Islam Was CREATED By The catholic church | |
Servant-of-the-LORD
User ID: 79066404 United States 06/23/2020 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a bit of history and a "theory" ?!? Quoting: Servant-of-the-LORD The filioque was added to the Nicene Creed at the Council of Toledo in 589. It was basically the FULL beginning of the "God the Son" trinity. [link to episcopalchurch.org (secure)] Guess what Christian "teaching" is MOST despised by Muslims? The "trinity". Ironic too that Islam was started just a few decades AFTER the Council of Trent made the filioque change. What are the odds that Father God actually SENT Gabriel to Muhammed to keep the "Jesus is God" nonsense in check? Meaning, possibly that Jesus (Joshua, with a "y" in Hebrew) was just this )ewish guy who maybe was a healer, maybe a bit psychic and knew things, tried to organize his )ewish people to uprise against the filthy beastly pagan roman occupiers of his country, had a following, prayed to God for help, got sent to the gallows by the romans but his following of )ews wouldn't let up so the romans set up a false religion in his name, insisting that the )ews must "turn the other cheek" and not attack them, then setting up a false codex with many different conflicting stories about this fake prophet's life, that millions of christians follow today and totally blame the )ews for his death (see hitler @ oberrmmergau "passion play," 1934, reason for the slaughter of 6 million out of 8 million european )ews, WWII) and the story of idiotic human-god worship continues. Nope. I don't buy that garbage. The Romans didn't "create" a religion. Manuscript fragments of the New Testament date back to the late First Century AD. There's more ancient manuscript evidence for Jesus than ANY other ancient person. You blabber of "the lack of contemporary evidence" knowing FULL WELL that.... 1. Starting after Jesus' death, the Pharisees did everything possible to derail the growth of Christianity. AND the Romans spent the 250+ years between Christ's death and Contantine's "vision" KILLING Christians. 2. Manuscripts, at the least, have lasted through... -the Roman destruction of Israel & other wars in the Middle East of the 1st / 2nd Century -the 250+ years of Roman persecution of Christians and Hebrews that began with Nero -the "trinitarian" changes made to the Bible beginning around Tertullian's time -the invasions / expansion of Islam that began after Muhammad's death in 632 AD Folks expect that Jesus' miracles to be recorded in a pile of ancient tabloid journals somewhere? Even the Christ-hating Pharisees mention Jesus in the Talmud. Even IF we didn't have manuscript fragments dating back to the 1st century, scholars could "piece together" the 4 Gospels just from the writings of various church fathers. ---AD 96 Clement Bishop of Rome quotes / refers to 11 books used for the New Testament including Matthew, Mark and Luke. ---AD 108 Ignatius Bishop of Antioch quotes / refers to 24 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. ---AD 110 Polycarp Bishop of Smyrna quotes / refers to 18 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. On TOP of that, there is a growing consensus that the first writings of the Gospels were in Hebrew & Aramaic. I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67437617 United States 06/24/2020 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a bit of history and a "theory" ?!? Quoting: Servant-of-the-LORD The filioque was added to the Nicene Creed at the Council of Toledo in 589. It was basically the FULL beginning of the "God the Son" trinity. [link to episcopalchurch.org (secure)] Guess what Christian "teaching" is MOST despised by Muslims? The "trinity". Ironic too that Islam was started just a few decades AFTER the Council of Trent made the filioque change. What are the odds that Father God actually SENT Gabriel to Muhammed to keep the "Jesus is God" nonsense in check? Meaning, possibly that Jesus (Joshua, with a "y" in Hebrew) was just this )ewish guy who maybe was a healer, maybe a bit psychic and knew things, tried to organize his )ewish people to uprise against the filthy beastly pagan roman occupiers of his country, had a following, prayed to God for help, got sent to the gallows by the romans but his following of )ews wouldn't let up so the romans set up a false religion in his name, insisting that the )ews must "turn the other cheek" and not attack them, then setting up a false codex with many different conflicting stories about this fake prophet's life, that millions of christians follow today and totally blame the )ews for his death (see hitler @ oberrmmergau "passion play," 1934, reason for the slaughter of 6 million out of 8 million european )ews, WWII) and the story of idiotic human-god worship continues. Nope. I don't buy that garbage. The Romans didn't "create" a religion. Manuscript fragments of the New Testament date back to the late First Century AD. There's more ancient manuscript evidence for Jesus than ANY other ancient person. You blabber of "the lack of contemporary evidence" knowing FULL WELL that.... 1. Starting after Jesus' death, the Pharisees did everything possible to derail the growth of Christianity. AND the Romans spent the 250+ years between Christ's death and Contantine's "vision" KILLING Christians. 2. Manuscripts, at the least, have lasted through... -the Roman destruction of Israel & other wars in the Middle East of the 1st / 2nd Century -the 250+ years of Roman persecution of Christians and Hebrews that began with Nero -the "trinitarian" changes made to the Bible beginning around Tertullian's time -the invasions / expansion of Islam that began after Muhammad's death in 632 AD Folks expect that Jesus' miracles to be recorded in a pile of ancient tabloid journals somewhere? Even the Christ-hating Pharisees mention Jesus in the Talmud. Even IF we didn't have manuscript fragments dating back to the 1st century, scholars could "piece together" the 4 Gospels just from the writings of various church fathers. ---AD 96 Clement Bishop of Rome quotes / refers to 11 books used for the New Testament including Matthew, Mark and Luke. ---AD 108 Ignatius Bishop of Antioch quotes / refers to 24 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. ---AD 110 Polycarp Bishop of Smyrna quotes / refers to 18 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. On TOP of that, there is a growing consensus that the first writings of the Gospels were in Hebrew & Aramaic. Great post, except no "trinitarian" changes were made to the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity was already in Sacred Scripture and was just made the official belief of Christianity at a Church council around Tertullian's time. The apostles knew about the Trinity from the moment the Holy Spirit descended on Pentecost. |
