Driverless cars and trucks? Major effing doom - PREPARE TO BE SICK ALL OF THE TIME!!

There are a variety of products that produce negative ions, including clothing.

Even if it was adequate it doesn't solve half the problem because 99% of the people won't be aware of those remedies or realize they need one, so they will become ill.

Living in a society where 99% of the people are sick would have a lot of challenges.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/17/2017 11:28 PM

The main source of the problem are the towers which will be using an increasing amount of energy thereby producing even more positive ions.

Those positive ions get neutralized by negative ions in the air that could have been used by our body. IOW the concentration of negative ions in the air becomes far less.

It's sort of like creating distilled air.

So you think radio and microwave transmissions are by positive ions in the air rushin to and fro?
So it's not at speed of light then, or are these rushing ions now each approaching infinite mass due to velocity?

Oh that's right. you only know what's been posted on the internet because you can't lie on the internet I guess.

There are lots of negative ions in the air where there is moisture and agitation of the air, especially after a thunderstorm. Our bodies attract them and use the negative ions.

But where there is a source of positive ions being generated, some of the negative ions are attracted to them instead. This lowers the concentration of negative ions in the air.

That's why near waterfalls there are many thousands of negative ions. But in an office with lots of electronics there may be close to none.

So to answer your question, no the positive ions don't float aimlessly, they are attracted to negative ions and vice versa.

So it's not mere chance that the negative ions would be neutralized.

The plan by TPTB is to increase positive ion output as a side effect of increasing their usage of WiFi and/or 5G.

The negative ion count is already low in cities. These new plans will lower them even more.

It's like having distilled air. Distilled water isn't good for our health long term because the ions are missing. Distilled air is also not good for us.

It's not that I "think" there are positive ions being generated from cell towers. Those ions can be measured and people have measured them.

It's not necessary to understand every aspect of electricity to determine that the cell towers are massive positive ion generators. Like I said they can be and they are measured.

If you can disprove that, then you'd be onto something. But the opposite has already been proven, so you're out of luck.

We appreciate your attempt to change the topic onto something irrelevant, nevertheless.

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

“In those days people will seek death but will not find it. They will long to die, but death will flee from them!”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭9:6‬ ‭NLT‬‬
[link to bible.com]

Just like GMOs pesticides vaccine fluoride ect. The slaves will get used it!

You are spewing total bullshit.

Good! You collectively chose these. masters of evil so STFU!

That is one hell of a cogent argument you've got there. /sarcasm

Try contradicting any of these arguments:

1) The positive ions released from cell towers are measurable. You can see folks on YouTube with their ion measuring devices. So this is "known fact #1"

2) known fact #2 is that positive ions intercept negative ions that would otherwise penetrate our skin. That's basic chemistry - negatives and positives attract. We already have a bad ratio of too many positives due to the electrical pollution in the air. Cranking up the cell towers with 5G or WiFi signals will intensify the neutralization of negative ions.

3) Known fact #3 is your body makes trillions of ionic exchanges every second.

Therefore if you overwhelm the balance of the plus and minus ionic exchanges by lowering the amount of negative ions our skin absorbs into your body, it's going to throw off your health.

I know, right?

If a cloud of positive charged ions comes in contact with a person in a negative mood, it's the end of the world, yes, really.

GMOs by themselves have the ability to collapse the social order of the United States. But these cell towers will bring the collapse about more quickly.

Our cells require electricity to function properly. The ions from the air provide for some of that. By reducing the amount of negative ions in the air with tens of thousands of towers, it will have the effect of making people sicker, much sicker.

There are many people today who are already sick. The cell towers and their phones are a contributing factor to their sickness.

Each additional reduction of negative ions from the air is making it worse for more people.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 12:16 AM

Who else is sick of the cowardly pajamas boy botches whining all the time ever f-cking day ....instead of being Men and fighting back!

You can pry the steering wheel from MY COLD DEAD HANDS!

5 stirs

Now it's your turn to refute these arguments since you haven't provided a lick of useful information yet to refute these facts:

1) The positive ions released from cell towers are measurable. You can see folks on YouTube with their ion measuring devices. So this is "known fact #1"

2) Our skin absorbs negative ions.

3) known fact #3 is that positive ions intercept negative ions that would otherwise penetrate our skin. That's basic chemistry - negatives and positives attract. We already have a bad ratio of too many positives due to the electrical pollution in the air. Cranking up the cell towers with 5G or WiFi signals will intensify the neutralization of negative ions.

