Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 74630238 United States 01/03/2018 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Here is the first link to show they completely removed the first 11 verses in John 8 that accounts of Jesus having mercy on the adulterous woman that was about to be stoned to death and Jesus told them he with out sin cast the first stone. [link to www.jw.org (secure)] See all the other verses they deleted here [link to avoidjw.org] |
Daniel7
User ID: 58366438 United States 01/05/2018 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? These manuscripts do not include John 7:53 - 8:11, ’Aleph) Codex Sinaiticus, Gr., fourth cent. C.E., British Museum, H.S., G.S., B: Vatican ms 1209, Gr., fourth cent. C.E., Vatican City, Rome, H.S., G.S., Sys: Sinaitic Syriac codex, fourth and fifth cent. C.E., Gospels. In fact, it is Christendom that is guilty of falsifying scripture such as, the deletion of the Divine name 7,000 times and 1 John 5:7, 8 to name a few. Last Edited by Daniel7 on 01/05/2018 12:29 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76081147 United States 01/05/2018 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? These manuscripts do not include John 7:53 - 8:11, Quoting: Daniel7 ’Aleph) Codex Sinaiticus, Gr., fourth cent. C.E., British Museum, H.S., G.S., B: Vatican ms 1209, Gr., fourth cent. C.E., Vatican City, Rome, H.S., G.S., Sys: Sinaitic Syriac codex, fourth and fifth cent. C.E., Gospels. In fact, it is Christendom that is guilty of falsifying scripture such as, the deletion of the Divine name 7,000 times and 1 John 5:7, 8 to name a few. Jehovah Witnesses and countless others claim that the references to God the Father in the New Testament has been changed from "Jehovah" to either "Lord" or "God," so as to deceive the masses regarding this proper name for God. What utter nonsense. Back in the days of the apostles, thousands of copies of their gospels and epistles were sent throughout the Mid-East. And today we still have six to seven thousand copies of those copies. And those letters were duplicated and sent out immediately after they were written. They were distributed to church after church and congregation after congregation and family after family. How many copies were sent through the Roman world only God only knows. Follow this: Thousands of copies of the Apostle's letters were send to thousands of people, families, and church congregations during those early years. And many of those copies of copies have come down to us today. How then, is it even in the realm of possibility that someone or an entire army of people could go out and locate all of those thousands of Greek epistles; then confiscate them; then fraudulently erase 200 references to Jehovah and insert either "God" or "Lord" in their place; and then return them again to their rightful owners? Are they serious? Apparently. But no, it never happened. The Holy Spirit of God did not inspire all of the New Testament writers to use the Hebrew name YHWH transliterated to "Jehovah," hundreds of times in their gospels and epistles. On the other hand, let's ask ourselves a serious question: If Jesus said He came to exalt, honor, and manifest His Father's Name, wouldn't there have to be at least a few examples of Jesus Himself using His Father's Name Jehovah somewhere in the gospels? Surely the Jehovah's Witnesses must have such a copy where the Greek retained the supposed use of the name "Jehovah" in the New Testament. Don't they have such a Greek manuscript from which they made their New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures? Nope, they don't. Where the Greek said "Lord" (Greek: kurios, not YHWH), they changed it to "Jehovah." And where the Greek said "God" (Greek: theos, not YHWH), they translated it to "Jehovah. But that is not translating. That is interpretation. God has not given man the authority to make such changes to His Word (Rev. 22:18-19). The Name "Jehovah" comes from the tetragrammaton which consists of the letters YHWH. These letters when transliterated into the English become "Jehovah." See further explanation below. WHERE ARE ALL THOSE MISSING MANUSCRIPTS? Some argue that the original gospels, for example, where not written in Greek, but in Hebrew, and certainly the Father's Name, YHWH, would HAVE to be in them. But there are no Hebrew gospels written by the apostles. No one has ever found even one. If multiple thousands of Greek manuscripts escaped this theory of the Jehovah Witnesses, where are they? Where are even a few such Greek manuscripts containing the Name Jehovah? Is there a Greek manuscript of the New Testament anywhere on earth that contains the tetragrammaton-YHWH, Jehovah? No there isn't, because there never were any in the first place. |
Daniel7
User ID: 58366438 United States 01/06/2018 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Yes. No doubt The Divine Name was used in the first century Bible, but as the apostasy set in that the Bible warned of, which is now Christendom [link to www.scribd.com (secure)] The-Apostasy LORD was substituted for Jehovah. All you have to do is pick up any Bible to see this. Jesus did use The Divine Name when he was being tempted by The Devil at Matt. 4:10 where he is quoting from Deut. where Jehovah appears. [link to www.jw.org (secure)] Last Edited by Daniel7 on 01/06/2018 05:11 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4550420 United States 01/06/2018 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Here is the first link to show they completely removed the first 11 verses in John 8 that accounts of Jesus having mercy on the adulterous woman that was about to be stoned to death and Jesus told them he with out sin cast the first stone. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74630238 [link to www.jw.org (secure)] See all the other verses they deleted here [link to avoidjw.org] I would assume the reference to "Adultery" was the primary issue? Adulterate, Adulteration, Adulterated...are synonymouse with Mongrelism, and Mongrel-Theism, which is referenced as Satanic or Anti-Christ. Deviants have made enormous efforts to have references to Mongrel-Theism removed from the scriptures. I don't know the Greek, or Latin word used in this example, but I would speculate this is exactly the reference being made. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4550420 United States 01/06/2018 06:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Here is the first link to show they completely removed the first 11 verses in John 8 that accounts of Jesus having mercy on the adulterous woman that was about to be stoned to death and Jesus told them he with out sin cast the first stone. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74630238 [link to www.jw.org (secure)] See all the other verses they deleted here [link to avoidjw.org] I would assume the reference to "Adultery" was the primary issue? Adulterate, Adulteration, Adulterated...are synonymouse with Mongrelism, and Mongrel-Theism, which is referenced as Satanic or Anti-Christ. Deviants have made enormous efforts to have references to Mongrel-Theism removed from the scriptures. I don't know the Greek, or Latin word used in this example, but I would speculate this is exactly the reference being made. I would point-out the J.W. calls their Bible the "New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures". Since the NWO or New World Order seems to predominantly support Mongrel-Theism, Mongrelism, and Rapefugee Pogroms oriented to Mongrel-Theism. These strange coincidences are par-for-the-course in terms of Anti-Christ Theology. I would point out the Roman Catholic Pope is spewing a similar or same Anti-Christ Ideology of Mongrel-Theism. Unfortunately, you wont find many real Christians in an organized church. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72908432 United States 01/06/2018 06:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Yes. No doubt The Divine Name was used in the first century Bible, but as the apostasy set in that the Bible warned of, which is now Christendom Quoting: Daniel7 [link to www.scribd.com (secure)] The-Apostasy LORD was substituted for Jehovah. All you have to do is pick up any Bible to see this. Jesus did use The Divine Name when he was being tempted by The Devil at Matt. 4:10 where he is quoting from Deut. where Jehovah appears. [link to www.jw.org (secure)] The name was never used in the Greek scriptures. Only in Hebrew old testament writings. The Watchtower took it upon themselves to insert the name in the New Testament. That's a fact. Jehovah Witnesses and countless others claim that the references to God the Father in the New Testament has been changed from "Jehovah" to either "Lord" or "God," so as to deceive the masses regarding this proper name for God. What utter nonsense. Back in the days of the apostles, thousands of copies of their gospels and epistles were sent throughout the Mid-East. And today we still have six to seven thousand copies of those copies. And those letters were duplicated and sent out immediately after they were written. They were distributed to church after church and congregation after congregation and family after family. How many copies were sent through the Roman world only God only knows. Follow this: Thousands of copies of the Apostle's letters were send to thousands of