Servant-of-the-LORD
User ID: 79070217 United States 06/25/2020 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great post, except no "trinitarian" changes were made to the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity was already in Sacred Scripture and was just made the official belief of Christianity at a Church council around Tertullian's time. The apostles knew about the Trinity from the moment the Holy Spirit descended on Pentecost. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67437617 Really? 1 John 5:7 (KJV version) IS NOT in the the oldest manuscripts. "Godhead"? The 3 "godhead" verses found in the KJV are either altered verses or mistranslated. Most newer translations don't use the word. The trinity "concept" isn't actually in the Bible. Matthew 28:18 is counter to 7 other verses in the NT concerning baptism "in Jesus' name". I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67437617 United States 06/25/2020 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great post, except no "trinitarian" changes were made to the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity was already in Sacred Scripture and was just made the official belief of Christianity at a Church council around Tertullian's time. The apostles knew about the Trinity from the moment the Holy Spirit descended on Pentecost. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67437617 Really? 1 John 5:7 (KJV version) IS NOT in the the oldest manuscripts. "Godhead"? The 3 "godhead" verses found in the KJV are either altered verses or mistranslated. Most newer translations don't use the word. The trinity "concept" isn't actually in the Bible. Matthew 28:18 is counter to 7 other verses in the NT concerning baptism "in Jesus' name". Sorry, I shouldn't have started an argument. Your post was good. I think it's made pretty clear in the first verse of John though. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." And then a few verses later John says "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us." That's how I see it at least. |
Servant-of-the-LORD
User ID: 79072268 United States 06/25/2020 12:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great post, except no "trinitarian" changes were made to the Bible. The doctrine of the Trinity was already in Sacred Scripture and was just made the official belief of Christianity at a Church council around Tertullian's time. The apostles knew about the Trinity from the moment the Holy Spirit descended on Pentecost. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 67437617 Really? 1 John 5:7 (KJV version) IS NOT in the the oldest manuscripts. "Godhead"? The 3 "godhead" verses found in the KJV are either altered verses or mistranslated. Most newer translations don't use the word. The trinity "concept" isn't actually in the Bible. Matthew 28:18 is counter to 7 other verses in the NT concerning baptism "in Jesus' name". Sorry, I shouldn't have started an argument. Your post was good. I think it's made pretty clear in the first verse of John though. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." And then a few verses later John says "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us." That's how I see it at least. No need to apologize. God Himself didn't become "flesh". He SENT His Son. The fact remains though that the "trinity" doctrine overlooks SEVERAL key verses said by Jesus Himself. Thread: Son of God - Jesus' Relationship To The Father - John 17 and More - Bible Study I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58396679 United States 07/05/2020 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78060136 United States 07/05/2020 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78255182 Mexico 07/05/2020 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FIRST CENTURY ROMAN PAGANS WROTE "THE GOSPEL" Here's a bit of history and a "theory" ?!? Quoting: Servant-of-the-LORD The filioque was added to the Nicene Creed at the Council of Toledo in 589. It was basically the FULL beginning of the "God the Son" trinity. [link to episcopalchurch.org (secure)] Guess what Christian "teaching" is MOST despised by Muslims? The "trinity". Ironic too that Islam was started just a few decades AFTER the Council of Trent made the filioque change. What are the odds that Father God actually SENT Gabriel to Muhammed to keep the "Jesus is God" nonsense in check? Meaning, possibly that Jesus (Joshua, with a "y" in Hebrew) was just this )ewish guy who maybe was a healer, maybe a bit psychic and knew things, tried to organize his )ewish people to uprise against the filthy beastly pagan roman occupiers of his country, had a following, prayed to God for help, got sent to the gallows by the romans but his following of )ews wouldn't let up so the romans set up a false religion in his name, insisting that the )ews must "turn the other cheek" and not attack them, then setting up a false codex with many different conflicting stories about this fake prophet's life, that millions of christians follow today and totally blame the )ews for his death (see hitler @ oberrmmergau "passion play," 1934, reason for the slaughter of 6 million out of 8 million european )ews, WWII) and the story of idiotic human-god worship continues. Nope. I don't buy that garbage. The Romans didn't "create" a religion. Manuscript fragments of the New Testament date back to the late First Century AD. There's more ancient manuscript evidence for Jesus than ANY other ancient person. You blabber of "the lack of contemporary evidence" knowing FULL WELL that.... 1. Starting after Jesus' death, the Pharisees did everything possible to derail the growth of Christianity. AND the Romans spent the 250+ years between Christ's death and Contantine's "vision" KILLING Christians. 