Transporting antimatter in a van | |
Ruh Roh User ID: 79228796 United States 08/12/2020 04:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78012987 United States 08/12/2020 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wrong. There are multiple ways to contain antimatter dumbass. If there weren't any way to do so PET scan machines couldn't work as they require a supply of positrons to do the imaging that they do. Positrons are anti protons. The AF though has long since moved past needing to store them since they discovered a method of creating a beyond unity method of creating positrons on demand that causes a Cascade effect giving far more positrons than should be possible given the input power levels. There's nothing particularly unsafe about this experiment especially given the extremely tiny amounts of antimatter I question. It's amazing though how many people on here speak so authoritatively on subjects they obviously know fuckall about I know "fuckall" about antimatter. Please explain what positrons have to do with this situation. Anti matter sounds scary but I dont believe its dangerous in this situation at all. Give some terrorists cell a modern day nuke and they still wouldnt be able to detonate it properly lol. well we don't know what anti-matter they are using. but the "Positron" is anti-matter. and it is the mirror image "partner" to the Electron. and since they carry a charge, they would fit nicely into a magnetic bottle. THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF POSITRON a subatomic particle with the same mass as an electron and a numerically equal but positive charge. CLEARLY NOT ANTI MATTER |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78268490 United States 08/12/2020 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mr. Smokey
User ID: 78813670 United States 08/12/2020 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We're nowhere near able to produce AM at our technological level. smokey |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 08/12/2020 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: roguetechie81 Wrong. There are multiple ways to contain antimatter dumbass. If there weren't any way to do so PET scan machines couldn't work as they require a supply of positrons to do the imaging that they do. Positrons are anti protons. The AF though has long since moved past needing to store them since they discovered a method of creating a beyond unity method of creating positrons on demand that causes a Cascade effect giving far more positrons than should be possible given the input power levels. There's nothing particularly unsafe about this experiment especially given the extremely tiny amounts of antimatter I question. It's amazing though how many people on here speak so authoritatively on subjects they obviously know fuckall about I know "fuckall" about antimatter. Please explain what positrons have to do with this situation. Anti matter sounds scary but I dont believe its dangerous in this situation at all. Give some terrorists cell a modern day nuke and they still wouldnt be able to detonate it properly lol. well we don't know what anti-matter they are using. but the "Positron" is anti-matter. and it is the mirror image "partner" to the Electron. and since they carry a charge, they would fit nicely into a magnetic bottle. THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF POSITRON a subatomic particle with the same mass as an electron and a numerically equal but positive charge. CLEARLY NOT ANTI MATTER "CLEARLY NOT ANTI MATTER" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78012987 United States 08/12/2020 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No. It's photons. However, gamma photons do have the capability to create matter through pair production. It's essentially reverse annihilation. Sounds like a neat trick to convert energy into matter. ENERGY IS A FORCE FORCE IS CAUSED BY VIOLENCE VIOLENCE IS CAUSED BY SATAN WHO IS ANTI GOD ANTI MATTER |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79259631 United States 08/12/2020 09:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THERE IS NO WAY TO CONTAIN ANTI MATTER Wrong. There are multiple ways to contain antimatter dumbass. If there weren't any way to do so PET scan machines couldn't work as they require a supply of positrons to do the imaging that they do. Positrons are anti protons. The AF though has long since moved past needing to store them since they discovered a method of creating a beyond unity method of creating positrons on demand that causes a Cascade effect giving far more positrons than should be possible given the input power levels. There's nothing particularly unsafe about this experiment especially given the extremely tiny amounts of antimatter I question. It's amazing though how many people on here speak so authoritatively on subjects they obviously know fuckall about Positrons are NOT anti-protons! Positrons have the mass of an electron with a positive charge. Anti-Protons have the mass of a proton with a negative charge. They can make anti-matter with reversed charges relative to normal matter that will annihilate in the presence of normal matter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78339125 United Kingdom 08/13/2020 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |