Fringe Researcher Materials

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC, Part One
by Sherman H. Skolnick 09/22/01

Starting after the multiple bombings of the Federal office building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995, I wrote and then spoke on talk radio about an aborted military coup. Brought home to me, however, was the reality that my fellow Americans had little knowledge or understanding of the masterstroke, the overthrow of government, whether for the good or for evil.

In the past, had we as Americans been clearly informed by the popular press of a putsch, the overthrow of government by violence, by political assassination, such as to benefit domestic or foreign powers? After all, who benefited from the political assassination of President Abraham Lincoln if not the British and the French who held the means to swoop upon us at the time from their entrenched positions to the south and north of us, in Canada and Mexico. The British wanted to split apart the nation by aggravating the natural friction between the ideas of the North and the South in America. The French were ready to carve up America as well. Since at least the War of 1812, the British had plotted to take back this continent as a puppet colony with so-called "Americans" again as subjects of the British Crown. [To their credit, Czarist Russia at the time of the War Between The States, or as called, the American Civil War, attempted to aid Lincoln with the Czar's naval fleet coming right offshore the U.S.].....
[link to www.apfn.org]

A Short History of Reported CIA Fronts
By Sherman H. Skolnick

I used to teach a course on how to investigate and research Foundation Tax Returns, originally called IRS form 990-A, and then form 990-AR, the only tax return, by the way, that is available as a public document. Donors Forum, with office/libraries in many big cities, have on hand for copying, copies of Foundation Tax Returns in that district of the office, sometimes other districts, of their public tax returns as a tax-exempt entity. In a scandal that was started by Bobby Kennedy in the Spring, of 1967, various foundations around the U.S. were identified as part of a complicated three-level device for disguising CIA funding of domestic operations: [1] conduits [2] pass-throughs and [3] fronts [a technical term]. A summary of the scandal can be seen in the numerous pages of the New York Times "Index" for 1967, a summary of stories in that newspaper, under the heading, Central Intelligence Agency. Before they could accomplish a cover up, I and my associates quickly looked up the 990-A tax returns of the CIA foundations on the three technical levels mentioned. We developed expertise in showing over and above the mass media published reports, where the money came from and was distributed. Among our disclosures, which did not endear us to fellow peaceniks who heckled me as a trouble-maker: 1. Most liberal groups with an office and some funds for a regular staff, got their funding through the three levels, from CIA, including the American Civil Liberties Union, which went out of business in 1967 and was completely taken over by espionage groups, since then called the Roger Baldwin Foundation of ACLU, and such. If you carefully examine the board of overseers of what amateurs continue wrongly call the "American Civil Liberties Union", you will see the espionage types that run the operations throughout the U.S. They are an early-warning system, for example, of flare-ups against the government in the ghettos of big cities......
[link to www.apfn.org]

Federal Reserve Orders:
Be Careful On Clinton!

The world's largest bank, the Federal Reserve, has ordered the US Congress to be careful in dealing with President Clinton. An order from this financial dictator cannot be ignored, although dissidents in the US military vow at some point to go public with their views against their Commander-in Chief Clinton......
[link to www.rense.com]

Pin this please!

I like the statement in his link

QUOTE
We offer these writers in the
spirit of Free Speech and Free communication of
differing points of view.
UNQUOTE

He has a great tollerance of topic materials without dumbing his show down and approaches his discussions with true intellectual logic. He doesnt sound like a kook off his rocker and thats probably his number one threat against the tragedy that is mainstream media, that they cant say hes stupid and crazy, yet they win without much content. At least they get the weather right much of the time.

He supports freedom and thats good enough for me. I dont need a miracle man to impress me, just some concrete intelligible discussion with brainy guests that arent telling hansel and grendle stories and worrying about apparitions.

He hasnt uploaded youube videos in a month now and I miss his (weekly?) shows, so I need to get with his program or else miss some more.

Why mentioning him isnt welcome here is a wonder to me.