| Users Online Now: 2,316 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,362,207 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,274,396 | Threads Today: 910 | Posts Today: 16,178 |
| 09:24 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,316 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,362,207 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,274,396 | Threads Today: 910 | Posts Today: 16,178 |
| 09:24 PM | ||
QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78420372  Canada05/19/2020 11:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
bijou
 User ID: 78537656  United States05/19/2020 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So has Q gone from bringing down the cabal to just investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78913558 All this thread has become is USA politics. I hope everything comes off. But Q isn't gonna take down the royal family... Ours, Dutch, Saudi.. Any of the cabal top players. It just isn't going to happen. Trump has been draining the swamp of lots of peados, that's amazing. Keep it up. But it's a pipe dream to think you'll take out the top of the chain. Epstein didn't kill himself. Noone gives a fuck anymore other than saying that comment. They do what they like. They kill and/or rape who they like. There's no way in my lifetime will I see the cabal taken down. Not the rothschilds, not the rockerfellers, the royal family or the Clinton. Obviously my opiniom, and this thread isn't keen on them. So after my ban I'll check in again in a few week. I still want the takedown, just really can't see it. Most of what people get excited over is tidbits or info that everyone turns into a mountain of imagination. Line looking at clouds and seeing animals. Sorry, but it's not going to happen. It's like waiting for flat earthers to reveal the edge. It is difficult to not be at least sympathetic to this poster's comments. It has felt to me in the last few months that the Q team has lost some of it's confidence and certainty. They really seemed to have been blind-sided by the virus. After the impeachment attempt failed, we were assured there would be no step five. Just as soon as we were given that assurance, step five was unfurled, in the form of the Coronavirus. Q was totally silent for awhile, and when they did started addressing it, it felt to me that the message turned a little to more of an expression of woe and consternation, and less of the "we have it all" and "we're in control". Anyhow, I do understand that the whole project is an incredibly massive undertaking and takes time. But it does seem to me that just one arrest (for now) of a major player would do wonders to restoring confidence that things of great import really are happening. Otherwise, surely a lot of people will become demoralized and give up hope - which would be a very dangerous thing going into a critical election. Thanks for your CONCERN, but.... It was actually not difficult at all to NOT feel sympathetic to the above poster. Their first sentence was a contradiction and totally wrong: "So has Q gone from bringing down the cabal to just investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam?" First of all "investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam" IS (in large part) "bringing down the cabal"!!!! Secondly, have you been reading ALL the recent Q posts???? So much fucking more being mentioned than "Trumps Russia collusion scam"!!! Oooh swear words. Tough guy. So what's new? If there's "so much fucking more being mentioned" why don't I see it in this thread? The first guy gave an nice friendly response. Then you prove conspiracy 101 - "attack the person who won't think the same as me...". I'm not here to fight, would love to see the cabal taken down. But every time I ask a question I either get banned or people like you start seething with anger. Im not American so don't understand everything with your politics. Hence why I don't see it as the big take down. Also, noone wants to answer - "do you really see the royal family being arrested?". Simple one. Just start with UK royal fanily, will they be arrested? Or....Q knew about and posted about corona and had to leave the crumbs small enough we would be safe from hurting the plan or ourselves, yet big enough to later in the future, prove that it was known (and countered) in the past. Co(mmense,ntinual,mmunity) Vid(eo surveillance) 19-AI 5g just makes it faster, the continual spying on us with our phones, this is already occuring. |
| Philly Special
User ID: 48696927 United States05/19/2020 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So has Q gone from bringing down the cabal to just investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78913558 All this thread has become is USA politics. I hope everything comes off. But Q isn't gonna take down the royal family... Ours, Dutch, Saudi.. Any of the cabal top players. It just isn't going to happen. Trump has been draining the swamp of lots of peados, that's amazing. Keep it up. But it's a pipe dream to think you'll take out the top of the chain. Epstein didn't kill himself. Noone gives a fuck anymore other than saying that comment. They do what they like. They kill and/or rape who they like. There's no way in my lifetime will I see the cabal taken down. Not the rothschilds, not the rockerfellers, the royal family or the Clinton. Obviously my opiniom, and this thread isn't keen on them. So after my ban I'll check in again in a few week. I still want the takedown, just really can't see it. Most of what people get excited over is tidbits or info that everyone turns into a mountain of imagination. Line looking at clouds and seeing animals. Sorry, but it's not going to