QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36729630 United States 02/07/2019 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. He's not speaking about the investigation, he's speaking about how the presidency is attacked from everywhere no matter who is president. Everyone thinks they can have their finger in the pie and get the president to do what they want and fore sake the American people. And, don't know about you but most people voted for Trump because he refused to share his income tax. Because he refused to give in to all their demands. And, if you recall, maddow had one of his taxes and he paid and paid and paid. The point being that the president puts everything in a blind trust and has no idea what is going on is all that needs to be done. And he's making us remember that congress changed the rules about how they can invest and made a huge deal of it sort of "see we are holding ourselves accountable" and then the very next bill they repealed it all. What an insult to the American people. Believe early on we discovered that you may not indict a sitting president. You can investigate them but you may not indict them. You can impeach them but you can't do anything until they have left office. With the leaks and the press you have to agree that this has not just been a normal investigation, it has been a circus. That's what the president is speaking about. |
Cameldriver
User ID: 76945939 United States 02/07/2019 11:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74541389 United States 02/07/2019 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. He's not speaking about the investigation, he's speaking about how the presidency is attacked from everywhere no matter who is president. Everyone thinks they can have their finger in the pie and get the president to do what they want and fore sake the American people. And, don't know about you but most people voted for Trump because he refused to share his income tax. Because he refused to give in to all their demands. And, if you recall, maddow had one of his taxes and he paid and paid and paid. The point being that the president puts everything in a blind trust and has no idea what is going on is all that needs to be done. And he's making us remember that congress changed the rules about how they can invest and made a huge deal of it sort of "see we are holding ourselves accountable" and then the very next bill they repealed it all. What an insult to the American people. Believe early on we discovered that you may not indict a sitting president. You can investigate them but you may not indict them. You can impeach them but you can't do anything until they have left office. With the leaks and the press you have to agree that this has not just been a normal investigation, it has been a circus. That's what the president is speaking about. He has also said the R`s did not do it to the D`s, that noting would have ever gotten done. To me, it sounds like he is supporting a no investigation what so ever of sitting presidents. Perhaps sitting presidents should not be above indictment and conviction. Maybe we would not be in the precarious position we find ourselves in today with virtually no control over those we supposedly elect. None of this seems right to me and it sounds like he is potentially setting the stage for when nothing happens he can say 'see, I was innocent, lets make sure this does not happen again.' Next thing you know, law is passed and now can they not only not be indicted or convicted but now no longer even investigated. Even Presidents should not be above the law, in fact they should be the ones that hold the laws above all else and are examples of such. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36729630 United States 02/07/2019 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. He's not speaking about the investigation, he's speaking about how the presidency is attacked from everywhere no matter who is president. Everyone thinks they can have their finger in the pie and get the president to do what they want and fore sake the American people. And, don't know about you but most people voted for Trump because he refused to share his income tax. Because he refused to give in to all their demands. And, if you recall, maddow had one of his taxes and he paid and paid and paid. The point being that the president puts everything in a blind trust and has no idea what is going on is all that needs to be done. And he's making us remember that congress changed the rules about how they can invest and made a huge deal of it sort of "see we are holding ourselves accountable" and then the very next bill they repealed it all. What an insult to the American people. Believe early on we discovered that you may not indict a sitting president. You can investigate them but you may not indict them. You can impeach them but you can't do anything until they have left office. With the leaks and the press you have to agree that this has not just been a normal investigation, it has been a circus. That's what the president is speaking about. He has also said the R`s did not do it to the D`s, that noting would have ever gotten done. To me, it sounds like he is supporting a no investigation what so ever of sitting presidents. Perhaps sitting presidents should not be above indictment and conviction. Maybe we would not be in the precarious position we find ourselves in today with virtually no control over those we supposedly elect. None of this seems right to me and it sounds like he is potentially setting the stage for when nothing happens he can say 'see, I was innocent, lets make sure this does not happen again.' Next thing you know, law is passed and now can they not only not be indicted or convicted but now no longer even investigated. Even Presidents should not be above the law, in fact they should be the ones that hold the laws above all else and are examples of such. I hear what you are saying but, knowing trump, don't think that is what he's wanting to do. But, this is not the place to discuss this and I noticed that there is a thread on the front page: Thread: BREAKING!!! TRUMP PISSED: PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again!!! |
Vasily
User ID: 72304389 United States 02/07/2019 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. He's not speaking about the investigation, he's speaking about how the presidency is attacked from everywhere no matter who is president. Everyone thinks they can have their finger in the pie and get the president to do what they want and fore sake the American people. And, don't know about you but most people voted for Trump because he refused to share his income tax. Because he refused to give in to all their demands. And, if you recall, maddow had one of his taxes and he paid and paid and paid. The point being that the president puts everything in a blind trust and has no idea what is going on is all that needs to be done. And he's making us remember that congress changed the rules about how they can invest and made a huge deal of it sort of "see we are holding ourselves accountable" and then the very next bill they repealed it all. What an insult to the American people. Believe early on we discovered that you may not indict a sitting president. You can investigate them but you may not indict them. You can impeach them but you can't do anything until they have left office. With the leaks and the press you have to agree that this has not just been a normal investigation, it has been a circus. That's what the president is speaking about. He has also said the R`s did not do it to the D`s, that noting would have ever gotten done. To me, it sounds like he is supporting a no investigation what so ever of sitting presidents. Perhaps sitting presidents should not be above indictment and conviction. Maybe we would not be in the precarious position we find ourselves in today with virtually no control over those we supposedly elect. None of this seems right to me and it sounds like he is potentially setting the stage for when nothing happens he can say 'see, I was innocent, lets make sure this does not happen again.' Next thing you know, law is passed and now can they not only not be indicted or convicted but now no longer even investigated. Even Presidents should not be above the law, in fact they should be the ones that hold the laws above all else and are examples of such. Investigations as harassment has been going on at least since Bill Clinton. It's intended to disrupt implementation of an agenda, by tying the president up with legal procedures. In Trump's case, they are bringing the house, because his agenda is very real and long lasting change. IMO |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36729630 United States 02/07/2019 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Natural One
User ID: 73776183 United States 02/07/2019 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intredasting.... @POTUS_Schedule was suspended... overnight? The twattage after the SOTU had some photos included of the POTUS entourage before and after, with some picts from within the limousine that POTUS was in... clock on dashboard showed up clearly... here is last known twattage page: [link to imgur.com (secure)] here are the picts from within the limo: [link to imgur.com (secure)] with clock showing 20:43 [link to imgur.com (secure)] with clock showing 22:41 IF, this is the limo called "The Beast" with POTUS within... speculation on the anonsite is that possibly POTUS took the pictures.... could it be... Q??? here is the gugel cache link: [link to webcache.googleusercontent.com (secure)] _______________________________________________________ [link to twitter.com (secure)] Lisa Mei Crowley ‏ @LisaMei62 8h8 hours ago WTH?! It appears the @POTUS_Schedule account has been suspended. 223 replies 853 retweets 1,039 likes Sportsgirlnj16 ‏ @Sportsgirlnj16 Replying to @LisaMei62 @POTUS_Schedule These pics were posted prior to them shutting it down Lis. There was one more shared from @POTUS_Schedule. The time on dash reads 18:50 & you can see that it was retweeted by 72 Seconds with the caption 18:50. But it’s gone. 3:52 AM - 7 Feb 2019 TRUST THE PLAN - Q |
The Natural One
User ID: 73776183 United States 02/07/2019 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Natural One
User ID: 73776183 United States 02/07/2019 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Aborted fetus parts fused with mice.... Frankenstein like experiments... done. okay, I have been adequately HORRIFIED for the day... Quoting: The Natural One ___________________________________________________________ [link to www.thesun.co.uk (secure)] MUTANT MICE Aborted babies’ BODY PARTS fused with mice to ‘humanise’ them for grim ‘Frankenstein’ experiments in US labs Abortion clinics have been supplying researchers in the United States with terminated fetuses, parts of which are then fused with rodents as part of a bid to stamp out diseases and save millions of people By Patrick Knox 6th February 2019, 3:56 pmUpdated: 6th February 2019, 6:34 pm Can you make a thread about that, please? TRUST THE PLAN - Q |
troungshixam
User ID: 77195349 United States 02/07/2019 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. Crimes should be investigated. People should never be investigated to see if maybe they might have have ever committed a crime they could be charged with. troungshixam |
Paranoid Chick
User ID: 75237446 United States 02/07/2019 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. Crimes should be investigated. People should never be investigated to see if maybe they might have have ever committed a crime they could be charged with. This. Mueller and the rest aren't investigating a CRIME - they are investigating a PERSON, which is highly illegal, unethical, and completely counter to our values and justice system. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17924229 United States 02/07/2019 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Crimes should be investigated. People should never be investigated to see if maybe they might have have ever committed a crime they could be charged with. Quoting: troungshixam This. Mueller and the rest aren't investigating a CRIME - they are investigating a PERSON, which is highly illegal, unethical, and completely counter to our values and justice system. :this1: |
The Natural One
User ID: 73776183 United States 02/07/2019 01:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Intredasting statement dropped today __________________________________________________________________________________ [link to www.whitehouse.gov (secure)] Statements & Releases Statement from the President Issued on: February 7, 2019 Each year, America pauses to remember its fallen astronaut heroes and the great accomplishments for which they strived. Melania and I mourn their passing and take to heart the lessons of their lives and the greater human potential to which they continue to inspire. As our Nation continues to lead the world in forging a pathway to space, we honor the legacy of these brave men and women. We vow to continue building the bold future they envisioned for all of humanity on this Earth and beyond. Though our friends, colleagues, and family members have left this Earth, they will always be with us as we journey among the stars. The loss of the courageous crews from Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia was not in vain. As Americans, our unwavering commitment to continue their heroic journey is unparalleled in the history of human exploration. We will continue to move forward and reach for new heights. We will persevere. And by doing so, we will lead the world into a new era of discovery. TRUST THE PLAN - Q |
rachel3108
User ID: 76960538 United States 02/07/2019 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOTABLE - TRUMP QUOTES Q DROP BIBLE VERSE!! Anon post!! #QAnon #PrayerBreakfast @realDonaldTrump “For I know the planss I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prospert you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” Jeremiah 29:11 —> 11:11 (#QProof) [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
hankie
Everything User ID: 76897763 United States 02/07/2019 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am just sitting here thinking about those strange black faced pictures, no one said anything about the black or brown face picture with the men in dresses on, that one was strange. I still puzzled for the reasons the did this, it was not something most southerns did, not to my recollect, frat parties and initiations of those time were pretty well pushed on you men joining them. I really do not understand at this year, why were would they have done this? Quoting: hankie Hillary should stay very quit with the black faces they all got up to in costumes. Blacks are not black, makeup will make you slightly darker, only there still is not reason, unless a black wants you to for some reason. I could happen to see if black and whites look alike in brown shin tones, they do, I can see they do. It just shin color and hair, and that is not all that important. I wish someone would show the actor long ago who know one knew as a white guy playing a black guy on a TV show, I believe it was a comic act slap stick type. I had no idea and I watched it, that he was white play a black man, he wore makeup. I knew a man played a women all his career, just because he could not get a job as a male. He as a woman did more than work, he was sort of a star back them. I keep thinking was it Carol Chaning? Spelling, don't know, If he told which one, I do not remember him saying so. As for this other crap, it not good, and being a democrat make it really bad. It was Red Skelton. That was one of his ongoing characters. Also Fred Astaire and Judy Garland had characters that wore blackface in Easter Parade. But it was just dirt smudges. Bing Crosby donned blakface for Holiday Inn. I’ve been waiting for that movie to be banned!, No, it was not like Red Skelton act, or Bing Crosby, it was a comedian who was older than these, the never said anything about being white at all, everyone just took him to be a black man playing a black man. I was not black face, it was totally looking like a black man. It part the history of Hollywood. He was black as for as anyone else knew back then. He was not doing black face, he was playing as a black man period. Much like the Italian played American Indians for a long time, it stopped for the Italians when the Native had enough, they wanted to play the parts of the Indian cause they were actors and it just wasn't right. Why this comedy was able to do this is strange, or there was not a black who did comedy. He had a partner in the show, I just can not remember the name. It was done so well, you would not have even guess he was white. Sorry I got a headache These are the times that tries men's and women's souls! May we come though it victorious! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74541389 United States 02/07/2019 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. Crimes should be investigated. People should never be investigated to see if maybe they might have have ever committed a crime they could be charged with. This. Mueller and the rest aren't investigating a CRIME - they are investigating a PERSON, which is highly illegal, unethical, and completely counter to our values and justice system. Yet this happens everyday to the people. Ever been pulled over because they ran your tag while not actually committing a crime? I have, for stupid stuff like emissions. I am not saying it is right however if anyone should be thorughly investigated and vetted, it should be those who hold leadership positions. These are our representatives who are doing unspeakable things in our names, if the politicians were investigated properly prior to being elected, even without evidence of a crime, perhaps we would not have such satanic mf'ers in power now. Maybe many more of the wars and atrocities our governments are responsible for may not have occurred if we simply investigated the politicians prior and during their term for the plain and simple fact that they should be held to a much higher standard, considering they are speaking for us essentially. His comment concerns me because it could point to intention 'this should never happen again.' Even less accountability to those who should be held to the highest accountability. |
Snowed In Oregon
User ID: 77327508 United States 02/07/2019 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am just sitting here thinking about those strange black faced pictures, no one said anything about the black or brown face picture with the men in dresses on, that one was strange. I still puzzled for the reasons the did this, it was not something most southerns did, not to my recollect, frat parties and initiations of those time were pretty well pushed on you men joining them. I really do not understand at this year, why were would they have done this? Quoting: hankie Hillary should stay very quit with the black faces they all got up to in costumes. Blacks are not black, makeup will make you slightly darker, only there still is not reason, unless a black wants you to for some reason. I could happen to see if black and whites look alike in brown shin tones, they do, I can see they do. It just shin color and hair, and that is not all that important. I wish someone would show the actor long ago who know one knew as a white guy playing a black guy on a TV show, I believe it was a comic act slap stick type. I had no idea and I watched it, that he was white play a black man, he wore makeup. I knew a man played a women all his career, just because he could not get a job as a male. He as a woman did more than work, he was sort of a star back them. I keep thinking was it Carol Chaning? Spelling, don't know, If he told which one, I do not remember him saying so. As for this other crap, it not good, and being a democrat make it really bad. It was Red Skelton. That was one of his ongoing characters. Also Fred Astaire and Judy Garland had characters that wore blackface in Easter Parade. But it was just dirt smudges. Bing Crosby donned blakface for Holiday Inn. I’ve been waiting for that movie to be banned!, No, it was not like Red Skelton act, or Bing Crosby, it was a comedian who was older than these, the never said anything about being white at all, everyone just took him to be a black man playing a black man. I was not black face, it was totally looking like a black man. It part the history of Hollywood. He was black as for as anyone else knew back then. He was not doing black face, he was playing as a black man period. Much like the Italian played American Indians for a long time, it stopped for the Italians when the Native had enough, they wanted to play the parts of the Indian cause they were actors and it just wasn't right. Why this comedy was able to do this is strange, or there was not a black who did comedy. He had a partner in the show, I just can not remember the name. It was done so well, you would not have even guess he was white. Not Al Jolson? If I remember correctly, he was vaudville. |
Misspurrrrrect
User ID: 15572297 United States 02/07/2019 02:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to twitter.com (secure)] Quoting: The Natural One Donald J. Trump ‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT! It should never be allowed to happen again! 4:37 AM - 7 Feb 2019 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. He's not speaking about the investigation, he's speaking about how the presidency is attacked from everywhere no matter who is president. Everyone thinks they can have their finger in the pie and get the president to do what they want and fore sake the American people. And, don't know about you but most people voted for Trump because he refused to share his income tax. Because he refused to give in to all their demands. And, if you recall, maddow had one of his taxes and he paid and paid and paid. The point being that the president puts everything in a blind trust and has no idea what is going on is all that needs to be done. And he's making us remember that congress changed the rules about how they can invest and made a huge deal of it sort of "see we are holding ourselves accountable" and then the very next bill they repealed it all. What an insult to the American people. Believe early on we discovered that you may not indict a sitting president. You can investigate them but you may not indict them. You can impeach them but you can't do anything until they have left office. With the leaks and the press you have to agree that this has not just been a normal investigation, it has been a circus. That's what the president is speaking about. He has also said the R`s did not do it to the D`s, that noting would have ever gotten done. To me, it sounds like he is supporting a no investigation what so ever of sitting presidents. Perhaps sitting presidents should not be above indictment and conviction. Maybe we would not be in the precarious position we find ourselves in today with virtually no control over those we supposedly elect. None of this seems right to me and it sounds like he is potentially setting the stage for when nothing happens he can say 'see, I was innocent, lets make sure this does not happen again.' Next thing you know, law is passed and now can they not only not be indicted or convicted but now no longer even investigated. Even Presidents should not be above the law, in fact they should be the ones that hold the laws above all else and are examples of such. Then tell me why Obama was NEVER held accountable for his proven fake birth certificate? The fact that he was not a natural born citizen (and before you say it was not proven let me tell you the frickin Congress knew about it! Brian Bilbray admitted it to some of his voters and said he wouldn't expose Obama because he didn't want to be the laughing stock of the Congress!) There is a radio interview with a couple of radio personalities from Detroit that speak with an African Ambassador that tells them the birthplace of Obama IN KANYA is well known: [link to youtu.be (secure)] Tell me more about Presidents who are not above the law. Tell me why Clinton (both Clintons for that matter) got away with selling, trading, and giving our intelligence to China! Bush senior got away with being involved with the JFK thing for years. The Silver lining is that perhaps now, since Bush senior's demise, the tide will change and justice will prevail. We could go back many more presidents and hundreds of politicians, through the years, an there is something wrong with all of them. The defining elements in these "investigations" though range from being aggravating to ridiculous. President Trump has been under extreme scrutiny since before he was elected. They have found nothing for which he can be blamed. The latest effort now is just making a crime fit a person. Enough is enough! Pres Trump has been examined thoroughly, so he has never been above the law. You should be satisfied! |
rachel3108
User ID: 76960538 United States 02/07/2019 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is @realDonaldTrump doing in this clip from the #SOTU address? (Standing at the head of the chamber, he turns around and nods to someone behind him during the applause) [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74541389 United States 02/07/2019 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then tell me why Obama was NEVER held accountable for his proven fake birth certificate? The fact that he was not a natural born citizen (and before you say it was not proven let me tell you the frickin Congress knew about it! Brian Bilbray admitted it to some of his voters and said he wouldn't expose Obama because he didn't want to be the laughing stock of the Congress!) There is a radio interview with a couple of radio personalities from Detroit that speak with an African Ambassador that tells them the birthplace of Obama IN KANYA is well known: [link to youtu.be (secure)] Quoting: Tell me more about Presidents who are not above the law. Tell me why Clinton (both Clintons for that matter) got away with selling, trading, and giving our intelligence to China! Bush senior got away with being involved with the JFK thing for years. The Silver lining is that perhaps now, since Bush senior's demise, the tide will change and justice will prevail. We could go back many more presidents and hundreds of politicians, through the years, an there is something wrong with all of them. The defining elements in these "investigations" though range from being aggravating to ridiculous. President Trump has been under extreme scrutiny since before he was elected. They have found nothing for which he can be blamed. The latest effort now is just making a crime fit a person. Enough is enough! Pres Trump has been examined thoroughly, so he has never been above the law. You should be satisfied! You and I are on the same page, I agree the same standards that are being held to Trump were not held to former Presidents. BUT if Trump does not see this through and come out of it as clean as possible, then it solidifies the double standard. If 'the harassment should never happen again', does that not open the door to potentially the same standard never being applied to actual criminals? This is what concerns me about his comments. If he is clean as expected and his statement comes to fruition, 'this never happens again', then those that are dirty who follow him will be above investigation? IMO, politicians should be investigated prior and during their term, held to a higher standard. Instead, it is the other way around, the people are constantly convicted of meaningless crimes while politicians get away with everything. His comments made me wonder about his intention. I am not for frivolous attacks, however when it comes to any and all politicians, perhaps nothing should be considered frivolous until we are able to take out all the satanic trash. |
Cameldriver
User ID: 76945939 United States 02/07/2019 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am just sitting here thinking about those strange black faced pictures, no one said anything about the black or brown face picture with the men in dresses on, that one was strange. I still puzzled for the reasons the did this, it was not something most southerns did, not to my recollect, frat parties and initiations of those time were pretty well pushed on you men joining them. I really do not understand at this year, why were would they have done this? Quoting: hankie Hillary should stay very quit with the black faces they all got up to in costumes. Blacks are not black, makeup will make you slightly darker, only there still is not reason, unless a black wants you to for some reason. I could happen to see if black and whites look alike in brown shin tones, they do, I can see they do. It just shin color and hair, and that is not all that important. I wish someone would show the actor long ago who know one knew as a white guy playing a black guy on a TV show, I believe it was a comic act slap stick type. I had no idea and I watched it, that he was white play a black man, he wore makeup. I knew a man played a women all his career, just because he could not get a job as a male. He as a woman did more than work, he was sort of a star back them. I keep thinking was it Carol Chaning? Spelling, don't know, If he told which one, I do not remember him saying so. As for this other crap, it not good, and being a democrat make it really bad. It was Red Skelton. That was one of his ongoing characters. Also Fred Astaire and Judy Garland had characters that wore blackface in Easter Parade. But it was just dirt smudges. Bing Crosby donned blakface for Holiday Inn. I’ve been waiting for that movie to be banned!, No, it was not like Red Skelton act, or Bing Crosby, it was a comedian who was older than these, the never said anything about being white at all, everyone just took him to be a black man playing a black man. I was not black face, it was totally looking like a black man. It part the history of Hollywood. He was black as for as anyone else knew back then. He was not doing black face, he was playing as a black man period. Much like the Italian played American Indians for a long time, it stopped for the Italians when the Native had enough, they wanted to play the parts of the Indian cause they were actors and it just wasn't right. Why this comedy was able to do this is strange, or there was not a black who did comedy. He had a partner in the show, I just can not remember the name. It was done so well, you would not have even guess he was white. Not Al Jolson? If I remember correctly, he was vaudville. My thought is, are they going to start banning these people like they did with Robert E. Lee statues and the Confederate flag? How far back do you go? What was the context at the time? What were the intentions? Bing Crosby, Judy Garland, Fred Astair. These are ICONS! Are we going to ban them? Yes. Al Jolson performed in blackface. He would get down on his knee and sing Swanne and Mammie. He was in one of the first “talkies.” How will our children learn? Yes, these were bad things. But, look at how far Society has come. One learns from mistakes. But, if they don’t know about mistakes, they can never learn. |
Cameldriver
User ID: 76945939 United States 02/07/2019 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am just sitting here thinking about those strange black faced pictures, no one said anything about the black or brown face picture with the men in dresses on, that one was strange. I still puzzled for the reasons the did this, it was not something most southerns did, not to my recollect, frat parties and initiations of those time were pretty well pushed on you men joining them. I really do not understand at this year, why were would they have done this? Quoting: hankie Hillary should stay very quit with the black faces they all got up to in costumes. Blacks are not black, makeup will make you slightly darker, only there still is not reason, unless a black wants you to for some reason. I could happen to see if black and whites look alike in brown shin tones, they do, I can see they do. It just shin color and hair, and that is not all that important. I wish someone would show the actor long ago who know one knew as a white guy playing a black guy on a TV show, I believe it was a comic act slap stick type. I had no idea and I watched it, that he was white play a black man, he wore makeup. I knew a man played a women all his career, just because he could not get a job as a male. He as a woman did more than work, he was sort of a star back them. I keep thinking was it Carol Chaning? Spelling, don't know, If he told which one, I do not remember him saying so. As for this other crap, it not good, and being a democrat make it really bad. It was Red Skelton. That was one of his ongoing characters. Also Fred Astaire and Judy Garland had characters that wore blackface in Easter Parade. But it was just dirt smudges. Bing Crosby donned blakface for Holiday Inn. I’ve been waiting for that movie to be banned!, No, it was not like Red Skelton act, or Bing Crosby, it was a comedian who was older than these, the never said anything about being white at all, everyone just took him to be a black man playing a black man. I was not black face, it was totally looking like a black man. It part the history of Hollywood. He was black as for as anyone else knew back then. He was not doing black face, he was playing as a black man period. Much like the Italian played American Indians for a long time, it stopped for the Italians when the Native had enough, they wanted to play the parts of the Indian cause they were actors and it just wasn't right. Why this comedy was able to do this is strange, or there was not a black who did comedy. He had a partner in the show, I just can not remember the name. It was done so well, you would not have even guess he was white. Not Al Jolson? If I remember correctly, he was vaudville. My thought is, are they going to start banning these people like they did with Robert E. Lee statues and the Confederate flag? How far back do you go? What was the context at the time? What were the intentions? Bing Crosby, Judy Garland, Fred Astair. These are ICONS! Are we going to ban them? Yes. Al Jolson performed in blackface. He would get down on his knee and sing Swanne and Mammie. He was in one of the first “talkies.” How will our children learn? Yes, these were bad things. But, look at how far Society has come. One learns from mistakes. But, if they don’t know about mistakes, they can never learn. Maybe the white actor was in Amos and Andy? Last Edited by Cameldriver on 02/07/2019 03:33 PM |
alwaysme
User ID: 77280778 United States 02/07/2019 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then tell me why Obama was NEVER held accountable for his proven fake birth certificate? The fact that he was not a natural born citizen (and before you say it was not proven let me tell you the frickin Congress knew about it! Brian Bilbray admitted it to some of his voters and said he wouldn't expose Obama because he didn't want to be the laughing stock of the Congress!) There is a radio interview with a couple of radio personalities from Detroit that speak with an African Ambassador that tells them the birthplace of Obama IN KANYA is well known: [link to youtu.be (secure)] Quoting: Tell me more about Presidents who are not above the law. Tell me why Clinton (both Clintons for that matter) got away with selling, trading, and giving our intelligence to China! Bush senior got away with being involved with the JFK thing for years. The Silver lining is that perhaps now, since Bush senior's demise, the tide will change and justice will prevail. We could go back many more presidents and hundreds of politicians, through the years, an there is something wrong with all of them. The defining elements in these "investigations" though range from being aggravating to ridiculous. President Trump has been under extreme scrutiny since before he was elected. They have found nothing for which he can be blamed. The latest effort now is just making a crime fit a person. Enough is enough! Pres Trump has been examined thoroughly, so he has never been above the law. You should be satisfied! You and I are on the same page, I agree the same standards that are being held to Trump were not held to former Presidents. BUT if Trump does not see this through and come out of it as clean as possible, then it solidifies the double standard. If 'the harassment should never happen again', does that not open the door to potentially the same standard never being applied to actual criminals? This is what concerns me about his comments. If he is clean as expected and his statement comes to fruition, 'this never happens again', then those that are dirty who follow him will be above investigation? IMO, politicians should be investigated prior and during their term, held to a higher standard. Instead, it is the other way around, the people are constantly convicted of meaningless crimes while politicians get away with everything. His comments made me wonder about his intention. I am not for frivolous attacks, however when it comes to any and all politicians, perhaps nothing should be considered frivolous until we are able to take out all the satanic trash. No one should be "harassed"... He's not talking about legitimate investigations. You know that. . |
alwaysme
User ID: 77280778 United States 02/07/2019 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am just sitting here thinking about those strange black faced pictures, no one said anything about the black or brown face picture with the men in dresses on, that one was strange. I still puzzled for the reasons the did this, it was not something most southerns did, not to my recollect, frat parties and initiations of those time were pretty well pushed on you men joining them. I really do not understand at this year, why were would they have done this? Quoting: hankie Hillary should stay very quit with the black faces they all got up to in costumes. Blacks are not black, makeup will make you slightly darker, only there still is not reason, unless a black wants you to for some reason. I could happen to see if black and whites look alike in brown shin tones, they do, I can see they do. It just shin color and hair, and that is not all that important. I wish someone would show the actor long ago who know one knew as a white guy playing a black guy on a TV show, I believe it was a comic act slap stick type. I had no idea and I watched it, that he was white play a black man, he wore makeup. I knew a man played a women all his career, just because he could not get a job as a male. He as a woman did more than work, he was sort of a star back them. I keep thinking was it Carol Chaning? Spelling, don't know, If he told which one, I do not remember him saying so. As for this other crap, it not good, and being a democrat make it really bad. Yeah, I agree Hankie! 50 years of living in the deep south and I've never seen anyone dressed up in 'blackface' anywhere. WTF are all these people coming from? And what were they really doing? This sudden blackface epidemic is really weird... I'm thinking there's a bigger picture here too. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 61021459 United States 02/07/2019 03:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74541389 This sort of rhetoric concerns me. Presidents should not be above investigation or the law. Lets say somewhere down the line a law is passed that makes presidents above investigation, indictment, etc. What happens if Hillary finally gets in after this sort of law is passed? If he is innocent of everything, why not just go with the flow? When proved innocent, he will look like the better person, the R`s will look like the better party, you attain on the moral high ground. This sort of verbiage from him though concerns me, if it is never allowed to happen again somehow, then how will crooks like Obama, Bush etc be dealt with? Where would it go from there? Would governors become above investigation? Would baby killers in NY and VA and elsewhere all of a sudden be above investigation and indictment too? I realize I am getting ahead of what is actually happening and perhaps what is being said, I just do not care for this statement he has made. If he is innocent, let it play out and assume the moral high ground. I can not see any way around these witch hunts, if you somehow pass laws that discourage them, then what happens when one is actually required? His statement sure makes me wonder about his motives. Crimes should be investigated. People should never be investigated to see if maybe they might have have ever committed a crime they could be charged with. This. Mueller and the rest aren't investigating a CRIME - they are investigating a PERSON, which is highly illegal, unethical, and completely counter to our values and justice system. Yet this happens everyday to the people. Ever been pulled over because they ran your tag while not actually committing a crime? I have, for stupid stuff like emissions. I am not saying it is right however if anyone should be thorughly investigated and vetted, it should be those who hold leadership positions. These are our representatives who are doing unspeakable things in our names, if the politicians were investigated properly prior to being elected, even without evidence of a crime, perhaps we would not have such satanic mf'ers in power now. Maybe many more of the wars and atrocities our governments are responsible for may not have occurred if we simply investigated the politicians prior and during their term for the plain and simple fact that they should be held to a much higher standard, considering they are speaking for us essentially. His comment concerns me because it could point to intention 'this should never happen again.' Even less accountability to those who should be held to the highest accountability. Where were you when Obama was Pres? All the fricken sealed skeletons in his closet? Why have all those sealed records if nothing to hide? |
keybored
(OP) User ID: 76935526 Belgium 02/07/2019 03:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: Aborted fetus parts fused with mice.... Frankenstein like experiments... Quoting: The Natural One done. okay, I have been adequately HORRIFIED for the day... Quoting: The Natural One ___________________________________________________________ [link to www.thesun.co.uk (secure)] MUTANT MICE Aborted babies’ BODY PARTS fused with mice to ‘humanise’ them for grim ‘Frankenstein’ experiments in US labs Abortion clinics have been supplying researchers in the United States with terminated fetuses, parts of which are then fused with rodents as part of a bid to stamp out diseases and save millions of people By Patrick Knox 6th February 2019, 3:56 pmUpdated: 6th February 2019, 6:34 pm Can you make a thread about that, please? |
alwaysme
User ID: 77280778 United States 02/07/2019 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOTABLE - TRUMP QUOTES Q DROP BIBLE VERSE!! Anon post!! Quoting: rachel3108 #QAnon #PrayerBreakfast @realDonaldTrump “For I know the planss I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prospert you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” Jeremiah 29:11 —> 11:11 (#QProof) [link to twitter.com (secure)] Oh wow, on that thread there is a comment referencing the mystery of Melania's black glove... I hadn't heard anything about that! Does anyone have any more info? We all know Melania is a master troll! . |
alwaysme
User ID: 77280778 United States 02/07/2019 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NOTABLE - TRUMP QUOTES Q DROP BIBLE VERSE!! Anon post!! Quoting: rachel3108 #QAnon #PrayerBreakfast @realDonaldTrump “For I know the planss I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prospert you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” Jeremiah 29:11 —> 11:11 (#QProof) [link to twitter.com (secure)] Oh wow, on that thread there is a comment referencing the mystery of Melania's black glove... I hadn't heard anything about that! Does anyone have any more info? We all know Melania is a master troll! . Heya m'lady!! I can't view on ph. What glove?? Playin hookie today while my new carpet gets installed:) thought i could glp all day but internet is down during install.....so i read a hot cowboy novel.....haven't done that since i found Q!!! Mmmmm.... I love hot cowboys, sigh. Now what were we talking about, oh yeah, Melania's glove! For the SOTU, Melania wore a single black leather glove (on her left hand). Apparently there was a discussion amongst the anons about it... some were thinking it could be a message about RBG. This was the first I'd heard about it, though. I love Melania clues... I think she's wicked smart! ;) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74531175 United States 02/07/2019 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No one should be "harassed"... He's not talking about legitimate investigations. Quoting: You know that. Yet again I will point everyday citizens are being harassed by law enforcement via fishing expeditions. A few months back, a trooper ran my tag and pulled me over because of missed emissions. My registration was suspended, created quite a bit of harassment that was fixed with one simple phone call. Politicians should be held to a much higher standard, if you want to lead, you better be clean as a whistle and open to scrutiny 24/7 or else do not bother running. Perhaps harassment of elected officials will actually drain the swamp once and for all. Applying laws to citizens one way and another to politicians is just hypocrisy and got us into this mess in the first place. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74531175 United States 02/07/2019 05:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Where were you when Obama was Pres? All the fricken sealed skeletons in his closet? Why have all those sealed records if nothing to hide? Quoting: I agree friend, it is obvious to me to attain that level of power requires some degree criminality. They all have blood on their hands and have had for a very long time. It is why I have never supported any political group, I have never been comfortable supporting something that always appeared to me to be abused, misused and broken. I hope to goodness Trump is the peoples savior but I have always been hesitant to look for a savior outside of oneself, too much can go wrong. I think this part of the confusion that has been instilled in the people, no one wants to take responsibility for the mess they are in, blame everyone else and hope someone comes along and fixes for them instead of doing it themselves. |