Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,162 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 264,096
Pageviews Today: 335,132Threads Today: 64Posts Today: 1,048
02:57 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii
Poster Handle hankie
Post Content
...


For starters...The vast majority here don't "fully" trust anyone that we don't know personally. Including Trump, Q team, everyone on this thread. We do respect some opinions more than others.

Secondly, if you were in the battle of Good vs, Evil, would you publically announce your strategy and plans to defeat your enemy for all (including your enemy) to hear?

People like yourself come out of the woodwork every time someone, a perceived WH, says anything counter to what they interpreted from a Q post.

You say we need to wake up for trusting Q. And it appears you are trusting what Barr, Sara Carter, and Alan Dershowitz "said".

Most here are just trying to put the puzzle together with the help of the tea leaves dropped by Q (reading between the lines) and literally thousands of others. Understanding what Q is...PART of an overall strategy. Q is not the end all, be all. It's just a PART. Some of which IS likely some strategic deception. As would and should be expected.

In my life, I've learned to not trust words much...as the saying goes "actions speak louder than words".
 Quoting: Clair_Voyant



Here we go again with the "you come out of wood work"

Or "lurk more until you know as much as me"

dont be silly

None of you have followed Q closer then myself, you dont understand Q or geopolitics, military operation or constitutional law more then me. You have a bigger will to fit in then I do, congratulation.

This happens repeatedly here with you guys. You dont speak about the topic or make your case. You attack the anon you dont know anything about while pretentiously act like you know something the anon does not without making a point.

To the point TNO is trying to make that Q has at least implied that their is a secret military investigation ongoing. He has not. Q has implied that we are at a state of war ever sense 911 and during war the constitution can be suspended and Military law supersedes. Kavanaugh spoke about Law of Armed Conflict and said he believed american citizens who collaborate with the enemy can be considered enemy combatants and not be protected by the US constitution.

None of that is saying there is some secret military investigation.

let me add this as its pertinent. Congressional suspension of habeas corpus. That bill, the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act, was signed into law March 3, 1863. Lincoln exercised his powers under it in September, suspending habeas corpus throughout the Union in any case involving prisoners of war, spies, traitors, or military personnel.

Q has also implied the use of the national guard while a state is under a state of emergency. Currently all states are in a active state of emergency.

Q has implied many things and many things have not happened. Just because things Q implies are theoretically feasible does not mean they are happening. Q has implied many dates for example that turned out to be nothing. Q has implied who we should trust and what to look out for only to become considered miss information later on.

We have to be much more critical of Q, why not?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78926166


The first person Lincoln arrested was not a prisoner of war, it was anyone who spoke out against what he was doing. People in the Union, not the Southern state who left the Union and became another country. It was people who were saying things he was doing that were really going against the constitution which he had already done during and before the South left the Union. He put those men in jail from the start of the war until almost the end of the war. I think people buy into the stories about Lincoln too much he was one of those pretty bad presidents even thou he had good points he caused some of the constitutional problems in the first place while he was not the president. Can you imagine what the people at that time though, don't speak or you will be arrested. They used to say he had a bad disease and was half insane at by the time of his second push in the civil war. I think that considering where he was from he had already been influenced by the progressive Republicans who had infiltrated the Republican party, those used to be called Illuminati which is communist. They came in claiming to abolitionist no, they got into the republican party that way, they did try to kick start the war with raid and murder in the south. This made the Southern states nervous thinking they were going to attack them, which was the plan.

Lincoln did not write to him on famous speech. Washington was pretty much as history paints him, this is going by him writing everything he thought as said while he was president and he sure had some people around him that sure could cause headaches Hamilton being one and the others that didn't trust Hamilton. I even understand some of his stance about the Native Native in the south, I also understand why they didn't do as George Washington wanted them to do. They intermarried with the Spaniards, some of the leaders of those nations, one was a Spanish Baron, not just a native Chief. They had dealing with Spain and so they didn't see any difference they were not of the USA had little understanding of the New Government in Washington, the same problem Washington had, he didn't understand they just didn't see the US as he did. Big tangled history from our being and I understand Washington trying to keep the Union the New Republic from being destroy almost from the inception. Washington did the best job of any president in History, he keeps the country from falling apart at the time everyone was not agreeing with anyone else. He manages to keep it together. He was calmer than you would have thought.
He had a very stable personality and you could tell it in his writing he didn't leave things out.

Lincoln was a poor president next to Washington actually most were. When you find what was really going on during Lincoln's day and what he did before he was president and after is not what history teaches. Propaganda was going on then as well as now, he did want the old southern states back in, he was the reason they left, he pushed the tariffs on the southern states and would not try to remove them. The constitution said you could not charge tariffs between states that should be enough for people to understand Lincoln went against the constitution, his action with the other powers he gave himself, it was not by what he declared because nothing warrants it, there was no sedition the Southern state flat out left the Union and later set up another Union, not all joined them as in they vote for it, that is why they left Alabama. You had people wanting more than just getting a country made in the south, some wanted the western state for themselves. We have always had black-hearted people some not so wonderful as written about yet they were fooled about others too. The only thing I can say Lincoln was not in it alone, he was not so nice of a guy either, he had his good points, that is about all there is for Lincoln. I found this history in archives from the time so, surprise lies are always been told seems.

Go do some digging on this, and don't start during his presidential years.
 Quoting: hankie


Here we go again. You assume you know something I dont and tell me to go do some digging on him. You also assume that we would see the same attributes or history the same and agree when likely we would not.

Lincoln was a load mouth who would give Trump a run on Twitter if he was alive today. He won and then he died and his history is not relevant today outside the statutes he made in governance. I bring him up as it had relevance in regards to war time law.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78926166


I don't assume crap, you do jump at shit thou you? could say something like this, I learned this too thank you, you kind of jump at nothing important, take some calm yourself down. Did you get the part about Washington? I know this one maybe you have read that rare book. Don't assume I know what you think or don't think, I don't think one thing about your mind or if you know or don't know, nor do I go out of my way to plow your brain. You put the thing there it doesn't explain that what he did was more than just what he did, he went against the constitution. He started with others before the war when he was in congress. This is why I don't list him in with the best, in fact there are many good ones, I can say George Washington was a one that field his history correctly.

Are you always with no name, I do not look at numbers. I don't know mine. I not targeting you for anything I never have, if I say anything they have problem and it could be them, then get huffy, I never have, I not only forgive things I really think it best never to get huffy in the first place. There is one way you can make me made, that is thinking or saying having sex with any child in normal or Ok. I would lose my cool with sex perverts. I not good to worry about people who can't control themselves.

Don't everything I, think you are stupid, never crossed my mind, it just shares information as in conversation, go dig it up that for anyone who reads it. I glad you know the repeated history is mostly propaganda. I do not go after people if I look at both sides, it not out to insult people. I look at things this way, I don't know who you are. I now know you seem to have problems with people, think, or me in particular about what you know or don't know, which makes no sense to me. Do not look me thinking I would deliberately
attack something about your brain collection.

Since you think I did, beg your pardon sir.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP