no evidence that this actually occured. Therefore, I have a problem with that. Very scientific, as always. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78895283 Australia 05/10/2020 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78247809 Wrong. We share about 85% of our genes with mice. It should be obvious to you that mice are closer to humans than bananas. Ofcourse, how silly of me. Because we all came from one replicator cell. Amazing stuff actually. No one uses the redundant term 'replicator cell' but yes, the current consensus is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. Why? You see a problem with that? I have a problem with that yes. It is called gullibility. It is also called nonsense. And you have no evidence that this actually occured. Therefore, I have a problem with that. Very scientific, as always. Your opinion is worthless. Any idiot can point to a scientific theory and call it gullibility/nonsense. Can you explain why? Can you refute it? Rhetorical question. I know you can't. There is evidence for common ancestry. That's why it's the consensus. ERV's are an excellent example. I've already explained them to you, but I'll do it again for other people. ERVs (Endogenous retroviruses) are genes that viruses insert into the germline of an organism, which are passed to offspring. ERV's are inserted at a random position out of billions, meaning it is extremely unlikely for two organisms to share an identical ERV unless they inherited it from a common ancestor. All animals share ERV's. The amount of ERV's two species share corresponds perfectly with how close they are on the proposed evolutionary tree, which corresponds perfectly with the nested hierarchies we observe in taxonomy, which corresponds perfectly with the order in which different clades appear in the fossil record. You may not consider this proof, but if you don't think this is evidence, you don't understand it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77762685 Belgium 05/10/2020 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77762685 Ofcourse, how silly of me. Because we all came from one replicator cell. Amazing stuff actually. No one uses the redundant term 'replicator cell' but yes, the current consensus is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. Why? You see a problem with that? I have a problem with that yes. It is called gullibility. It is also called nonsense. And you have no evidence that this actually occured. Therefore, I have a problem with that. Very scientific, as always. Your opinion is worthless. Any idiot can point to a scientific theory and call it gullibility/nonsense. Can you explain why? Can you refute it? Rhetorical question. I know you can't. There is evidence for common ancestry. That's why it's the consensus. ERV's are an excellent example. I've already explained them to you, but I'll do it again for other people. ERVs (Endogenous retroviruses) are genes that viruses insert into the germline of an organism, which are passed to offspring. ERV's are inserted at a random position out of billions, meaning it is extremely unlikely for two organisms to share an identical ERV unless they inherited it from a common ancestor. All animals share ERV's. The amount of ERV's two species share corresponds perfectly with how close they are on the proposed evolutionary tree, which corresponds perfectly with the nested hierarchies we observe in taxonomy, which corresponds perfectly with the order in which different clades appear in the fossil record. You may not consider this proof, but if you don't think this is evidence, you don't understand it. Very nice. And thats how goo turned into you. Fascinating belief. Selective scepticism at its finest, as always. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78895283 Australia 05/11/2020 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78247809 No one uses the redundant term 'replicator cell' but yes, the current consensus is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. Why? You see a problem with that? I have a problem with that yes. It is called gullibility. It is also called nonsense. And you have no evidence that this actually occured. Therefore, I have a problem with that. Very scientific, as always. Your opinion is worthless. Any idiot can point to a scientific theory and call it gullibility/nonsense. Can you explain why? Can you refute it? Rhetorical question. I know you can't. There is evidence for common ancestry. That's why it's the consensus. ERV's are an excellent example. I've already explained them to you, but I'll do it again for other people. ERVs (Endogenous retroviruses) are genes that viruses insert into the germline of an organism, which are passed to offspring. ERV's are inserted at a random position out of billions, meaning it is extremely unlikely for two organisms to share an identical ERV unless they inherited it from a common ancestor. All animals share ERV's. The amount of ERV's two species share corresponds perfectly with how close they are on the proposed evolutionary tree, which corresponds perfectly with the nested hierarchies we observe in taxonomy, which corresponds perfectly with the order in which different clades appear in the fossil record. You may not consider this proof, but if you don't think this is evidence, you don't understand it. Very nice. And thats how goo turned into you. Fascinating belief. Selective scepticism at its finest, as always. That's not even a coherent response to what I just said. ERV's don't explain how one thing turns into another. Damn it, you're stupid. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77762685 Belgium 05/13/2020 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77762685 I have a problem with that yes. It is called gullibility. It is also called nonsense. And you have no evidence that this actually occured. Therefore, I have a problem with that. Very scientific, as always. Your opinion is worthless. Any idiot can point to a scientific theory and call it gullibility/nonsense. Can you explain why? Can you refute it? Rhetorical question. I know you can't. There is evidence for common ancestry. That's why it's the consensus. ERV's are an excellent example. I've already explained them to you, but I'll do it again for other people. ERVs (Endogenous retroviruses) are genes that viruses insert into the germline of an organism, which are passed to offspring. ERV's are inserted at a random position out of billions, meaning it is extremely unlikely for two organisms to share an identical ERV unless they inherited it from a common ancestor. All animals share ERV's. The amount of ERV's two species share corresponds perfectly with how close they are on the proposed evolutionary tree, which corresponds perfectly with the nested hierarchies we observe in taxonomy, which corresponds perfectly with the order in which different clades appear in the fossil record. You may not consider this proof, but if you don't think this is evidence, you don't understand it. Very nice. And thats how goo turned into you. Fascinating belief. Selective scepticism at its finest, as always. That's not even a coherent response to what I just said. ERV's don't explain how one thing turns into another. Damn it, you're stupid. Exactly. I am stupid and you believe to be the offspring of a primate, which was the offspring of another organism and go all the way back to the first replicator cell. This is an immense leap of faith you are taking without any evidence that this actually occured. And yes, I know you believe that you are an ape. No need to confirm the obvious, I am fully aware. And yes, evolution theory has been refuted many times since it was concocted, by different branches of science. But you know very well what you are left with once evolution theory is merely another theory. Evolution theory is by its very definition based upon random chance events. You know very well this is not the greatest position to defend yet you do it so vigorously, why? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78895283 Australia 05/14/2020 02:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78895283 Your opinion is worthless. Any idiot can point to a scientific theory and call it gullibility/nonsense. Can you explain why? Can you refute it? Rhetorical question. I know you can't. There is evidence for common ancestry. That's why it's the consensus. ERV's are an excellent example. I've already explained them to you, but I'll do it again for other people. ERVs (Endogenous retroviruses) are genes that viruses insert into the germline of an organism, which are passed to offspring. ERV's are inserted at a random position out of billions, meaning it is extremely unlikely for two organisms to share an identical ERV unless they inherited it from a common ancestor. All animals share ERV's. The amount of ERV's two species share corresponds perfectly with how close they are on the proposed evolutionary tree, which corresponds perfectly with the nested hierarchies we observe in taxonomy, which corresponds perfectly with the order in which different clades appear in the fossil record. You may not consider this proof, but if you don't think this is evidence, you don't understand it. Very nice. And thats how goo turned into you. Fascinating belief. Selective scepticism at its finest, as always. That's not even a coherent response to what I just said. ERV's don't explain how one thing turns into another. Damn it, you're stupid. Exactly. I am stupid and you believe to be the offspring of a primate, which was the offspring of another organism and go all the way back to the first replicator cell. This is an immense leap of faith you are taking without any evidence that this actually occured. And yes, I know you believe that you are an ape. No need to confirm the obvious, I am fully aware. And yes, evolution theory has been refuted many times since it was concocted, by different branches of science. But you know very well what you are left with once evolution theory is merely another theory. Evolution theory is by its very definition based upon random chance events. You know very well this is not the greatest position to defend yet you do it so vigorously, why? "This is an immense leap of faith you are taking without any evidence that this actually occured". I just gave you extremely good evidence but you ignored it. You don't want to see the evidence, so you stick your head in the ground like an ostrich. It's not a leap of faith to think something is PROBABLY true when all the evidence points to it. "And yes, evolution theory has been refuted many times since it was concocted, by different branches of science. But you know very well what you are left with once evolution theory is merely another theory." Evolution theory has NEVER been refuted you liar. That's why it's still the consensus. If it was, you could refute it right now, and you'd win a Nobel prize. You can't refute it. You can't even form a coherent argument against it. What do you mean 'merely another theory?' Special relativity is a theory, and we use that to put satellites in orbit. Scientific theories are the highest level an idea can reach, and they remain theories even when they are proven. "Evolution theory is by its very definition based upon random chance events. You know very well this is not the greatest position to defend yet you do it so vigorously, why?" I think evolution theory IS the best position to defend. That's why I'm defending it. Do you agree that some things in nature are random? Meiosis, radioactive decay, mutation etc. If you agree those things are random, then why shouldn't a scientific theory say they are random? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72531636 United States 05/18/2020 12:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78926179 United States 05/18/2020 01:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You do know one of the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah was race mixing/"lusting after strange flesh"? Biblically speaking, it is perpetual adultery=capital sin. Ranted, I think the Watchers are largely behind the race mixing propaganda as revenge against Noah's descendants. Noah, Was the first natural blue eyed, white skinned man. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74072774 Czechia 05/19/2020 05:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |