REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
CARBON DATING, the gold standard in archeological dating, IS FOUND TO BE INACCURATE. Timescale of Human Evolution/History must be revised
|
Poster Handle
|
Layers of Reality |
Post Content
|
You thought they only used carbon dating for everything otherwise you wouldn't have added "And here we see some disbelief that carbon dating could be accurate when measuring dates OVER 30,000 years as a result of the ratio of atmospheric radioactive carbon to nonradioactive carbon has not remaining consistent over time."
Quoting: Kakarot I said thats the only thing they use? Can you respond to this comment with my quoted message that says exactly what you said I said? You are literally adding 1 and 1 together and making 15 out of it lol. You're leaping to conclusions and using assumptions rather than unbiasedly looking at the information supplied and responding only to that. This just isnt' that big of a deal for you to be so concerned about, but if you want to show concern, try to be concerned about the information given....instead of being concerned about your personal assumptions about that data.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|