BREAKING: WikiLeaks: QAnon Likely a LARP (Like Action Role Play)

Between the two extreme positions regarding Q, there is a middle possibility:

Q is associated with the Trump team, but is merely a cheerleader. He (actually a small team) has been given some information, primarily about past events. He then continually projects a rosy future of victory after victory, culminating in a glorious military parade on November 11 after achieving a filibuster-proof majority in both houses of Congress.

It's an inspiring vision, but no more than that: a vision, not a logical prognostication or even a coherent plan. Indeed, Q's posts are disturbingly similar to the incessant "messages from Heaven" posted by alleged seers who claim to have visions of the Virgin Mary.

Q's popularity dropped significantly at the end of April, for three sound reasons:

1) President Trump entirely reneged on his promise to release the JFK assassination files (which most of us believe would implicate many organizations and individuals who were in the US government, from the CIA to the military). The files, which were scheduled for release at the end of April, will now be kept secret until the next Presidential term--i.e., the 12th of Never. Q, who had previously expressed great devotion to JFK--treating him as a saint and martyr and even composing a prayer for his intercession!--neglected even to mention the President's shocking reversal, much less explain it.

At the very least, this indicates that the President will never expose a crime that even peripherally implicates his best friend the military--not 9/11, not the use of a neutron bomb at the Battle of Baghdad Airport in 2003, and not even the JFK assassination 55 years ago.

2) At the beginning of April, Q promised several specific developments for that month--e.g., the Inspector General's full report, the exoneration of Michael Flynn. None of them occurred--and indeed, none have taken place this month either. But the most important of these was a major authoritative report on vote fraud that would force an election integrity law through Congress in time for the mid-term elections. Sadly, it is now too late. Even if such a report miraculously appeared tomorrow, and even if Congress miraculously defeated a filibuster to pass a bill to effectively eliminate vote fraud, the courts would now strke down any such law, on the grounds that it is too late in the cycle to change the rules for this election.

As a result, spiraling Democrat vote fraud will ensure that the Republicans lose at least the House, and perhaps also the Senate. By 2020, Democrats will have solidified a nationwide fraud machine akin to that Chicagoans have suffered for 85 years. Thenceforth, Republicans will never win another national election.

3) President Trump's recent nominees--Gina Haspel the CIA torturer, and John Bolton the neocon warmonger--are clearly meant to signal "making peace" with the Deep State (CIA) and the Bush family (neocons).

As of today, May 29, none of the Washington criminals have been indicted or arrested--not Hillary, not Obama, not George HW Bush, not even poster child Andrew McCabe, who is a low-level functionary compared to the others. And yet, Q tells us repeatedly to "Trust Sessions" and "Trust Wray."

Last Edited by BeSkeptical on 05/29/2018 04:02 PM

WikiLeaks has been appropriated by bad actors.

Trust Assange not WikiLeaks.

Wikileaks was purchased by the DNC, JA is no longer associated w/ wikileaks.

How about linking your plagiarized wall of text.

Sounds like Marxist garbage from the Palmer Report.

You cheap shot, motherfucker.

Eat shit and die.

Sounds about right.

JA would have no reason to start a pissing contest with Q, especially since Q affirms JA as one of the good guys.

More co intel. Amazing all the fire power directed against a "Larp."

"Wikileaks was purchased by the DNC"

"Sounds about right."

Let me guess: you consider yourself to not be gullible and easily fooled?



Very hard to see how Q won you over with your steely skepticism.



What's next?
"Wikileaks was purchased by aliens"
"Sounds about right."

I wrote the post myself, and it expresses my own thoughts. Unless you are referring to the fact that I have posted similar text in similarly-titled threads a couple of times this month?

I don't know anything about a Palmer Report, and I am most certainly not a Marxist. Here's a hint: I'm a devout Catholic who will never forget the treachery of his assassination, nor the subsequent coverup (55 years going on 100).

Here's another hint: I am a member of the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. I will never forget the treachery of 9/11 conspirators Cheney and Rumsfeld, nor the coverup (now approaching 17 years).

Amazing that you have nothing to say in defense of the recent Q. But thanks for bumping the thread.

Last Edited by BeSkeptical on 05/29/2018 06:56 PM