QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii

I love everyone's post, but can we stay on topic and not attacking each other.

Cool thanks!

Thanks, I may do that at some point. My current choice for reading has been the Wes Penre papers, when I have time. It is interesting to follow another researchers take on their quest for truth, especially when it covers so many various topics. It looks like it is going to be the quite the long read and so far I feel like there are many interesting concepts to consider. If I am not mistaken, the over point of his papers is that he has concluded that our continued existence on this planet is due to 'soul traps'. It will be interesting following his research to see how he came about this conclusion, which of course others have as well.

Coming back to the original thread and your personal perspective of it assuming you have read them both fully, what exactly do you think I would gain by reading the original thread? Could you be a little more specific so that the prospect of reading it is a little more enticing? At this point, not being on the Q train as much as I once was, what would be the point? Do you feel by me reading the first thread I would change to once again supporting the Q narrative? Will the answer to my question as to whether or not the Q movement could be the platform from which an AC like figure might emerge be found in the first thread?

I would appreciate any additional information you would care to share as to why you think the first thread would be of benefit to me, thank you.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 10/05/2021 10:25 AM

Mornin' great popcorn slayer...lol. cool vid btw. I watched it several times.

My comment is a question.... Are these people so stupid as to think that resigning their office will get them out of this jam? Or do they think there will be enough of them left to save their sorry asses?

Or are they beyond thinking by now and simply into flight/fight mode?

The psychology of all this seemingly willful ignorance leaves me pretty much just shaking mfh.

It is crazy the lengths the adversary will go to to invert everything and how so many people can be taken in by it.

Thanks

Context.

This ain't all about Q.

Q is about what's unfolding before our eyes, in the now.


Sidebar: I wrote you a sentence; you replied 2 paragraphs. Dude, chill.

That amplification and consumption is quickly tiring to most people, dare I speak for more than myself.

I'd suggest to you, to practice being FAR less wordy. As it tends to appear narcissistic.

Try and fit the culture that's already here, and being participated in by thousands more lurkers beyond just those you see pinging. And they, have been here, or backtracked to acquire the context from Day One, on the seminal thread.

Study the culture you wish to engage. Or engage the culture you wish to study.

Why exactly do I trigger you so? Do you think it is more than possible it is you and not me that actually has the problem? If someone is going to suggest something to me, do I not have the right to ask more questions, specifically why it may be beneficial for me?

I honestly do not understand the hate I get from some of you folks.

Bump for future reference.

Our son is a conservative libertarian, but he is absolutely online with all of the BS related to COVID. I sent him the link to the Desert News, and his reply was "why do you rely on unknown small town papers rather than established science?" I have asked him if he even read any of the papers referenced in the article, and then added the link to the Hindu Times. It is very disheartening. Quilts and I have concluded that we need to pray that he is not able to find another job in silicon valley and that he needs to move out of California.

You complain that I use two paragraphs to communicate by using eight yourself. I notice you did not answer how you feel the first thread might benefit me, only that I should conform. How is this sort of culture any different than what we currently have, right now in the world where everyone is being forced to conform?

*edit - you did answer my question, my apologies. So you are saying the first thread has context and this thread does not? Are the two threads divergent in context? I agree, this thread is not all about Q, I find it interesting that I get attacked for diverging from the group think as to what is proper and what is not. Rules for thee but not for me sort of vibe.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 10/05/2021 10:52 AM

Good luck doing that with me. I walk around and people have to tell me my pocket's ringing. Too many guns and loud music in my past!

I suppose I'd wind up before a firing squad for that infraction.

Whistle-blower is just there at marks behest. I see it. She's trying to expose the truth at the same time beg for leniency with choice words. She's a diffuser.

I totally agree. I didn't pick my avatar just for the personality shown. I have red hair and a wild beard just like Yosemite Sam! Our daughter also has the bright red hair.

I miss 630. Anyone else?

And did you ever check out Billy Janey and Truth in Vegas on Utub?

Y'all talking about great guitarists... thought of Billy again.

Let me know what you think.

I am sorry, is this the same whistle blower that was on 60 minutes? The name rang a bell and that is why I responded the way I did. When I watched the 60m interview, the whistle blower was calling out facebook from softening up of their fascist ways because she lost a friend to conspiracy theories, or some such non sense.

I am unsure now if these two are the same, I am thinking they are. What truth do you see her exposing if she is there on Marks behest? I can see her as a diffuser for sure.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 10/05/2021 11:00 AM

You are like a little precocious child who will not shut the F up and you fail, or pretend to fail to understand... and then act like that's our fault. And like we do with children... we have tolerated you and continued to do so for quite a while now. But It looks to me like that time is ending.

Time to re=enter you chrysalis and come back with a new name/avatar. And start all over again.

Buh BYE!

Same exact one. This is currently live. I posted the vid.

Sub-house committee going on right now.

Last Edited by Alvect on 10/05/2021 11:02 AM

/nod I edited my post. I am not sure I can stomach watching her after having watched the 60m interview. More bread and circuses.

The rosenblaum (sp?) Exchange was telling. Rewind about 15-20 mins.

https://twitter.com/_/status/1445386848340217865

here:

[link to thenationalpulse.com (secure)]

Have they mandated the vax? Or refused the vax mandate? Trying to determine which fbi is there.

Last Edited by Alvect on 10/05/2021 11:12 AM

The current state of our Universities/Colleges

https://twitter.com/_/status/1445351433138810880

Ill ask you the same, why do I trigger you so much that you feel the need to resort to bullying? I can understand why my current take on Q might be a threat to you, you have so much invested in being on the right side of history. I look at it like this, by questioning the Q narrative, they do encourage us to think for ourselves after all, I am able to consider all possibilities. If these questions lead me to a conclusion that I am uncomfortable with, isnt it better that I actually come to that conclusion than not? Wouldnt it actually be better to be wrong than right in this instance and therefor having come to the conclusion, I win because I am perceiving potential deception and can act accordingly or if I am wrong I still win because good will actually be triumphing over evil.

I am stumped as to why some of you are not seeing this and why my questioning and perspectives are such a bad thing.

“Pandora Papers”: The Left-Wing Media are a Tool for Soros and They’re Too Dumb to Notice

The Washington Post, the Guardian and 150 other news outlets have obtained access to 11.9 million “confidential files” on offshore bank accounts and companies in 200 countries, melodramatically dubbed “the Pandora Papers”, the next in a series of illegal hacks released to damage certain companies and high-profile figures after the “Panama Papers” and “Paradise Papers”, among others.

Once again, the entire operation is a carefully coordinated media campaign waged for shady purposes by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), an NGO founded and funded by George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (2017: $400,000; 2018: $1.5 million; 2019: $25,000).

moar: [link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]

Kek

https://twitter.com/_/status/1445388006492418049

Blumenthal?