Driverless cars and trucks? Major effing doom - PREPARE TO BE SICK ALL OF THE TIME!!

"Unless those days were shortened no flesh would be saved alive."

You talk about the WannaCry virus, how you gonna feel when you find out a week later that your car drove itself to a crime scene while you were sleeping.

and they all run active RADAR.

[link to oceanservice.noaa.gov (secure)]

[link to blog.ucsusa.org]

[link to www.afdc.energy.gov (secure)]


Why is it that these sources that I have posted,which have spent millions of dollars on this type of research aren't mentioning ion emission?

Hmmm, maybe because you're following unreliable sources or yet making things up.

There is nothing wrong with electric vehicles besides the fact that a lot of the energy used to charge their batteries comes from fossil fuels, other then that, there is nothing dangerous about them for us or our environment.

Even if some sort dangerous particle were emitted, your body would never be able to tell because the damage would be so insignificant that you would go your whole life and not be effected.

Expand on exactly what you mean by this?

Guess how they will be controlled?
Wireless!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or 5G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You don't really have any idea how driverless cars work, do you?
They must be autonomous and work even if grid power goes down.
Otherwise there would be mass auto crashes every time there was a power, wifi or cellular outage.

So it's "turtles all the way down" for you then?

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 01:36 AM

The world of evil is over : Welcome to Armageddon

Not gonna happen

EMP will shut it all off. Somebody or something is going to throw the switch and shut it all off. JMHO. No proof.

Proof?

Good - I will invent faraday cage style hats and undergarments and get RICH!

The stupid is stupifying.

How many times do you need to be told that positive ions can be measured at cell tower locations?!?

Since they can be measured it makes no difference if you can find a million articles that don't mention the generation of positive ions from cell towers.

Do I need to find an article for you that says positive ions are attracted to negative ions? What if a million articles don't mention that fact either? Does that make the attraction untrue?

There are far too many people in this world who appear to have little or no ability to think for themselves even the most basic ideas.

Do you need a study that says hot stoves can burn your fingers? Or would a million studies not mentioning how hot stoves burn fingers mean that in fact that hot stoves don't burn fingers?

It's a widely known fact that the air contains negative ions. If you have a tower that is creating positive ions in the air's moisture and the air also contains negative ions, do you need a study to grasp that the many of the negative and positive ionic water molecules will find each other and neutralize each other?

Now put on your thinking cap. I's common knowledge that waterfalls, large ocean waves, and thunderstorms generate lots of negative ions. it's also common knowledge that all three of those natural wonders promote good feelings.

In contrast, the dry wind Sirocco or Santa Ana Winds are known to make people go crazy and commit crimes according to collected statistics. Those winds have very low negative ion levels.

You also have to admit that inside our body, there are trillions of ionic reactions going on every second. We could say that ionic reactions are the real lifeblood of the human body. If the ionic reactions stopped for one second we'd probably drop dead instantly.

If our skin absorbs negative ions, there must be a purpose behind it. (This is an example of where you need to start thinking for yourself instead of solely relying on studies.) Thus if those negative ions aren't there, it's going to have a bad effect on the body.

If you fail to attempt to refute what is written here and go off on some tangent instead, your comments might be removed. That's because I'm sick and tired of seeing all sorts of extraneous comments while the simple arguments I've made are simply ignored.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 02:18 AM

You'll get to prove it to yourself, since I have no desire to get into it with you with your nose pickin' attitude.

If you're alive in ten years, you're going to be a victim of this as will everyone else. You'll discover all your family and friends are also sick. That's when you'll know I was right.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 02:10 AM

You can go on amazon or elsewhere and purchase an ion measuring device. There are probably scores of different devices available. Then you can measure the positive ions in the air around cell towers.

Then go to a waterfall and measure the ions there.

Or you can go watch videos of others using those devices and measuring the ions in the air.

As was mentioned before either in this thread or another, it was either Wired or Forbes that discussed the coming WiFi and/or 5G cell towers. I don't remember which website had the article.

I've given a fuller reply to what are essentially your non sequiturs elsewhere.

