Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,370 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 528,022
Pageviews Today: 677,652Threads Today: 194Posts Today: 2,361
05:58 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject QAnon: It's on, don't panic ii
Poster Handle hankie
Post Content
No on replies or answers my question yesterday regarding leviticus 25(5:5) 44:49. Its biblical, it is the verses in Torah that allows slavery, Male abs female, who they may be purchased from and that they are inheritable property, FOREVER.
it speaks about which group of slaves are redeemable...and this us my question, putting personal and religious beliefs aside, and going on the premise that the Torah is a true legal document, a valid contract, binding and called a covenant between God and the people...if only certain group of slaves aew able to be redeemed and freed from slavery, is the document also saying that whatever group isn't in the redeemable group are...irredeemable?
Property, slaves, forever...thus sounds like irredeemable and a set up for a group of people selling people for meat or organs or sex traffic and its allowable, because we are all just irredeemable slaves?
Please help on this one, I travelled thousands of miles last year, gave away everything I owned and went to convert to a certain group, and it's a crisis in my heart right now because I have never known a time where I did not know this book to be holy, but I am so sad at reading this. Is this all the evil that Babylon has done? Is this the harlotry? Did someone change the words, someone babylonians secret religion, and changed the words, to make acts their lover idol desires seem holy or allowed?
I am alone, scared, living in the basement of a person's house I met online, and seemed happy with my desire to convert.

This above ties into . ..in the Torah isaac, called Yitzhak-laughter, yet Yissac,means "it bites"...why do they add a t to his bon t containing name?
Laughter is good, normally.
There is a kind of laughter that stings, gets under the skin, scornful laughter " it bites".
Isaac married rebecca's, who chose to go with a stranger to marry an older man.
Torah has her watering camels with sheep, old enough to do these things.
Some group think she was young, 12 or 13 young. Imagine these conversations.
Some smaller group think she was 3.a baby!!!
These groups arguing age of a bride for thousands of years?
3,13... if the arguments were televised would either age come across as allowable under Torah? How would the public react to this?

And another...Jacob deceived his father, stole from his brother, fled home, didn't return to bury his mother...and to buy the birthright, sod. Sod is weird biblical word, most people think sod means boil, he boiled the beans..but the name of human nan, and human blood is inside the word for lentil. What TF was he boiling, that the hunter fainting from dawn would give his birthright for?
Sod also means demons.
He put a spell on the very thing that a vampire needs to survive.


Adam/eve serpent. Serpent nachash, also means the hissing whisper of an enchanter. The serpent beguiled eve, enchanted is another term.
Eve calls cain, son begotten by god!
Cain is not listed as Adam's line. Dam means blood, madam, would mean people of blood. Blood because it runs through our veins, or people of blood because they ate blood.
Cainibaal. So biblically this war starts here, first murder?
Sarah, a 90 year old woman is told she is to have a baby, and in genesis 20 when she laughs, she becomes young again, I mean she was kidnapped at 65 and again at 90....she must have looked younger than her age, this group discusses that too.


According to this interpretation, immediately upon the declaration by the visiting angels that Sarah would have a child, her skin became smooth and she miraculously returned to her youthful figure. This is why she laughed and this is what she expressed by saying, “how can it be that a wrinkly old woman now has smooth and delicate skin?”

The great medieval commentator, Ramban, adopted this approach as well (Gen. 20:2).


Its biblical.
 Quoting: FrankveryFrank


There is a lot of things in the bible God did say was right, they were also taking wives, not just one, that was because they were weak. Jesus told them they should have only one wife, because more divide them. He made Adam one wife called a help mate, he didn't make more for him. Man is the cause of something's in the Old Testament one being the sacrificial offering, after a while it stunk to him because they did it, not because they cared for him, it was more of an automatic thing similar to a chore. Man had already been keeping slaves, just because it was allowed does not mean God intended for it to continue. Jesus said, there is no difference in believers free or slave, if the master is a believer he will treat them well. Man wrote in rules, it was for themselves at their point in history.

You know a lot of those slaves were light skinned people. The Romans had white slaves, they even made them into soldiers. There were debt slaves that were only slaves for seven years and no more. This is why Jesus said, don't own another man in a debt, or he would own you, don't do it. If you go into many of the places in the bible, you will find a lot of people were taken as slaves from war. Do you think we should gather our enemies and make the slaves now? There was a few time the people in that group in the bible were taken slaves, a good thing they sometimes took in their existence to call on the Lord. They were slaves a long time.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP