Do women approach romance like they're playing roullette? | |
jkm1864
User ID: 74933864 United States 12/19/2017 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pussy Grabber Extraordinaire |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75741916 Denmark 12/19/2017 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. Last Edited by plus on 12/19/2017 09:42 PM |
Daozen
User ID: 76010779 Taiwan 12/19/2017 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I never read that book you linked, thanks. More women are becoming financially independent now, so we're moving towards open hypergamy. i.e. financially stable women going after the alphas they always wanted, without caring about the future. The only way to enjoy this period, for men, is to get into the top 20-30%. 100 pushups a day can do a lot. Daozen appears to be mentally impaired, but harmless. Attention! You are in a Private Universe. Simulation Terms of Service: h t t p s ://godlikemidnight . vercel . app The world is a feeling. "The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the world is made of words." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76001517 United States 12/19/2017 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Interesting analogy. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52154903 It's failure is that it does NOT consider the "Ladder Theory" in conjunction with it. Under "Ladder Theory" once a woman has her first "win" in the bank (boyfriend or even 1st marriage) she is continually (for some subconsciously - for others consciously) looking for an "UPGRADE". She may UPGRADE several different times before her upgradability potential bumps up against her declining SMV (sexual market value - which is determined to a large extent by age/fertility). Cougars are an interesting group in that usually they are independently financially secure - no need for a man to provide financial security for them any more - so they can let their barely contained carnal desires dictate their behavior and choices. Usually Cougars, because THEY are chasing after something they want badly - YOUTH - are the best looking women of their age group, ie: exercise all the time, keep young mentally wrt current trends in music /clothes /etc.. Men of their own age hold little appeal for Cougars, even though they could easily hook most men of their age precisely because they are the best looking women of their age group, because they are chasing after that Fountain Of Youth ie: the highly desirable YOUNGER good looking male. The way you described Cougars is basically the way men act their entire lives. Maybe Cougars are just men in women's bodies who are liberated relatively late in life. What ever cup cake. I like how You lump 100% of the men into a category that only 30% of the men actually fit in. If you did some research You would learn that 70% of the women out there chase 30% of the men and the other men have to settle for 30% of the women whom are looking for families. So in essence Your full of shit and what you accuse Men of actually fits the majority of women. This post means nothing without sources to support the claims. You're claiming that I'm wrong about how men act? I'm in disbelief. In my experience, almost all heterosexual men are the way I described. |
Red John
User ID: 63347355 Canada 12/19/2017 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | start at the table minimum bet and increase by the minimum increase allowed all the way up to the table max. eg. if min bet is $10.00 and min increase is $5.00 and table max is $300.00 first bet is: 10 15 20 25 ... 295 300 that's a lot of hands to play and the strategy of scale betting is based on the total cards played as the cards are played the chances of winning hands increases or decreases depends on which cards have already been played the object is to walk away from the table on the bet that pays you more than what you came to the table with problem with it all is that relationships being played like a game is absurd :pixie: General Failure Reading Drive A: Who is General Failure? There can be Only One Team Swirl Swirl Nation instead of red, post in the thread, then I can respond. [link to qz.com (secure)] |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The majority of women are programmed to chase after the Alpha "Cave Man" male whom is the strongest and will more than likely produce the strongest offspring. The only problem with this programming is We have moved from the cave based society to an advanced society where families matter. I personally think as an advanced society We should force these unevolved human beings to evolve by making then take responsibility for their own actions. No longer should a responsible male or female pay for the bastard child of a caveman. If the cave people actually had to pay their own bills then maybe they might discourage this idiotic behavior. Quoting: jkm1864 How is this post related to this thread? |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there is also black jack scale betting Quoting: Red John start at the table minimum bet and increase by the minimum increase allowed all the way up to the table max. eg. if min bet is $10.00 and min increase is $5.00 and table max is $300.00 first bet is: 10 15 20 25 ... 295 300 that's a lot of hands to play and the strategy of scale betting is based on the total cards played as the cards are played the chances of winning hands increases or decreases depends on which cards have already been played the object is to walk away from the table on the bet that pays you more than what you came to the table with problem with it all is that relationships being played like a game is absurd How would that be used in romance? I already posted this in this thread, but it bears repeating. We're falling into the pit of total stupidity. THE MOST STUPID MONEY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (Martingale Strategy) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Red John
User ID: 63925004 Canada 12/19/2017 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there is also black jack scale betting Quoting: Red John start at the table minimum bet and increase by the minimum increase allowed all the way up to the table max. eg. if min bet is $10.00 and min increase is $5.00 and table max is $300.00 first bet is: 10 15 20 25 ... 295 300 that's a lot of hands to play and the strategy of scale betting is based on the total cards played as the cards are played the chances of winning hands increases or decreases depends on which cards have already been played the object is to walk away from the table on the bet that pays you more than what you came to the table with problem with it all is that relationships being played like a game is absurd How would that be used in romance? I already posted this in this thread, but it bears repeating. We're falling into the pit of total stupidity. THE MOST STUPID MONEY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (Martingale Strategy) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] each hand dealt is the potential mate and each time you play you increase your bet in the hope of the payout hardly anyone I know has their first hand dealt as their spouse you don't meet that girl / boy in K or Grade 1 and stick with them through all the school years and into adulthood not anymore those days are over, that died with the gen before the boomers :pixie: General Failure Reading Drive A: Who is General Failure? There can be Only One Team Swirl Swirl Nation instead of red, post in the thread, then I can respond. [link to qz.com (secure)] |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there is also black jack scale betting Quoting: Red John start at the table minimum bet and increase by the minimum increase allowed all the way up to the table max. eg. if min bet is $10.00 and min increase is $5.00 and table max is $300.00 first bet is: 10 15 20 25 ... 295 300 that's a lot of hands to play and the strategy of scale betting is based on the total cards played as the cards are played the chances of winning hands increases or decreases depends on which cards have already been played the object is to walk away from the table on the bet that pays you more than what you came to the table with problem with it all is that relationships being played like a game is absurd How would that be used in romance? I already posted this in this thread, but it bears repeating. We're falling into the pit of total stupidity. THE MOST STUPID MONEY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (Martingale Strategy) [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] each hand dealt is the potential mate and each time you play you increase your bet in the hope of the payout hardly anyone I know has their first hand dealt as their spouse you don't meet that girl / boy in K or Grade 1 and stick with them through all the school years and into adulthood not anymore those days are over, that died with the gen before the boomers My position is that women approach romance by doing something like that. My belief is that it's a dumb approach for them because they have to consider the fact that they're racing against time, and their choices will affect their future children. Even if the they don't want to have children, they're in a race against time before they hit "the wall." At that point, their chances of finding love and partners they like greatly diminish. Last Edited by plus on 12/19/2017 10:45 PM |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/19/2017 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Women in the US were raised by Disney to believe in chivalry and Prince Charming. They were taught by barbie too that they could be anything, and life should be easy. Conservative up bringing taught women to settle for the guy that paid you the most attention when you were young. So many women married young. The economy got more competitive. Men could not support a family on their own. So, women had to go to work. Life was not that easy. Then the liberals said, our men were not good enough to us. They were not our Prince Charmings. That we deserved more and better. If we were unhappy it was because we where not lucky enough. So women got divorces. Then you had a whole pool of women , with no skills, and some with kids now. So women headed off to college to as they realized that their was a limited number of good men that were able to treat them like a princess. In order to do that you had to be around men. The best income earners were those with a college education. By the time women finished college though many of the best men were already married and now competing against them in the work force. Very few good men few and far between that could support a family to a women that wanted to live like a princess. When I was a kid I married the first guy that proposed to me and I didn't even know him very well. Turned out he was not honest before we wed . Later I found we had different goals in life. We were still great friend , but I thought I could upgrade. So, I worked full time and finished college. I hedge my bets on what I thought would be better life in the long run. I was hitting 30. The best men were usually taken or married. College and working full time made me plump. Which of coarse made me shy and I further didn't date much. So when the time came, I met an alcoholic someone. He was Ok with a chunky lady. By the time I realized that he was not the one for me, I was knocked up. I was in my mid 30's and time was running out. So I married him. I took off the weight, and went on to have another baby with him too. I kept a trim shape and men came out of the wood work. However now they were all divorced with kids and child support payments to make to unhappy ex wives. So, having learned my lesson I decided to stay put, and deal with the hand I was dealt. After all I have kids now and they come first. What ever goes on in my relation ship with my current spouse is livable even though not ideal. The kids have two parent, the thins they need and lots of activities they can participate in. Daddy and I can fake for now. More importantly is what I can teach my daughter that was never taught to me. A women's wealth is in her youth and beauty. She needs to work on herself. She needs to get an education to support herself, and become charming, well mannered and delightful to be around, to up her value early on. She needs realistic but high standards. She needs to be able to recognize what she wants in life. A women should of a list of ideals for you man pro's and con's, on each one she dates. She should not lead men on and pay her own way during dating as to not give any guy the wrong impression. They are just friends till he has met the majority of her targets. Then if she is worth it to him hopefully she can rope him in. |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good analogy. It was my story and I am a women. Quoting: Hope Rising Women in the US were raised by Disney to believe in chivalry and Prince Charming. They were taught by barbie too that they could be anything, and life should be easy. Conservative up bringing taught women to settle for the guy that paid you the most attention when you were young. So many women married young. The economy got more competitive. Men could not support a family on their own. So, women had to go to work. Life was not that easy. Then the liberals said, our men were not good enough to us. They were not our Prince Charmings. That we deserved more and better. If we were unhappy it was because we where not lucky enough. So women got divorces. Then you had a whole pool of women , with no skills, and some with kids now. So women headed off to college to as they realized that their was a limited number of good men that were able to treat them like a princess. In order to do that you had to be around men. The best income earners were those with a college education. By the time women finished college though many of the best men were already married and now competing against them in the work force. Very few good men few and far between that could support a family to a women that wanted to live like a princess. When I was a kid I married the first guy that proposed to me and I didn't even know him very well. Turned out he was not honest before we wed . Later I found we had different goals in life. We were still great friend , but I thought I could upgrade. So, I worked full time and finished college. I hedge my bets on what I thought would be better life in the long run. I was hitting 30. The best men were usually taken or married. College and working full time made me plump. Which of coarse made me shy and I further didn't date much. So when the time came, I met an alcoholic someone. He was Ok with a chunky lady. By the time I realized that he was not the one for me, I was knocked up. I was in my mid 30's and time was running out. So I married him. I took off the weight, and went on to have another baby with him too. I kept a trim shape and men came out of the wood work. However now they were all divorced with kids and child support payments to make to unhappy ex wives. So, having learned my lesson I decided to stay put, and deal with the hand I was dealt. After all I have kids now and they come first. What ever goes on in my relation ship with my current spouse is livable even though not ideal. The kids have two parent, the thins they need and lots of activities they can participate in. Daddy and I can fake for now. More importantly is what I can teach my daughter that was never taught to me. A women's wealth is in her youth and beauty. She needs to work on herself. She needs to get an education to support herself, and become charming, well mannered and delightful to be around, to up her value early on. She needs realistic but high standards. She needs to be able to recognize what she wants in life. A women should of a list of ideals for you man pro's and con's, on each one she dates. She should not lead men on and pay her own way during dating as to not give any guy the wrong impression. They are just friends till he has met the majority of her targets. Then if she is worth it to him hopefully she can rope him in. You can't blame what I described in the original post on Western culture. I have extensive experience with women from Western and Asian cultures, and they almost all act the way I described in the original post. I think the only large culture that could be excluded from women acting that way is Arab women in the Middle East. I believe Arab women outside of the Middle East act that way as do women from almost all of Africa. It's just hardwired into women for some reason. |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/19/2017 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73117110 United States 12/19/2017 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They seperate u soon u will end up disliking tge person only because they need one another to be healthy. Instead its seperate get them to dislike eavhother and point them towards single playas who can play them . Taking matches and making everyone a slut |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I