people, families, and church congregations during those early years. And many of those copies of copies have come down to us today. How then, is it even in the realm of possibility that someone or an entire army of people could go out and locate all of those thousands of Greek epistles; then confiscate them; then fraudulently erase 200 references to Jehovah and insert either "God" or "Lord" in their place; and then return them again to their rightful owners? Are they serious? Apparently. But no, it never happened. The Holy Spirit of God did not inspire all of the New Testament writers to use the Hebrew name YHWH transliterated to "Jehovah," hundreds of times in their gospels and epistles. On the other hand, let's ask ourselves a serious question: If Jesus said He came to exalt, honor, and manifest His Father's Name, wouldn't there have to be at least a few examples of Jesus Himself using His Father's Name Jehovah somewhere in the gospels? Surely the Jehovah's Witnesses must have such a copy where the Greek retained the supposed use of the name "Jehovah" in the New Testament. Don't they have such a Greek manuscript from which they made their New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures? Nope, they don't. Where the Greek said "Lord" (Greek: kurios, not YHWH), they changed it to "Jehovah." And where the Greek said "God" (Greek: theos, not YHWH), they translated it to "Jehovah. But that is not translating. That is interpretation. God has not given man the authority to make such changes to His Word (Rev. 22:18-19). The Name "Jehovah" comes from the tetragrammaton which consists of the letters YHWH. These letters when transliterated into the English become "Jehovah." See further explanation below. WHERE ARE ALL THOSE MISSING MANUSCRIPTS? Some argue that the original gospels, for example, where not written in Greek, but in Hebrew, and certainly the Father's Name, YHWH, would HAVE to be in them. But there are no Hebrew gospels written by the apostles. No one has ever found even one. If multiple thousands of Greek manuscripts escaped this theory of the Jehovah Witnesses, where are they? Where are even a few such Greek manuscripts containing the Name Jehovah? Is there a Greek manuscript of the New Testament anywhere on earth that contains the tetragrammaton-YHWH, Jehovah? No there isn't, because there never were any in the first place |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74806362 United States 01/06/2018 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Victor Vectors
User ID: 71388910 United States 01/06/2018 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? For those that do not know, Jesus Christ's words and deeds as eye witnessed are only 4 books out of 66 that make up the modern Bible. Those 4 books, only 120 pages in length, are titled Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. They are also called the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Truth or the Good News. The Good News is about how mankind's disconnection from God can be reestablished thru that one man Jesus Christ. We fell through Adam and we arise through the Christ. The Good News is how to live here now and how to get ready for life there later. Jesus Christ's philosophy was handed to him from his Father, our Father....God. It is a philosophy of grace...it is not a performance based philosophy....you can do nothing but accept it as a gift of grace. Become FREE for FREE==> [link to www.e-sword.net] Download an additional bible called the GNB or Good News Bible (it is in everyday easy English) for easy reading. Included are commentaries on each passage to help with difficult areas. The Lord desires to develop a personal relationship with each one of us as parent to child, brother to brother and brother to sister. |
Daniel7
User ID: 58366438 United States 01/12/2018 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is Jehovah's Witnesses Bible a Counterfeit That Deleted Over 30 Scriptures ? Or The King James Version that Kept them In The Bible ? Yes. No doubt The Divine Name was used in the first century Bible, but as the apostasy set in that the Bible warned of, which is now Christendom Quoting: Daniel7 [link to www.scribd.com (secure)] The-Apostasy LORD was substituted for Jehovah. All you have to do is pick up any Bible to see this. Jesus did use The Divine Name when he was being tempted by The Devil at Matt. 4:10 where he is quoting from Deut. where Jehovah appears. [link to www.jw.org (secure)] The name was never used in the Greek scriptures. Only in Hebrew old testament writings. The Watchtower took it upon themselves to insert the name in the New Testament. That's a fact. Jehovah Witnesses and countless others claim that the references to God the Father in the New Testament has been changed from "Jehovah" to either "Lord" or "God," so as to deceive the masses regarding this proper name for God. What utter nonsense. Back in the days of the apostles, thousands of copies of their gospels and epistles were sent throughout the Mid-East. And today we still have six to seven thousand copies of those copies. And those letters were duplicated and sent out immediately after they were written. They were distributed to church after church and congregation after congregation and family after family. How many copies were sent through the Roman world only God only knows. Follow this: Thousands of copies of the Apostle's letters were send to thousands of people, families, and church congregations during those early years. And many of those copies of copies have come down to us today. How then, is it even in the realm of possibility that someone or an entire army of people could go out and locate all of those thousands of Greek epistles; then confiscate them; then fraudulently erase 200 references to Jehovah and insert either "God" or "Lord" in their place; and then return them again to their rightful owners? Are they serious? Apparently. But no, it never happened. The Holy Spirit of God did not inspire all of the New Testament writers to use the Hebrew name YHWH transliterated to "Jehovah," hundreds of times in their gospels and epistles. On the other hand, let's ask ourselves a serious question: If Jesus said He came to exalt, honor, and manifest His Father's Name, wouldn't there have to be at least a few examples of Jesus Himself using His Father's Name Jehovah somewhere in the gospels? Surely the Jehovah's Witnesses must have such a copy where the Greek retained the supposed use of the name "Jehovah" in the New Testament. Don't they have such a Greek manuscript from which they made their New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures? Nope, they don't. Where the Greek said "Lord" (Greek: kurios, not YHWH), they changed it to "Jehovah." And where the Greek said "God" (Greek: theos, not YHWH), they translated it to "Jehovah. But that is not translating. That is interpretation. God has not given man the authority to make such changes to His Word (Rev. 22:18-19). The Name "Jehovah" comes from the tetragrammaton which consists of the letters YHWH. These letters when transliterated into the English become "Jehovah." See further explanation below. WHERE ARE ALL THOSE MISSING MANUSCRIPTS? Some argue that the original gospels, for example, where not written in Greek, but in Hebrew, and certainly the Father's Name, YHWH, would HAVE to be in them. But there are no Hebrew gospels written by the apostles. No one has ever found even one. If multiple thousands of Greek manuscripts escaped this theory of the Jehovah Witnesses, where are they? Where are even a few such Greek manuscripts containing the Name Jehovah? Is there a Greek manuscript of the New Testament anywhere on earth that contains the tetragrammaton-YHWH, Jehovah? No there isn't, because there never were any in the first place Jesus spoke Jehovah’s name regularly and the gospels were written under inspiration, so that means Jehovah personally saw to it that his name was included in his word because it is his will that “the nations must know that I am Jehovah.” As I pointed out before it is the false religionist that seek to remove HIS name. Ezekiel 39:6, 7 6 “‘And I will send fire upon Ma′gog and upon those who are inhabiting the islands in security; and people will have to know that I am Jehovah. 7 And my holy name I shall make known in the midst of my people Israel, and I shall no more let my holy name be profaned; and the nations will have to know that I am Jehovah,….’ John 17:25-26 25 Righteous Father, the world has, indeed, not come to know you; but I have come to know you, and these have come to know that you sent me forth. 26 And I have made your name known to them and will make it known, in order that the love with which you loved me may be in them and I in union with them.” Jesus also prayed for HIS FATHER’S NAME be sanctified. Matthew 6:9 9 “You must pray, then, this way: “‘Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified. This dropping Jehovah’s name is nothing new: Jeremiah 23:26-27 How long will it exist in the heart of the prophets who are prophesying the falsehood and who are prophets of the trickiness of their own heart? They are thinking of making my people forget my name by means of their dreams that they keep relating each one to the other, just as their fathers forgot my name by means of Baal. (Baal means Lord) Last Edited by Daniel7 on 01/12/2018 01:40 PM |