happen. It's like waiting for flat earthers to reveal the edge. It is difficult to not be at least sympathetic to this poster's comments. It has felt to me in the last few months that the Q team has lost some of it's confidence and certainty. They really seemed to have been blind-sided by the virus. After the impeachment attempt failed, we were assured there would be no step five. Just as soon as we were given that assurance, step five was unfurled, in the form of the Coronavirus. Q was totally silent for awhile, and when they did started addressing it, it felt to me that the message turned a little to more of an expression of woe and consternation, and less of the "we have it all" and "we're in control". Anyhow, I do understand that the whole project is an incredibly massive undertaking and takes time. But it does seem to me that just one arrest (for now) of a major player would do wonders to restoring confidence that things of great import really are happening. Otherwise, surely a lot of people will become demoralized and give up hope - which would be a very dangerous thing going into a critical election. Thanks for your CONCERN, but.... It was actually not difficult at all to NOT feel sympathetic to the above poster. Their first sentence was a contradiction and totally wrong: "So has Q gone from bringing down the cabal to just investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam?" First of all "investigating Trumps Russia collusion scam" IS (in large part) "bringing down the cabal"!!!! Secondly, have you been reading ALL the recent Q posts???? So much fucking more being mentioned than "Trumps Russia collusion scam"!!! Oooh swear words. Tough guy. So what's new? If there's "so much fucking more being mentioned" why don't I see it in this thread? The first guy gave an nice friendly response. Then you prove conspiracy 101 - "attack the person who won't think the same as me...". I'm not here to fight, would love to see the cabal taken down. But every time I ask a question I either get banned or people like you start seething with anger. Im not American so don't understand everything with your politics. Hence why I don't see it as the big take down. Also, noone wants to answer - "do you really see the royal family being arrested?". Simple one. Just start with UK royal fanily, will they be arrested? Because nobody knows the answer to the question "do you really see the royal family being arrested?". A year ago I would have never guessed that a prince would leave the royal family in humiliation, yet here we are. However, there is a cycle that seems to happen quite often in conversation (online or IRL): person asks question, doesn't get answer they are looking for, attacks those whom the question was aksed, gets offended when they attack back, switches focus of conversation to being treated unfairly (i.e. claims of being banned), ends it with "I just wanted to ask a question" from some moral high ground. I would assume that most, if not all, on this thread have questioned Q internally. Problem is, you're asking the same question (basically) that has been answered thousands of times. People get tired of answering the same question over and over, especially when the person/people asking the question don't want to listen to the answers offered. The reality is that no one knows if Q is real or not. (to frame it properly, Q as an idea across the internet is very real, however whether there is actually a group of people associated with the POTUS who are all engaged in battle with the forces of evil trying to help us is a bit harder to nail down) There's no definitive answer to the question, because any answer is, at it's core, based on a belief. My answer is I don't know. But knowing what I have read and seen related to Q, the USA and the world at large leaves me with a choice: I can support the movement (through many direct or indirect means) or I can choose to ignore it (for whatever rationalized reason). That's it. That's the choice we are all left with. For where we are today, if you truly want to see the cabal brought down, then Q and the movement behind it is the ONLY reasonable path for that to happen. Seems to me, based on how you represent yourself, it deserves your support as well. If we're all just supporting and talking about a "designed to fail, controlled opposition" then your support (or lack thereof) is completely moot in the long run. Because if that's the case, then we are all proper fucked either way, and the NWO will install their one world gov't during our lifetime. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78929390  United Kingdom05/19/2020 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . The young bull. To the old bull. "Look at all those cows down there in the meadow, let's run down there and fuck one!" The old bull. To the young bull. "No. Let's stroll down there and fuck them all." If a pyramid has taken millennia to construct it wont be pulled over in a day. Or by knocking the capstone off. Patience truly is a virtue Padawan/Grasshopper/young bull. . |
| ChiaPet
User ID: 78834994 United States05/19/2020 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi all! I dropped off the radar on May1st. Was treated for conjunctivitis in both eyes at urgent care. Managed to lose nearly all my vision and was rushed to Las Vegas for eye surgery on May 7th. Glaucoma related - angular narrowing/closure, It’s been a slow recovery and I can see some and do see a little better each day. Lighting seems very dark right now BUT I CAN SEE AND AM SO THANKFUL! Another surgery to follow in Summer. Glad For o That lights up and I can stretch letters nice and big! Many touch screen commands are from guessing and rote. Lots of catching up to do-still on May 1 But I am happy! So veryThankful for many prayers sent my way! Beside the healing eyes, inner strength has been greatly enforced. Missed you all and this thread greatly. Thank you for your hard work.  ~ Matthew 7:16. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns or figs of thistles? ~ Don't worry, be Hopi. |
| ChiaPet
User ID: 78834994 United States05/19/2020 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882  Belgium05/19/2020 12:23 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 How about a nice game of chess. [link to thechessworld.com (secure)] Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:22 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78926166 United States05/19/2020 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Quoting: keybored How about a nice game of chess. [link to thechessworld.com (secure)] Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:22 Actually thats not how Chess is played. You dont try to pick off pawns and then minor peaces then the queen and leave the board empty with a king to check mate. Thats not how chess is played at all... |
| zzcat
User ID: 76873845 United States05/19/2020 12:39 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi all! I dropped off the radar on May1st. Was treated for conjunctivitis in both eyes at urgent care. Managed to lose nearly all my vision and was rushed to Las Vegas for eye surgery on May 7th. Glaucoma related - angular narrowing/closure, It’s been a slow recovery and I can see some and do see a little better each day. Lighting seems very dark right now BUT I CAN SEE AND AM SO THANKFUL! Another surgery to follow in Summer. Quoting: ChiaPet Glad For o That lights up and I can stretch letters nice and big! Many touch screen commands are from guessing and rote. Lots of catching up to do-still on May 1 But I am happy! So veryThankful for many prayers sent my way! Beside the healing eyes, inner strength has been greatly enforced. Missed you all and this thread greatly. Thank you for your hard work. So glad you are recovering. Hope next surgery goes great zzcat who says Schrodinger's cat is even in the box |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 POTUS daily ingest HCQ prevent COVID-19? Pre announcement: tools [source(s), data, COV-1 v COV-2 analysis, etc.] provided to factually ‘challenge’ narrative? Full attack v HCQ by media [D]s? Why? Why wouldn’t the media [D]s want to work [on all fronts] to find a possible solution [immediate dismissal]? Why doesn’t the media [D]s want the pandemic [rearrange: dem panic] to slow-stop? Why doesn’t the media [D]s want society to heal [recover]? Why doesn't the media [D]s want people to no longer fear going outside? Why doesn’t the media [D]s want people to point the finger at China as the source? Why does’t the media [D]s want people to return to work [normal daily lives]? Who benefits the most? Why does corp media [D] attempt to control us? Why does corp media [D] challenge [attack] anyone who defies pushed_coordinated narrative? Why does corp media [D] attempt to prevent [individual] critical thinking [public]? Is this about the virus or something else? Everything is at stake this election. Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:35 |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Quoting: keybored How about a nice game of chess. [link to thechessworld.com (secure)] Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:22 Actually thats not how Chess is played. You dont try to pick off pawns and then minor peaces then the queen and leave the board empty with a king to check mate. Thats not how chess is played at all... Chess is played in many different ways. It would be predictable and boring otherwise. Makes it so much easier when you can predict your opponents moves because the way they play is predictable though. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77285967  Bulgaria05/19/2020 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why wouldn’t the media [D]s... Quoting: keybored Why doesn’t the media [D]s... ...... Who benefits the most? Why does corp media [D]... Why does corp media [D]... Any reason or speculation why Q switches between media [D]s and corp media [D] Different meanings? Media [D]eep state vs corp media [D]emocrats? Or coincidence?  |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 When does your enemy expend ammunition? Do you expend ammunition against a weak opponent? Do you expend ammunition against a non_threat? Critical thinking _media cluster bomb(s) [attacks] v POTUS Critical thinking _media cluster bomb(s) [attacks] v Q [you] Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:44 |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi all! I dropped off the radar on May1st. Was treated for conjunctivitis in both eyes at urgent care. Managed to lose nearly all my vision and was rushed to Las Vegas for eye surgery on May 7th. Glaucoma related - angular narrowing/closure, It’s been a slow recovery and I can see some and do see a little better each day. Lighting seems very dark right now BUT I CAN SEE AND AM SO THANKFUL! Another surgery to follow in Summer. Quoting: ChiaPet Glad For o That lights up and I can stretch letters nice and big! Many touch screen commands are from guessing and rote. Lots of catching up to do-still on May 1 But I am happy! So veryThankful for many prayers sent my way! Beside the healing eyes, inner strength has been greatly enforced. Missed you all and this thread greatly. Thank you for your hard work. Welcome back ChiaPet. Glad that you are healing. Hope your full eyesight recovery is quick. Sending some healing prayers your way. |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why wouldn’t the media [D]s... Quoting: keybored Why doesn’t the media [D]s... ...... Who benefits the most? Why does corp media [D]... Why does corp media [D]... Any reason or speculation why Q switches between media [D]s and corp media [D] Different meanings? Media [D]eep state vs corp media [D]emocrats? Or coincidence? They're the same thing. Dem media employees and the owners of Dem media. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77049950 United States05/19/2020 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77049950 United States05/19/2020 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78926166 United States05/19/2020 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Quoting: keybored How about a nice game of chess. [link to thechessworld.com (secure)] Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:22 Actually thats not how Chess is played. You dont try to pick off pawns and then minor peaces then the queen and leave the board empty with a king to check mate. Thats not how chess is played at all... Chess is played in many different ways. It would be predictable and boring otherwise. Makes it so much easier when you can predict your opponents moves because the way they play is predictable though. Absolutely, and im not trying to be petty and attack Q for using chess as an analogy to explain their strategy in taking down the deep state using the process of law. BUT haha Chess is not played like that at all even at rudimentary levels. I maybe taking it a little personal because im a avid armature on Chess.com with a 1800+ rating. In law taking down the little guys and working your way up does sound like a rational strategy. |
| keybored
(OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium05/19/2020 01:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 [link to thehill.com (secure)] Infiltration not invasion. For future events. Q /qresearch/•Today at 19:04 |
| tahoe21
User ID: 64770153 United States05/19/2020 01:05 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Quoting: keybored How about a nice game of chess. [link to thechessworld.com (secure)] Objective [end]: checkmate king Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game? Do you attack and remove pawns first? Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next? Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end? Is the game being played public or private? Do emotions affect critical thinking? Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]? Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]? “At this time.” Q /qresearch/•Today at 18:22 Actually thats not how Chess is played. You dont try to pick off pawns and then minor peaces then the queen and leave the board empty with a king to check mate. Thats not how chess is played at all... It is if 'remove' is construed to mean 'remove, trap, or neutralize'. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77095408 Canada05/19/2020 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @RealJamesWoods Riddle me this: how do Republicans hold all the power yet can’t bring the criminals to justice, but Democrats push all these hoaxes through and hold hearings non-stop? Is there one single Republican with balls besides Trump? Just one? 12:58 PM · May 19, 2020 [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
| The Natural One
User ID: 78140957 United States05/19/2020 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anonymous 05/18/20 (Mon) 17:55:05060bf9 (5) No.9230671>>9230703 >>9230769 >>9230798 >>9230921 >>9230985 Quoting: anonFile (hide): a139f90711991fd⋯.jpeg (36.02 KB, 621x414, 3:2, E62344E8_68DE_47C1_8193_3….jpeg) (h) (u) 24 Navy Ships Went to the Shipyard for Repairs. Only 3 Made It Back to Sea on Time Were our ships sabotaged In the same time frame, work on six of 10 ships in Mayport was completed on schedule, and work on four of seven ships in San Diego was done on time, according to the report. The Navy calls time spent in the yards for repairs and maintenance "CNO availabilities," referring to the chief of naval operations. Anons what was that Whidbey island situation, this caught my attention? Wasn’t it 2017 The report cited an example of the dock landing ship Whidbey Island, which went in for repairs at the Norfolk yard on Aug. 21, 2017. The planned completion date was May 11, 2018, but the work was not completed until more than a year later on Dec. 18, 2019, it said In contrast to continuing schedule delays, the Navy has done much better on lowering costs through a new contracting procedure called the Multiple Award Contract-Multi Order (MAC-MO) approach for ship maintenance work, begun in 2015. Under MAC-MO, the Navy has increased competition opportunities, gained flexibility to ensure quality of work, and limited cost growth, the GAO said. [link to www.military.com (secure)] TRUST THE PLAN - Q |
| J.Crow
User ID: 41496127 United States05/19/2020 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 Quoting: keybored [link to thehill.com (secure)] Infiltration not invasion. For future events. Q /qresearch/•Today at 19:04 The phrase "Infiltration not invasion" is used by Kennedy in his famous anti cabal speech |
| hankie
Everything User ID: 77753356 United States05/19/2020 01:08 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: hankie The first person Lincoln arrested was not a prisoner of war, it was anyone who spoke out against what he was doing. People in the Union, not the Southern state who left the Union and became another country. It was people who were saying things he was doing that were really going against the constitution which he had already done during and before the South left the Union. He put those men in jail from the start of the war until almost the end of the war. I think people buy into the stories about Lincoln too much he was one of those pretty bad presidents even thou he had good points he caused some of the constitutional problems in the first place while he was not the president. Can you imagine what the people at that time though, don't speak or you will be arrested. They used to say he had a bad disease and was half insane at by the time of his second push in the civil war. I think that considering where he was from he had already been influenced by the progressive Republicans who had infiltrated the Republican party, those used to be called Illuminati which is communist. They came in claiming to abolitionist no, they got into the republican party that way, they did try to kick start the war with raid and murder in the south. This made the Southern states nervous thinking they were going to attack them, which was the plan. Lincoln did not write to him on famous speech. Washington was pretty much as history paints him, this is going by him writing everything he thought as said while he was president and he sure had some people around him that sure could cause headaches Hamilton being one and the others that didn't trust Hamilton. I even understand some of his stance about the Native Native in the south, I also understand why they didn't do as George Washington wanted them to do. They intermarried with the Spaniards, some of the leaders of those nations, one was a Spanish Baron, not just a native Chief. They had dealing with Spain and so they didn't see any difference they were not of the USA had little understanding of the New Government in Washington, the same problem Washington had, he didn't understand they just didn't see the US as he did. Big tangled history from our being and I understand Washington trying to keep the Union the New Republic from being destroy almost from the inception. Washington did the best job of any president in History, he keeps the country from falling apart at the time everyone was not agreeing with anyone else. He manages to keep it together. He was calmer than you would have thought. He had a very stable personality and you could tell it in his writing he didn't leave things out. Lincoln was a poor president next to Washington actually most were. When you find what was really going on during Lincoln's day and what he did before he was president and after is not what history teaches. Propaganda was going on then as well as now, he did want the old southern states back in, he was the reason they left, he pushed the tariffs on the southern states and would not try to remove them. The constitution said you could not charge tariffs between states that should be enough for people to understand Lincoln went against the constitution, his action with the other powers he gave himself, it was not by what he declared because nothing warrants it, there was no sedition the Southern state flat out left the Union and later set up another Union, not all joined them as in they vote for it, that is why they left Alabama. You had people wanting more than just getting a country made in the south, some wanted the western state for themselves. We have always had black-hearted people some not so wonderful as written about yet they were fooled about others too. The only thing I can say Lincoln was not in it alone, he was not so nice of a guy either, he had his good points, that is about all there is for Lincoln. I found this history in archives from the time so, surprise lies are always been told seems. Go do some digging on this, and don't start during his presidential years. Here we go again. You assume you know something I dont and tell me to go do some digging on him. You also assume that we would see the same attributes or history the same and agree when likely we would not. Lincoln was a load mouth who would give Trump a run on Twitter if he was alive today. He won and then he died and his history is not relevant today outside the statutes he made in governance. I bring him up as it had relevance in regards to war time law. I don't assume crap, you do jump at shit thou you? could say something like this, I learned this too thank you, you kind of jump at nothing important, take some calm yourself down. Did you get the part about Washington? I know this one maybe you have read that rare book. Don't assume I know what you think or don't think, I don't think one thing about your mind or if you know or don't know, nor do I go out of my way to plow your brain. You put the thing there it doesn't explain that what he did was more than just what he did, he went against the constitution. He started with others before the war when he was in congress. This is why I don't list him in with the best, in fact there are many good ones, I can say George Washington was a one that field his history correctly. Are you always with no name, I do not look at numbers. I don't know mine. I not targeting you for anything I never have, if I say anything they have problem and it could be them, then get huffy, I never have, I not only forgive things I really think it best never to get huffy in the first place. There is one way you can make me made, that is thinking or saying having sex with any child in normal or Ok. I would lose my cool with sex perverts. I not good to worry about people who can't control themselves. Don't everything I, think you are stupid, never crossed my mind, it just shares information as in conversation, go dig it up that for anyone who reads it. I glad you know the repeated history is mostly propaganda. I do not go after people if I look at both sides, it not out to insult people. I look at things this way, I don't know who you are. I now know you seem to have problems with people, think, or me in particular about what you know or don't know, which makes no sense to me. Do not look me thinking I would deliberately attack something about your brain collection. Since you think I did, beg your pardon sir. Its the part when you tell someone to go do something that sounds pretentious. You making claims without sources then putting on others to go prove you right, thats not reasonable. You are also very wordy. Let me try to clean up what I think your thoughts are. We were posting about War time law and constitutional protections during war time. I bring up Lincolns statutes and you made the observation that Lincoln was violating constitutional protections before the war begin and made a statement that those actions make you dislike him. I dont know if Lincolns action prewar invalidate his legal actions during the war if that were to be the case. I do know that your claims are not legal documents or documented legally while Lincolns suspension of habeas corpus is. He pushed the tariffs that started the war while in congress. He had no justification to start a war, the states were no longer state of the Union, they were another country recognized by the countries of the world as a separate country. The south stated did what the constitution said if a country went against them and were found too oppressive they could throw off them and create a new government. Those tariffs were asked to be removed, it was causing big hardship in the Southern states, that is why he broke the constitution, it started in congress the only congress can write tax laws, The south did not have industries as the north did, they had commodities, sugar, cotton, tobacco, corn and a few others, they did not have the steel or iron at that time, they didn't have mills to make cloth, etc. He knew that tariffs between states were unconstitutional and by putting up he was breaking the constitution, it caused a large burden on the southern states and he wouldn't end it. He caused the dang problem. It was not about slaves, slavery would have ended, it was not economical for most, a lot of mouths to feed, there was educating these slaves, who would have been able to take care of themselves. So, it was them needing more money and the southern people had to be hit, they were not rich as some think it took a lot to even float a lot of the time. They raised most of their own food. One bad year could wipe you out. This was why the war started, he broke the law for pushing the tariffs and not revisiting it, he broke the Bill of Rights also, there was not anyone coming against the Northern Union, there were not southern states at the time of the start of the war. It was the Confederate State of America another Country. Not just the Southern States, that is the difference of Southern against the Northern States, there was no Southern state as it had been. Lincoln messed up, so he set out to get the southern states, a then nonentity, they were a separate country. You can't force another country to return to you. So, it was an illegal war. He first put the one telling him it was wrong in jail, this was people from the United State not the South. It had become a tangled mess. There were other states wanting to leave the Union because of more than what Lincoln did, there were other problems and pushing the tariffs was not good nor setting up an attack to start the war. I don't think there would have ever been the Confederate States of America if they had not sent people to put it into being. Jefferson Davis was from the war college and Johnson was a monster from the Senate, they came with this Confederate States plan, they were not from Alabama where they set up their plan, Alabama didn't sign onto it one man with not rights did, not the same. Alabama was a republic, they left right after this and went to their set up capital in South Carolina. The set of it was about a fort and it had to do with stopping another state from leaving the United State to join with the New Confederate States of America another country sovereign country. The United States gov. didn't have the rights to stop states from leaving, their power only came from the governed. In other words, Lincoln the congressman thought up a way to bring in Tax money, the South and their states were the one who had tariffs unconstitutional betweens states, which they asked to have removed well they didn't and the south was bleeding their resources which it had to pay for in the industrial north. They were hurting personally from the amount of money the tariff cut into their resources to by needed things in the south. Clothes and other things only made in the northern states. This is the only reason the confederate states lost, they didn't have mills and industries. Of course, they are going to get mad and they did. If you go to the constitution and read the part about no tariffs between state, Lincoln pushed this in the congress he put it up and others thought it was a bright idea, some bright idea not. I can not understand Lincoln without putting there was something wrong with him in the mix mentally wrong. There is a lot about the war one being the congress is involved and they can not tax the people pay except two years in a war. lincoln intentions were to make the states who left rejoin the Union he messed up, one problem they were no longer state and by that time, of course, A guy name Davis and this sidekick Johnston or Johnson had been sent to the south one from the war college the other the senate to state the Confederate States of America and then the war, it just doesn't ring right, either Lincoln sent them or the one who had been planning this move from the time of Jackson was. Regardless it was not little children's state to be made to come back to daddy the Union and him as one to punish them if they didn't. They were independent counties not states as they had been, then they became The Confederate States of America the country. By the time he planned the war none of what he did was anything except a conspiracy by the executive branch of the gov. Remember this Davis war college absentee owner of some plantation in a state I don't remember which his brother ran it. Johnson or similar name was a monster he was one of those people who thought blacks were not human, this was a US senator we had the same type who thought Native American was not human, the only part is no they were were not human they were part of mankind God created. Not only was that one bad he thought all he had to do was go back and his senate seat was his. To bad his state did not return to the union by the time he would have to have been seated. No, he did worse he went and got the governorship in Georgia. Davis never signed to end the war never did, the only person who did was a general that was Robert E, Lee, and Robert E. Lee who did not own slaves and he went back to where he left the American military college, so both Davis and Robert E. Lee were from the war college. It was during that war that Davis changed somehow and told the Blacks if they fought in the war they would win their freedom, they did fight for the confederacy which most don't want to know. There were so many ends and out during that time it not funny. The north did not want to fight the south because they left and then became a new country this was why they got locked up against their will breaking no laws, just saying you are against something is not sedition, Lincoln gave himself power he didn't have any reasons for. It would be interesting to see who he said he was declaring war on, it wasn't just wayward states they didn't exist by that time. They didn't exist before that time, they were like I said no longer part of the Union which were together, they became another country independent of another country except themselves, Alabama was a Republic and George Washington was their first president. His picture was part of their government and the idea of freedom so the confederation document was always part of the Alabama constitution from their start and it never changes the Alabama people vote for what happens, and they didn't vote to join the Confederate state of America nor to rejoin the Union as demanded, it had to vote on by the people or the people would have come after the ones who dared to do so without the vote. It was done later not because it was demanded it was because it was the right thing to do. So, that another crazy part of the whole dang thing, Mississippi passed that law, Alabama didn't so they thought we would, so they put us in as a state without or doing and dang thing. This last had nothing to do with Lincoln. If a humorous part of the reentering the union or did we. We maybe the last Republic in America. Sorry I got a headache These are the times that tries men's and women's souls! May we come though it victorious! |
| sinceBeforeQhadaName
User ID: 75561499 United States05/19/2020 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77049950 United States05/19/2020 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  [link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)] Phone Calls Between Biden And Ukraine's Poroshenko Leaked; Details $1 Billion "Quid Pro Quo" To Fire Burisma Prosecutor |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78929390 United Kingdom05/19/2020 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The hits just keep rolling in for Biden.... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77049950 [link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)] Phone Calls Between Biden And Ukraine's Poroshenko Leaked; Details $1 Billion "Quid Pro Quo" To Fire Burisma Prosecutor . Of interest: the scum he was bragging to at CFR and their collective response. Human scum. . |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77095408 Canada05/19/2020 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Patriot4America🇺🇲Medium starMedium starMedium star🇺🇲 @patriot4q Even a child can be taught to Checkmate in 3 moves. These people are stupid. Keep your Eyes on the King, thats the whole point of the Game. #QAnon #WWG1WGA #WWG1WGAWORLDWIDE 1:14 PM · May 19, 2020 [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 39834772 United States05/19/2020 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | James Woods Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77095408 @RealJamesWoods Riddle me this: how do Republicans hold all the power yet can’t bring the criminals to justice, but Democrats push all these hoaxes through and hold hearings non-stop? Is there one single Republican with balls besides Trump? Just one? 12:58 PM · May 19, 2020 [link to twitter.com (secure)] The answer is no, not a one... wait, except the hero from Kentucky Thomas Massie |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77095408 Canada05/19/2020 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In listening to all these doctors on fox, sorry don't remember who had them on, and they were on after cavuto's meltdown. the doctor said "there have been cases in the white house and a chance it's in the airconditioning system so I would take it too". Both doctors in the segment said they would take it too. That was the most logical explanatioin I've heard. But, it also makes me wonder because the WH managed to avoid the virus for so long in the thick of it and now it comes to the wh? And I wondered how the doctor knew it was in the air conditoning system. |
