|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Deplorable NO MORE Michele B |
|
Post Content
|
https://imgur.com/a/ALD2d7Y An Anons thoughts.... "Just some thinking I have been doing. We are in a silent war now. (Running RED?) The D’s fired an early October Surprise with the Bob Woodward Bombshell book trying to keep focus on Trump’s supposed Coronavirus failure. Trump implied Woodward was a highly over-rated has-been. In response to their surprise hit, which actually misses, Trump responds with his surprise…announcing the Death of RBG, another highly over rated has-been. And…who released the notice of her death? The SC did. Roberts in is charge of the SC, so one could assume that Chief Justice John Roberts (btw, Lin Wood has been hitting Roberts hard lately..hmm) is in charge and would have approved the release. Does this mean Roberts is now under White hat control? I think so. That means Trump hit back twice as hard. Maybe three times as hard. Not only did he take-out RBG, figuratively speaking, of course, but he also took the virus off the no. 1 spot while showing the deep state that Roberts is under his control now. All of this happened while we were ‘rigged for red’. But now that we are running red, I assume this tit for tat scenario will be happening at a faster and at higher stakes. Q (White Hats) have THEIR playbook. Do they know everything that will come our way? Maybe, maybe not. But Q team is prepared and will respond with missiles that strike 1000 times worse, as Trump just implied, he would do with Iran if they struck us. So, Buckle Up! It’s going to be a barrage of surprise attacks going both ways, with each one increasing in severity. I believe that RBG was a total shock to them. Whether she was already dead or not, they thought they controlled the timing and Roberts. Neither is true and they didn’t like it. It is possible that the "hunt for Red October' may be when their 'biggest missile' is turned back against them." ABC News Retweeted ABC News Politics @ABCPolitics LATEST: Sen. Lisa Murkowski confirms that she will not support taking up a Supreme Court vacancy ahead of the election, citing her opposition to the 2016 Merrick Garland nomination: "... the same standard must apply."
Sen. Susan Collins shares her view. [link to abcn.ws (secure)] 12:29 PM · Sep 20, 2020 [ link to twitter.com (secure)] Responding to AC77359769, based on above quote by AC 75561499: I wouldn't be surprised to see some DEMS "turn" on their party and vote for confirmation of POTUS' SC pick.....meaning: THEY are trying to save their own necks - knowing what WH's have on them, and what it will mean if they don't play along. There's going to be a lot of switching and twisting and surprises from people one would never expect, based on Q's assertion that WH's "have it all," and many, many are headed for Gitmo (or worse).
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