agree it is hard wired into us and reinforced as young girls. I think we finally have a shot at reversing the tend though. Quoting: Hope Rising Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/19/2017 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So in today's climate, it is almost toxic for men to get married and have children. Especially with women that can't take care of themselves just as well. Even then there is a lot of stress on the family to care for children appropriately with two working parents. Screwed up kids are going to cost you money too. I think we are heading in a healthy direction though. It is good to see young people taking their time and making sure the one is the one and than if they have kids keeping their numbers small. |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/19/2017 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I agree it is hard wired into us and reinforced as young girls. I think we finally have a shot at reversing the tend though. Quoting: Hope Rising Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. The shy guy is going to lose out with the younger women. If he is patient though and focuses on his business, when he has money later in life he will score big, and him being available will go out like a beacon by word of mouth by his friends wives. He will need to overcome his shyness still to some extend. But, if you have money women are more happy to break the ice. It is in our DNA ... we want to nest and feel secure. No man should marry a women though less than 10 years his Junior though. Too much a an age cultural difference. |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think we are heading in a healthy direction though. It is good to see young people taking their time and making sure the one is the one and than if they have kids keeping their numbers small. Quoting: Hope Rising How did you come to that conclusion? Mellenials are the most detached generation by far. The evidence for that is obvious and overwhelming. When I was young, classrooms would be buzzing with conversations before classes started. Now they're quite with almost everyone looking at their phones. Mellenials are absurdly out of touch with reality, and it's getting worse all the time. |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/19/2017 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I agree it is hard wired into us and reinforced as young girls. I think we finally have a shot at reversing the tend though. Quoting: Hope Rising Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. The shy guy is going to lose out with the younger women. If he is patient though and focuses on his business, when he has money later in life he will score big, and him being available will go out like a beacon by word of mouth by his friends wives. He will need to overcome his shyness still to some extend. But, if you have money women are more happy to break the ice. It is in our DNA ... we want to nest and feel secure. No man should marry a women though less than 10 years his Junior though. Too much a an age cultural difference. Please start watching this video 1 minute, 30 seconds into it. Your post above is debunked. Women tend to overlook all negative characteristics if a man is good-looking enough. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/19/2017 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Men are highly visual. Women I am sure in cave area, if they were hunting with men, probably got injured and scared up. Thus they were less healthy to have children with , since they could die of infections or be killed in the hunt. Therefore women learned to hang back from the hunt. Women leaned to be flirty first for her own survival and passive aggressive to ensure the off spring had the best chance of succeeding. The more she accumulated, by supporting the alpha male, meant she than had power in the tribe. She got to have over influence to other women and young men. This meant she didn't have to work as hard risking her own health. This means she could live longer, as she didn't have to work as hard. So being young an good looking was very important to female survival. |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/20/2017 12:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Men are highly visual. Women I am sure in cave area, if they were hunting with men, probably got injured and scared up. Thus they were less healthy to have children with , since they could die of infections or be killed in the hunt. Quoting: Hope Rising Therefore women learned to hang back from the hunt. Women leaned to be flirty first for her own survival and passive aggressive to ensure the off spring had the best chance of succeeding. The more she accumulated, by supporting the alpha male, meant she than had power in the tribe. She got to have over influence to other women and young men. This meant she didn't have to work as hard risking her own health. This means she could live longer, as she didn't have to work as hard. So being young an good looking was very important to female survival. Did you watch any of the video that I recommended to you? |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/20/2017 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, I agree it is hard wired into us and reinforced as young girls. I think we finally have a shot at reversing the tend though. Quoting: Hope Rising Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. The shy guy is going to lose out with the younger women. If he is patient though and focuses on his business, when he has money later in life he will score big, and him being available will go out like a beacon by word of mouth by his friends wives. He will need to overcome his shyness still to some extend. But, if you have money women are more happy to break the ice. It is in our DNA ... we want to nest and feel secure. No man should marry a women though less than 10 years his Junior though. Too much a an age cultural difference. Please start watching this video 1 minute, 30 seconds into it. Your post above is debunked. Women tend to overlook all negative characteristics if a man is good-looking enough. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] I think you misunderstood. Looks is the first thing that gets a guy noticed. Just like with women. Women can afford to be shy. However a women will quickly lose interest in a guy that is not receptive to her coming on to him. His IQ may be too low. Case in point. My son has autisms. He is very hansom and I am not just saying that because I am mama. My son looks better and similar to Justin Beiber. He gets girls flooding around him all the time especially at the pool. Kid has a nice body as he is out on the trampoline all the time. However, he is not on the same page with these girls when all he want to do is talk about Star Wars or the the movie Cars. He had asked a few normative girls out, but they answer is always no they have something to do. So you have to be somewhat bright or clever to maintain a women's interest. Furthermore you have to have income potential. That wins out over everything. Shy guys are ok. Confidence of-course always wins if it is cool. There are some dorks with confidence that still no women would date unless he had money. Most men like confident women as well, but are ok settling for the shy girls that act cute. So same with women. A shy man is OK, especially if she s a strong personality and he has money. A poor shy guy though is going to have a very hard time finding love. Alpha are almost always preferred. However, age changes women and they will settle for the shy guy too. Remember they have their biological time clock ticking. Shy men are usually perceived to be nice men. They will be considered stronger though if they are financially fit. Financially fit men are usually perceived as being more assertive and confident. So you see it is all about perception and resources. Young handsome and fit is number one, next is confidence, bacuase if you are confident you may be bright enough to gather resources. Finally, if you have wealth and resources, you can be ugly and shy because your wealth makes you appear assertive and successful. Also yes, a women will love you no matter what, once she gets to know you well, especially if the sex is incredible. You need to make her feel like a princess always, safe, secure, and beautiful. That is very important. So you get with a lady, lose reality of what she really is. |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75467325 Denmark 12/20/2017 12:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: plus Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. The shy guy is going to lose out with the younger women. If he is patient though and focuses on his business, when he has money later in life he will score big, and him being available will go out like a beacon by word of mouth by his friends wives. He will need to overcome his shyness still to some extend. But, if you have money women are more happy to break the ice. It is in our DNA ... we want to nest and feel secure. No man should marry a women though less than 10 years his Junior though. Too much a an age cultural difference. Please start watching this video 1 minute, 30 seconds into it. Your post above is debunked. Women tend to overlook all negative characteristics if a man is good-looking enough. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] I think you misunderstood. Looks is the first thing that gets a guy noticed. Just like with women. Women can afford to be shy. However a women will quickly lose interest in a guy that is not receptive to her coming on to him. His IQ may be too low. Case in point. My son has autisms. He is very hansom and I am not just saying that because I am mama. My son looks better and similar to Justin Beiber. He gets girls flooding around him all the time especially at the pool. Kid has a nice body as he is out on the trampoline all the time. However, he is not on the same page with these girls when all he want to do is talk about Star Wars or the the movie Cars. He had asked a few normative girls out, but they answer is always no they have something to do. So you have to be somewhat bright or clever to maintain a women's interest. Furthermore you have to have income potential. That wins out over everything. Shy guys are ok. Confidence of-course always wins if it is cool. There are some dorks with confidence that still no women would date unless he had money. Most men like confident women as well, but are ok settling for the shy girls that act cute. So same with women. A shy man is OK, especially if she s a strong personality and he has money. A poor shy guy though is going to have a very hard time finding love. Alpha are almost always preferred. However, age changes women and they will settle for the shy guy too. Remember they have their biological time clock ticking. Shy men are usually perceived to be nice men. They will be considered stronger though if they are financially fit. Financially fit men are usually perceived as being more assertive and confident. So you see it is all about perception and resources. Young handsome and fit is number one, next is confidence, bacuase if you are confident you may be bright enough to gather resources. Finally, if you have wealth and resources, you can be ugly and shy because your wealth makes you appear assertive and successful. Also yes, a women will love you no matter what, once she gets to know you well, especially if the sex is incredible. You need to make her feel like a princess always, safe, secure, and beautiful. That is very important. So you get with a lady, lose reality of what she really is. That video is evidence against a lot of what you just claimed. Do you realize how much you've contradicted yourself in this thread? I think we have to agree to agree and disagree. I agree with some of your claims, and I disagree with some of your claims. Interestingly enough, you're in the same boat here. You obviously have issues with many of the claims you're making. |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/20/2017 01:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | See this is what is good about the gold digging girl. She can look past the beast to find the diamond in the rough. She smart enough to know beauty fades, but diamonds are forever. She plays her cards right she can be the princess she so desires to be. She just has to remember that money isn't everything. You still have to love this man at the end of the day. Example; Micheal Jackson (after too many surgeries) , Stephen Tyler, Mic Jagger, George Soros, Harvey Weinstein... all ugly! A man with wealth can buy love and yes, it is love. |
Hope Rising
User ID: 69947748 United States 12/20/2017 01:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am not OP. I have been consistent. Looks gets a man notices, but that is not going to keep a women around. good looking people do get treated differently. Pretty people appear more fit and healthy. Confidence is important, however a shy guy can do well too, especially if you is wealthy. An ugly, shy guy that is poor is not in a good position, but their is someone for everyone. A wealthy man reigns supreme over looks and confidence. Any women that denies that is not being honest or is not very bright to begin with. The women in the video appeared to be uneducated English, working class type of people that have been brought up to admire the things of tabloid press. Furthermore in their culture you are not suppose to say out loud that money is an attractive feature of a man, as wealth should not have anything to do with attractiveness... morally. Isn't the internet fun... we can be honest. American women will be more blunt about the fact that their partners income matters. They do not like to date or be married to a man that makes a lot less than they do unless they are both in the same profession. Resources matter when you are trying to nest and the women wants to be a well involved parent and good spouse. Nothing wrong with it ... it is nature. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69949744 United Kingdom 12/20/2017 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Red John
User ID: 68655676 Canada 12/20/2017 08:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: plus Do you have on thoughts on the following post that I made earlier in this thread? I see a deeper logic to all of this. If women assume that men are only interested in looks (reasonable assumption), then a little nudge is enough to figure out what's going on his head. If the man thinks the woman is hot, he'll jump at almost any chance to speak with her. That's true. The little nudges act simultaneously as shit tests. If the man is interested in the woman but too cowardly to make the most of the opportunity she gives him, then he's failed the shit test, and he's not "worthy." That is actually completely logical and sensible, but it doesn't work for young women because they're in a race against time. I stand by what I wrote in the original post. The shy guy is going to lose out with the younger women. If he is patient though and focuses on his business, when he has money later in life he will score big, and him being available will go out like a beacon by word of mouth by his friends wives. He will need to overcome his shyness still to some extend. But, if you have money women are more happy to break the ice. It is in our DNA ... we want to nest and feel secure. No man should marry a women though less than 10 years his Junior though. Too much a an age cultural difference. Please start watching this video 1 minute, 30 seconds into it. Your post above is debunked. Women tend to overlook all negative characteristics if a man is good-looking enough. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] I think you misunderstood. Looks is the first thing that gets a guy noticed. Just like with women. Women can afford to be shy. However a women will quickly lose interest in a guy that is not receptive to her coming on to him. His IQ may be too low. Case in point. My son has autisms. He is very hansom and I am not just saying that because I am mama. My son looks better and similar to Justin Beiber. He gets girls flooding around him all the time especially at the pool. Kid has a nice body as he is out on the trampoline all the time. However, he is not on the same page with these girls when all he want to do is talk about Star Wars or the the movie Cars. He had asked a few normative girls out, but they answer is always no they have something to do. So you have to be somewhat bright or clever to maintain a women's interest. Furthermore you have to have income potential. That wins out over everything. Shy guys are ok. Confidence of-course always wins if it is cool. There are some dorks with confidence that still no women would date unless he had money. Most men like confident women as well, but are ok settling for the shy girls that act cute. So same with women. A shy man is OK, especially if she s a strong personality and he has money. A poor shy guy though is going to have a very hard time finding love. Alpha are almost always preferred. However, age changes women and they will settle for the shy guy too. Remember they have their biological time clock ticking. Shy men are usually perceived to be nice men. They will be considered stronger though if they are financially fit. Financially fit men are usually perceived as being more assertive and confident. So you see it is all about perception and resources. Young handsome and fit is number one, next is confidence, bacuase if you are confident you may be bright enough to gather resources. Finally, if you have wealth and resources, you can be ugly and shy because your wealth makes you appear assertive and successful. Also yes, a women will love you no matter what, once she gets to know you well, especially if the sex is incredible. You need to make her feel like a princess always, safe, secure, and beautiful. That is very important. So you get with a lady, lose reality of what she really is. IQ does not equal RQ (Relational Quotient) Today most people have RQs lower than a box of rocks it's amazing that anyone manages to get in a relationship that has any longevity though some idiots in the low IQ dept. manage to find their life long partner and some above average IQ manage to only ever find hurt and pain the difference is RQ _ _ High function ASD does not Equal low IQ in fact many are genius level in certain skills many do however suffer lower RQ I am High function ASD my RQ is low, but not because of the ASD alone, though it does have some impact but because of the lack of modeling in my (non existent) parents, I never learned any of it thus women who drop the subtle hints and cues at me get completely unnoticed because I never had a Father & Mother to correctly model these things (lost my mom at age 3) thus leaving me completely oblivious to that "interest" by the time I realize what is going on (if I do at all) it's too late at that point and also because of that I never learned appropriate "reciprocating " / pursuit behaviors from my Father because after mom was gone, the only women he had around were bar skanks not a good way to model appropriate relationship behaviors _ _ addressing the "no matter what" statement: no, a woman will not love a man no matter what... especially when predicating a relationship on the quality of sex that is recipe for a "fucking" disaster (pun intended) - this can be seen in the high cheat and divorce rates :pixie: General Failure Reading Drive A: Who is General Failure? There can be Only One Team Swirl Swirl Nation instead of red, post in the thread, then I can respond. [link to qz.com (secure)] |
plus
(OP) User ID: 72444303 Denmark 12/21/2017 12:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Roullette is probably the best analogy for what women do in romance. They have a stack of chips (the chips symbolize the time they're fertile) when they reach dating age. They make small individual bets on specific numbers, and they just keep doing that until they're almost out of chips (time). The way they make those small bets is to nudge the men they like toward asking them out and going beyond that. Quoting: plus If they've reached about 30 years old, and they've lost all their bets, they just go all-in on red or black (i.e. settling for the best that's available in that moment). Their biological clock is ticking after all. They become a lot more assertive, aggressive, and accepting in a race against time to get married before having children becomes a lot more difficult. I'm sorry, but that's an incredibly stupid strategy. Going all-in a lot sooner would lead to a much higher level of happiness throughout their lives on average. The way women approach romance is exactly the same way a dumb degenerate gambler approaches gambling. They use a reckless, ill-conceived strategy, and if they win, it's just because they were lucky. I know there are lots of exceptions to that, but the exceptions prove the rule. All of this can be explained by the following... Thread: The truth about women...from women If the behavior described in the original post of this thread is a result of women being unconfident, it's perfectly understandable. Last Edited by plus on 12/21/2017 12:30 AM |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75873635 Denmark 12/21/2017 03:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tom Leykis says that being "interested but aloof" is the best way to approach women. That fits my theory that women approach romance like they're playing roullette. Women are interested but aloof in the beginning stages of romance. It makes perfect sense that they would respect that approach most. People generally respect and like people who are like them. I'm getting very close to having my biggest questions about women answered. Thanks GLP. Treating Women Like Crap Turns Them On [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
plus
(OP) User ID: 75873635 Denmark 12/21/2017 04:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Tom Leykis says that being "interested but aloof" is the best way to approach women. That fits my theory that women approach romance like they're playing roullette. Quoting: plus Women are interested but aloof in the beginning stages of romance. It makes perfect sense that they would respect that approach most. People generally respect and like people who are like them. I'm getting very close to having my biggest questions about women answered. Thanks GLP. Treating Women Like Crap Turns Them On [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Leykis made a great point in this video. He said that all women think that their vagina is unique, but they're all wrong. Vaginas are basically fungible, and that proves that women are delusional. |