You should be afraid of your microwave. It's a massive positive ion machine right there in your kitchen. It also instills biologically harmful frequencies into your food and water.

Take a reading of your food before you zap it. It's best to use fresh produce for this experiment rather than packaged or previously canned food. Then test it again after you've zapped it.

Last Edited by Booger Cancer on 07/18/2017 02:17 AM

Will these be the same sort of towers which drop our phone calls every so often? I could just imagine cruising along at 65 or 70 and suddenly the signal goes kaput. Just think - - dead stopped in the middle of the freeway and an 18-wheeler is bearing down on you......

Your sources are Forbes and Wired.....Wow, ok well in the world I live in and the way I base my opinions on subjects like these are by actually researching articles and studies put out by reputable institutions, where as Forbes and Wired on not reputable in this type subject due to so many other established sources that actually have scientific data pointing to the contrary.

So in layman's terms, I'm not going to take the opinion of an internet blogger's post from Forbes and Wired who's sources are bullshit or inconclusive, compared to that of scientists that work for NOAA and other types of environmental institutions that actually show their work and have had millions of dollars funded into their programs and spent decades just to record data that shows evidence that makes your argument pretty damn ridiculous and unfounded.

And to mention the cell phone towers, everything puts off radiation, it's the universe, it's existence there is going to be radiation, that's logic and a shit ton of evidence to back it up, BUT, there isn't any conclusive data to even suggest that cell phone towers produce harmful radiation against humans, there just isn't.


Therefore your claim that cell phone towers can produce cancer causing radiation is not only false due to no evidence to back it up, but that type of misinformation is dangerous to spread to people, it's like you want us to go back to colonial era tech and live like clothed chimps that aren't progressing in any way and just treat technology like some sort of witchcraft.

Here are some sources to show how unfounded your claims are, quit being a Technophobe and get used to the times.

P.S These are peer reviewed where as Forbes and Wired are not. BTW who puts fresh produce in a fucking microwave?


[link to www.cancer.org (secure)]

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

[link to www.fcc.gov (secure)]

[link to www.ehs.harvard.edu (secure)]

They'll probably blame it on legal marijuana. Or Russians.

The worst part of this isnt ion exposure. It's the thousands of truck drivers who will be left unemployed. This is a disaster looming that will take our unempiyment from the 24% that it really is to 40%.

The job losses go hand in hand with the massive die offs.

I am afraid they will tell us, " oh, I see you are going to the grocery store. You wouldn't mind helping out John Smith who also needs to go to the store but doesn't have a car would you? We will be scheduling to stop at his place as he is on the way."

What kind of flat tires will they use?

Apart from the non-European religion, the Amish have it about right. When the oil runs out they may be our best hope and guide. Deepest respect.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Agreed. If 5g was so bad, why are you people always posting on the computer? Shouldn't you be living in the Amazonian rain forest?

Yes computers will make menial jobs obsolete. But they will also make life so easy that we will need very little money. Remember how much your first computer was in the 90s? A basic one was $2500, buy that in terms of gold and you're talking 20k. How much were airline tickets in the 80s? I flew to Chicago last weekend for $60rt.

Hey are you Saul's brother on Better Call Saul? You know, that crazy fat evil bastard that's allergic to electricity, but is really a psychotic fuck brain piece of shit.

Or drives you off a cliff.

Death to the DMV.

I was wondering how many of us will use a horse and cart...

I mean it, too.

what about all the accidents this will cause?

This is the reason I have all of the computers here hardwired to the router. We do not use WiFi.

Everyone in our home rests and sleeps better with the WiFi off.

My next target for removal is the "Smart" power meter the utility company installed without first asking permission.

The good news is there has been such a backlash here in this state, that I will be able to have this nefarious device removed. I will pay a monthly $10 fee. Presumably, this is the cost of sending a human being to read the meter monthly.

To me its well worth it.

You're the one who is stupid.

You're one of those people who never look into anything and never think of consequences.

Unfortunately, the world is at the mercy of idiots like you.