Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,132 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 596,973
Pageviews Today: 962,385Threads Today: 386Posts Today: 6,322
10:11 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii
Poster Handle Bluebird1
Post Content
:newq:

3858
New: Title TBD
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
12 Feb 2020 - 11:04:32 AM

GA2.21.jpg [link to imgur.com (secure)]

[Re_drop]
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
 Quoting: The Natural One


I understand what Q is expressing except for his last sentence. Since when have we ever had a Constitutional Republic? A Constitutional Republic must be established and KNOWN by the people. Currently our Courts have the flag with the yellow fringe and capped with what is said to be a Phoenix. I have read that it means that you are entering a foreign enclave. The Courts go by Admiralty-Maritime Laws of the sea and my understanding is that we should have Constitutional Law and Laws of the Land. Also, if we were to adhere to the Original Constitution such as the Thirteenth Amendment that does NOT ALLOW TITLES OF NOBILITY WITHIN OUR GOV'T. That means that no members of the BAR are allowed within our Gov't.

We cannot have a Constitutional Republic when our justice system and our Gov't clearly need cleaning out. Q makes it sound as if we have a Constitutional Republic and a statement like that certainly is confusing for me. Is he telling us that something has changed?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP