Deep stuf (Physics): Is reality independent of what we can observe, or is what we observe? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've always found the tree falls in the wood and you don't hear it thing a canard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 What happens if a tree falls in the wood, you are under it, don't hear it, but yet it falls on your head, do you exist? Well, it depends if you existed before the tree felt into your head, isn't it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've always found the tree falls in the wood and you don't hear it thing a canard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 What happens if a tree falls in the wood, you are under it, don't hear it, but yet it falls on your head, do you exist? I mean technically it is the same scenario, right? Nobody is there to witness the tree fall. I could be wrong. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've always found the tree falls in the wood and you don't hear it thing a canard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 What happens if a tree falls in the wood, you are under it, don't hear it, but yet it falls on your head, do you exist? Well, it depends if you existed before the tree felt into your head, isn't it? But wouldn't somebody have some foreknowledge of the existence of said person? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71644467 United States 10/18/2017 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? |
Beneneth
User ID: 75698723 United Kingdom 10/18/2017 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've always found the tree falls in the wood and you don't hear it thing a canard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 What happens if a tree falls in the wood, you are under it, don't hear it, but yet it falls on your head, do you exist? Well, it depends if you existed before the tree felt into your head, isn't it? But wouldn't somebody have some foreknowledge of the existence of said person? Yes, someone could knew that we were out there. But this interpretation pretends to include only you and a given "reality". Modifying the experience: You are watching the wood from the road, and a tree fell. Then you keep going without knowing it, and never return there. Did the tree fell? It's only you, and your relative reality, or the absolute reality (that the tree fell). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've always found the tree falls in the wood and you don't hear it thing a canard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 What happens if a tree falls in the wood, you are under it, don't hear it, but yet it falls on your head, do you exist? Well, it depends if you existed before the tree felt into your head, isn't it? But wouldn't somebody have some foreknowledge of the existence of said person? Yes, someone could knew that we were out there. But this interpretation pretends to include only you and a given "reality". Modifying the experience: You are watching the wood from the road, and a tree fell. Then you keep going without knowing it, and never return there. Did the tree fell? It's only you, and your relative reality, or the absolute reality (that the tree fell). Why would you pretend a scenario that can't exist? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, I'm not so aware to give you a proper answer. I wrote the question, but I don't know if the question was already there (in my head) or it become true because I wrote it and then read what I posted. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75718901 Australia 10/18/2017 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
rockstar101
User ID: 74222431 United States 10/18/2017 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is subjective and so either way is correct. When the one great scorer comes to write against your name, he writes not that you won or lost but how you played the game. The stance and stare of a wolf you find yourself alone with will tell you that he is prepared to treat you as you would treat him. Whether that comforts or frightens you, he has told you all you need know about both. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71644467 United States 10/18/2017 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? Naturally. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Actually, such scenario exist IF I go back to the place, walk into the wood and find the tree. Then I realize what happened. Before of that, I wasn't aware so, for me, it didn't happen. That's just the same way of saying nothing happened before you were born. Doesn't make sense. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? Naturally. But such person is not perceiving reality. This man is observing "residuals" of something that happened long time ago. He even can't tell when did it happen. Even when is not my favourite physicist, Einstein said by the time quantum physics was emerging and the "Schrodinger Cat" paradox was being discussed: If you watch the Moon and turn your back, is it still there? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75065509 United States 10/18/2017 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? Naturally. But such person is not perceiving reality. This man is observing "residuals" of something that happened long time ago. He even can't tell when did it happen. Even when is not my favourite physicist, Einstein said by the time quantum physics was emerging and the "Schrodinger Cat" paradox was being discussed: If you watch the Moon and turn your back, is it still there? Wouldn't you have to have some sort of material construct to turn your back? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75718901 Australia 10/18/2017 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its all subjective realities Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75718901 You try to pretend otherwise That is obvious Do you look both ways when you cross the road? I got runaway once By someone reversing on a one way street So I look in every direction possible now Before crossing Are you implying This didnt happen Unil now that you are aware of it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71644467 United States 10/18/2017 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? Naturally. But such person is not perceiving reality. This man is observing "residuals" of something that happened long time ago. He even can't tell when did it happen. Even when is not my favourite physicist, Einstein said by the time quantum physics was emerging and the "Schrodinger Cat" paradox was being discussed: If you watch the Moon and turn your back, is it still there? But it is his reality at that point and he can perceive it anyway he chooses. |
The Rickest Rick Sanchez
User ID: 73168454 United States 10/18/2017 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The universe is basically an animal. It grazes on the ordinary. It creates infinite idiots just to eat them. The Rickest Rick Sanchez comments are meant for entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to reflect the feelings and opinions, implied or expressed, of the author. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 11:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75065509 Okay, what if the tree made no sound and the man who had the tree fall on him made no sound, but 100 years later a random other person walked through the woods and found a tree on top of skeleton, would he not reasonably conclude that a tree fell on somebody and crushed them and that happened in the past even though nobody was around to witness it? Naturally. But such person is not perceiving reality. This man is observing "residuals" of something that happened long time ago. He even can't tell when did it happen. Even when is not my favourite physicist, Einstein said by the time quantum physics was emerging and the "Schrodinger Cat" paradox was being discussed: If you watch the Moon and turn your back, is it still there? But it is his reality at that point and he can perceive it anyway he chooses. Don't forget that the main issue here is Modern Physics, and the problems that cosmological and atomic theories are bringing to us, laymen, every year. - Did you observe a gravitational wave? And did they? - Did you ever observed a photon? Does it exists? - Did you ever observed a Black Hole out there, at the space? Do they exists? - Did you ever observed a muon or a quark, or even an atom? This is the crossroad at current science, at least for disidents (non-believers). |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 48312932 Argentina 10/18/2017 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excerpt from: Einstein admits his 1905 special relativity theory is nonsense Roger J Anderton "The dream of physicists, to be able to predict any future event in the universe based on its present state, meets its certain death. If we regard reality as that which can be observed by all, we have to find that there is no objective movement of an electron around the nucleus. This viewpoint would imply that reality is created by the observer; in other words: if we take Heisenberg literally, the moon is not there when nobody is looking at it. However, we must consider the possibility that there is a subatomic reality independent of observation and that the electron may have an actual trajectory which cannot be measured. The moon may be there after all. This conflict is the philosophical essence of the Uncertainty Principle.” |