2. Manuscripts, at the least, have lasted through... -the Roman destruction of Israel & other wars in the Middle East of the 1st / 2nd Century -the 250+ years of Roman persecution of Christians and Hebrews that began with Nero -the "trinitarian" changes made to the Bible beginning around Tertullian's time -the invasions / expansion of Islam that began after Muhammad's death in 632 AD Folks expect that Jesus' miracles to be recorded in a pile of ancient tabloid journals somewhere? Even the Christ-hating Pharisees mention Jesus in the Talmud. Even IF we didn't have manuscript fragments dating back to the 1st century, scholars could "piece together" the 4 Gospels just from the writings of various church fathers. ---AD 96 Clement Bishop of Rome quotes / refers to 11 books used for the New Testament including Matthew, Mark and Luke. ---AD 108 Ignatius Bishop of Antioch quotes / refers to 24 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. ---AD 110 Polycarp Bishop of Smyrna quotes / refers to 18 books used for the New Testament including all 4 Gospels. On TOP of that, there is a growing consensus that the first writings of the Gospels were in Hebrew & Aramaic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75482229 United States 07/05/2020 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75852581 United States 07/05/2020 08:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79012979 New Zealand 07/05/2020 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78498959 Luxembourg 07/05/2020 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50811052 United States 07/05/2020 09:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59095957 United States 07/05/2020 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 59095957 United States 07/05/2020 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77756248 United States 07/05/2020 10:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fist in the Box
User ID: 71052345 United States 07/05/2020 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Judges 8:20-22 English Standard Version (ESV) 20 So he said to Jether his firstborn, “Rise and kill them!” But the young man did not draw his sword, for he was afraid, because he was still a young man. 21 Then Zebah and Zalmunna said, “Rise yourself and fall upon us, for as the man is, so is his strength.” And Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna, and he took the crescent ornaments that were on the necks of their camels. Gideon's Ephod 22 Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, “Rule over us, you and your son and your grandson also, for you have saved us from the hand of Midian.” |
jlee2027
User ID: 76568830 United States 07/05/2020 11:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1300 years ago the Popes never left Rome, you couldn't travel to Mecca, it took a month. Yet, by some magical means the Pope made Mohammed make a religion .... and start Holy Wars. Yeah, right. The devil created Islam and now because he hates the ONE TRUE CHURCH (there is no other), the same devil tries to blame the Church. Laughable really. And some of you actually believe this! Pathetic |
Scribbler
User ID: 78019416 United States 07/06/2020 12:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78223924 United States 07/06/2020 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77732153 United States 07/06/2020 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fist in the Box
User ID: 71052345 United States 07/06/2020 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78223924 United States 07/06/2020 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77732153 United States 07/06/2020 12:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This thread is ridiculous. The Catholic Church did not create islam. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77732153 catholic satanist SHILL! Prayers m not catholic. I’m certainly not satanist. I am a Christian. That said the catholic hatred on this site needs to stop. The Catholic Church is wrong about some things but they aren’t “satanic”. They certainly did NOT create islam. Islam is the greatest deception in history and satan’s greatest victory-making all those poor lost souls think they are following God’s will. Everyone who believes in Christ as the Savior is on the same team. Stop with this hatred. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77876249 United States 07/06/2020 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hamlet's Mill
User ID: 73071279 United States 07/06/2020 01:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78157050 United States 07/06/2020 01:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Christian Fighter
User ID: 79114816 Brazil 07/06/2020 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jlee2027
User ID: 76568830 United States 07/06/2020 02:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Catholics are satanists. There is nothing about them that is Christian at all. All of the secret societies emanate from the vatican. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78223924 Catholics that do not repent will burn in hell for eternity. That would be the opposite of truth. There is only one church and one path to Heaven and that is through the ONE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH - the Catholic Church. It was the Protest (nice name) ants - (Protestants) who left the Church in the 1500's and made up new religions, new methods, new beliefs, and new churches. None of them can forgive sin, none of them actually have a real Eucharist, and all of them are Satanic counterfeits designed to fool people and lead them away from the truth. Just because Francis is an anti-Pope (the prophets told us an anti-Pope would come) and Rome is full of heretics who are not true Catholics, does not mean the religion is false. It means the faithful are being tested and purified. The Next Pope will be the greatest in history. Count on that. Last Edited by jlee2027 on 07/06/2020 02:11 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78157050 United States 07/06/2020 02:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |