Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,098 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,097,389
Pageviews Today: 1,527,408Threads Today: 412Posts Today: 7,449
12:34 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.

 
Uncle of an Uncle
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 71182712
United States
02/07/2018 04:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
This is an article from Foxnews today.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

SpaceX is betting on E-Sail technology to propel future spacecraft to Mars and beyond. Technology linked below.

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

I was wondering how we were going to get to Mars in 30 days according to the article and what technology was going to be employed.

So a few numbers first:

Mean miles to Mars from Earth: 140,000,000
Light speed (LS) @ MPH: 670,616,629
LS converted to MPD (day) 16,094,799,105
(0.03)LSMPD to reach Mars in 30 days: 536,493,303
LSMPD converted to LSMPH for 30 days to Mars: 22,353,887

If my math is basically correct and if this E-Sail can be produced into a real world device.

I have a few questions that I am not fully understanding concerning the trip to Mars.

#1: The closer we are to the sun the greater the force can be applied to the E-sail via photon repulsion. I wonder how long it takes to achieve .03 LS (mean) using this technology. And this is based off and average solar wind speed.

#2: Suppose you zooming along at 22,353,887 MPH and you hit a very small space rock (micro-meteor). For a comparison we can understand, a .50 cal Muzzle Velocity is 1909 MPH (2800 fps), that's 0.00008539901 of the projected mean speed of the spacecraft. My guess is "if" you run into ANYTHING however so small at that speed your craft will be instantly vaporized.

#3: Unless I am missing something, and I might be. It looks that the E-sail is only good for a one-way trip. I don't think it can "swim up stream" against the solar wind. So then it looks as if storing massive fuel tanks for return trips would be the only way back home.

Just a few ideas this morning....
Uncle of an Uncle
Uncle of an Uncle  (OP)

User ID: 71182712
United States
02/07/2018 04:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
No takers on this topic?

I was hoping that we had some rocket scientist here on GLP that could shed some light on this.
Uncle of an Uncle
REBEL ROUSER

User ID: 60844085
United States
02/07/2018 05:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
I was surprised he said it has gone past Mars and into the Asteroid belt , I thought it took six months to get to Mars
.
.
NOTHING EVER STAYS THE SAME
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76223730
Germany
02/07/2018 05:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
Topic about a green screen ? While they work on a shadow project in space ?
Uncle of an Uncle  (OP)

User ID: 71182712
United States
02/07/2018 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
This is an article from Foxnews today.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

SpaceX is betting on E-Sail technology to propel future spacecraft to Mars and beyond. Technology linked below.

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

I was wondering how we were going to get to Mars in 30 days according to the article and what technology was going to be employed.

So a few numbers first:

Mean miles to Mars from Earth: 140,000,000
Light speed (LS) @ MPH: 670,616,629
LS converted to MPD (day) 16,094,799,105
(0.03)LSMPD to reach Mars in 30 days: 536,493,303
LSMPD converted to LSMPH for 30 days to Mars: 22,353,887

If my math is basically correct and if this E-Sail can be produced into a real world device.

I have a few questions that I am not fully understanding concerning the trip to Mars.

#1: The closer we are to the sun the greater the force can be applied to the E-sail via photon repulsion. I wonder how long it takes to achieve .03 LS (mean) using this technology. And this is based off and average solar wind speed.

#2: Suppose you zooming along at 22,353,887 MPH and you hit a very small space rock (micro-meteor). For a comparison we can understand, a .50 cal Muzzle Velocity is 1909 MPH (2800 fps), that's 0.00008539901 of the projected mean speed of the spacecraft. My guess is "if" you run into ANYTHING however so small at that speed your craft will be instantly vaporized.

#3: Unless I am missing something, and I might be. It looks that the E-sail is only good for a one-way trip. I don't think it can "swim up stream" against the solar wind. So then it looks as if storing massive fuel tanks for return trips would be the only way back home.

Just a few ideas this morning....
 Quoting: Uncle of an Uncle


#4: There will come a point during the trip to Mars you will need to apply the brakes in which to slow down. This can't be done with aerobraking at this speed, which only leaves you with having to build an ion drive or store fuel for the burn. Having said this, I wonder if E-sail is even the right device for this type of travel.
Uncle of an Uncle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 69039017
United States
02/07/2018 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
This is an article from Foxnews today.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

SpaceX is betting on E-Sail technology to propel future spacecraft to Mars and beyond. Technology linked below.

[link to www.nasa.gov (secure)]

I was wondering how we were going to get to Mars in 30 days according to the article and what technology was going to be employed.

So a few numbers first:

Mean miles to Mars from Earth: 140,000,000
Light speed (LS) @ MPH: 670,616,629
LS converted to MPD (day) 16,094,799,105
(0.03)LSMPD to reach Mars in 30 days: 536,493,303
LSMPD converted to LSMPH for 30 days to Mars: 22,353,887

If my math is basically correct and if this E-Sail can be produced into a real world device.

I have a few questions that I am not fully understanding concerning the trip to Mars.

#1: The closer we are to the sun the greater the force can be applied to the E-sail via photon repulsion. I wonder how long it takes to achieve .03 LS (mean) using this technology. And this is based off and average solar wind speed.

#2: Suppose you zooming along at 22,353,887 MPH and you hit a very small space rock (micro-meteor). For a comparison we can understand, a .50 cal Muzzle Velocity is 1909 MPH (2800 fps), that's 0.00008539901 of the projected mean speed of the spacecraft. My guess is "if" you run into ANYTHING however so small at that speed your craft will be instantly vaporized.

#3: Unless I am missing something, and I might be. It looks that the E-sail is only good for a one-way trip. I don't think it can "swim up stream" against the solar wind. So then it looks as if storing massive fuel tanks for return trips would be the only way back home.

Just a few ideas this morning....
 Quoting: Uncle of an Uncle


#4: There will come a point during the trip to Mars you will need to apply the brakes in which to slow down. This can't be done with aerobraking at this speed, which only leaves you with having to build an ion drive or store fuel for the burn. Having said this, I wonder if E-sail is even the right device for this type of travel.
 Quoting: Uncle of an Uncle


trump-HRYK
Westsail
Metta

User ID: 72384418
United States
02/07/2018 08:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
You guys do realize we’ve sent probes to the red planet before right?
Some have even been successful. And it has always been a 1-way trip. It is theoretically possible that at a later stage fuel could be produced on Mars. Initially oxygen and water will be the priorities.

Here’s a good primer:

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Last Edited by Westsail on 02/07/2018 08:23 PM
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed. -Albert Einstein
Uncle of an Uncle  (OP)

User ID: 71182712
United States
02/07/2018 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: SpaceX proposed trip to Mars and some basic math.
You guys do realize we’ve sent probes to the red planet before right?
Some have even been successful. And it has always been a 1-way trip. It is theoretically possible that at a later stage fuel could be produced on Mars. Initially oxygen and water will be the priorities.
 Quoting: Westsail


I 100% with what your saying.

I am just looking at the concept of utilizing the E-sail for the Mars mission, which is currently the proposed option for this mission.

I am not a rocket scientist, nor do I play one on TV. However, I am pretty good with a calculator.

The numbers (time/distance) proposed for travel, the shielding for micro-meteors/radiation protection, the fuel needed for slow down, the fuel needed for return.

None of them can be real.
Uncle of an Uncle





GLP