4) Known fact #3 is your body makes trillions of ionic exchanges every second.

Therefore if you overwhelm the balance of the plus and minus ionic exchanges by lowering the amount of negative ions our skin absorbs into your body, it's going to throw off your health.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 12:28 AM

FYI, the positive ions remove the negative ions from the air. It's not that the positive ions come into contact with us and get absorbed. It's the negative ions that are absorbed. The positive ions might be repulsed. IDK.

The key here is that the lack of adequate numbers of negative ions inside our body has a deleterious effect on the body. Conversely, an abundance of negative ions produces a feeling of well being in people. Think of what it is like next to a waterfall, near the beach when big waves are crashing, or after a thunderstorm. In each case, there is an abundance of negative ions.

You apparently believe that radio actually sprays particles into the air.
An ion is a charge atom or molecule, and you believe that communication is essentially spray painted and believe that these charged particles can fly instantly accross states and through solid matter like trees and walls.

Thats not how it works, sorry.

I GET IT, the proof is the claim itself.

Among normal people, it's called a delusion.

Machines have sensors which are coded to run off logic based algorithms to detect possible collisions and objects blocking designated pathways, a machine has an average probability of detecting and avoiding accidents more than a human average could ever achieve.

This isn't something to be afraid of but something to encourage for better design, the amount of drunk driving accidents would be cut down to zero due to drunks not being the ones who drive, car collisions due to the incompetent would also be cut down drastically if not to zero.

We would enter an age where if such an accident did occur it would be something of a novelty, something those of our current generation would say "Hey remember when people used to drive and cause all of those wrecks?" It would also further the use of electric vehicles cutting down greenhouse gases and other types of hazardous issues.

It would also save car owners hundreds if not thousands of dollars due to the vehicles having to be made to last and also the safety expectation and assembly of said vehicle. As well as insurance costs which would be cut down so much most car insurance plans would be economically unfeasible due to human error not being a factor, the people liable would be the vehicle technicians and auto manufacturer.

The amount of engineering jobs would skyrocket and the fact we would need people in factories to make these parts or at least supervise the machines that make them would cause a job increase.

Most of these cars would actually be assembled here in the United States mainly due to let's say Elon Musk's Tesla Motors and so many other Electric and non electric vehicle companies being based here.

I do agree it is strange to see and it will be very hard to get used to because most of us seeing this technology either drive or have been in a vehicle that solely relies on a human driver. Only time will tell, but I think is a positive step for our species if done right.

Maybe you are retarded. I've said multiple times that the positive ions that are emitted by the cell towers have been MEASURED. Do you know what the word measured means? So whatever theory you have about the price of tea in China is irrelevant.

It is the moisture in the air that gets charged by the tower's activity.

If you think ions can't pass through objects, I just don't know what to tell you.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 12:38 AM

the dark power we are facing is far greater than
the weirdest conspiracy glp freak has ever
imagined.

IOW you refuse to make an attempt to refute the claims I've made. There are only four. Surely you can find a fault with one of them.

But you can't. They are basic known facts. All you have presented thus far are insults.

It is amazing to me how some people are so stuck in their heads about something.

Your response has been to talk about passenger safety by avoiding car accidents when the topic here has absolutely zero to do with car accidents. It's enough to make me pull my hair out!

Is this a bot response from a shill organization? It sure looks like it. Otherwise it's about as stupid as one could get.

The topic here is about how the positive ion pollution is going to hurt everyone's health, it is not about car accidents! FFS!

you must own stock in the product.
every new convenience promises the same rosie
picture, . .but there are always unforeseen
consequences.
there are other solutions that don't require
more technocracy to rule our lives.

"Driverless vehicles" my ass, you are talking about 200 horsepower robots on the hoof controlled by nothing human. Millions of them run by creatures with zero skin in the game at best, political agenda at worst.

How would you feel about robotic guns that knew better than you who not to shoot today - all for your protection of course.

What is your source for this argument? Wired? I would like to see the source of your claims, because with this type of thinking you're basically claiming I need to be afraid of using my toaster or microwave. At least I actually provide a statement of logic which has so many sources of evidence it's not even funny yet when I look up ion emission i'm not finding any credible sources so please by all means show your work.