REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
CARBON DATING, the gold standard in archeological dating, IS FOUND TO BE INACCURATE. Timescale of Human Evolution/History must be revised
|
Poster Handle
|
Layers of Reality |
Post Content
|
carbon dating is only used for dating organic matter. it is only used for things younger than 50,000-70,000 years old. They do not use carbon dating on anything older than that because they know it does not work on things older than that.
Quoting: Kakarot False! [ link to www.thedailybeast.com (secure)] They have not stopped measuring dates using radioactive carbon at all. Quoting: Layers of Reality where does it say they used carbon dating? Quoting: Ostria1 My apologies. Several dating techniques were used, and all came back with a date range between 200,000 and 400,000 years old. I misread a word as 'carbon' in the article so this wasn't the best of examples, but it doesnt negate the fact scietnists are still going public about the inaccuracy of carbon dating, which is the entire reason this post exists. 'OP is wrong because the scientists are wrong' is about the vibe I'm getting from those choosing to refuse any form of acceptance or agreement on what was being conveyed. Even though the premise of this post is exactly in line with what you guys are saying. Lol. 'I dont like how you came to your conclusion so I'm just going to act like you're wrong' They used thermoluminescence (TL) and electron spin resonance (ESR) in addition to Uranium/Thorium dating.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|