Feminism and why the patriarchy will win. A feeble attempt at trolling.

Ultimately feminist need the patriarchy.

I want to point out that superior women should be superior. However, without superior men to flaunt their higher earnings, status and overall better life to their sister in the great sisterhood. A lot of women would have to make do with inferior males should men be inferior to women. That means for many women that the prime status comes from beautiful men who are their pets. However, for every Jeremy Meeks there are hundreds if not thousands of inferior men talking about how they’d be happy to pay for the bail of the female hot felon.

Thus, for most women the prospect of dating a beautiful male is out of their reach with only very wealthy women dating the beautiful males. Like the Top Shop Heiress dating Jeremy Meeks. So, what becomes of the average women? They all live enviable lives with all of them going to Machu Picchu and analyzing the gothic cathedrals of Germany, or travelling the world with their desires being their only limiting factor.

So, what happens to the average man? I guess they either live lives of pious poverty to atone for the mistreatment of women for millennia or die from poverty. But the days of women posting to Facebook about how their men provide them with enviable lives with which to bolster their self-esteem and boost their ego would be over with every woman leading exemplary lives. However, what is now exemplary would become routine and mundane.

This would lead every woman to try to snag the beautiful male with most bar the wealthy failing. So ultimately women need the patriarchy to provide them with superior wealthy males with which to create envy in their sisters through social media. Because without the male to provide the necessary ego boost, the female quickly learns that she herself would live a boring and uneventful life of mediocrity with no possible advancement through to an enviable status which would be a way to differentiate herself from other females as being superior to them.

If a woman settled for an inferior male then her sisters would mock her as being desperate, thus women need superior males with which to provide them with the needed stimuli for life and the desire of other women to validate their choice of mate through their envy.

People are glorified base animals and need to establish themselves in a hierarchy that sets them as being desirable. This causes people not only no end of misery, but also the prospect of joy at being socially validated by attractive members of the opposite or the same sex which ever they sexually prefer.

Thus, feminists need the patriarchy to subversively “fight” against to give their lives meaning through the advancement of women, but also to feed their fragile egos with self-assurance that their lives are lived with envy from other less accomplished women.

What does everyone else think?