...
The evidence to support that there is no life after death is very simple. Its not observable, measurable or even probable.
Look at these two statements:
- I don't think that god exists
- I think that god doesn't exist
Can you spot the difference between them?
Quoting: MaybeTrollingU My dream of a red pony is not observable, measurable, or even probable, and you cannot falsify my claim. Yet you do not question that claim. Why?
Simply because a dream is not reality, its nothing than your brain doing what it is supposed to do. But if you said you have a red pony in your closet, then it would be observable. Its like saying "I'm thinking about a lake right now", of course its not possible to measure or observe this it is only in my mind. But when I say: I know a being that created all lakes and oceans in this world, then you have the burden of proof.
My red pony isn't reality? How can you even say that when you know exactly what I am talking about and didn't challenge it on any level? Are you saying you blindly believe in unreality to the point of not even questioning it? Interesting.
As for your saying it is nothing more than my brain doing what it is supposed to do, this is an
ignorant* comment based on nothing more than your received belief that science has this stuff all figured out. If you think science understands why we dream, you are sadly mistaken.
Regardless, you keep dodging the point. Although the strong claim of yolo is the de facto belief of materialistic atheism, it is absolutely unsupportable by logic or reason. It doesn't even have any anecdotal evidence to support it. It is merely a claim made out of the air with no underlying support whatsoever.
It doesn't matter what anyone else thinks about the afterlife or whether they can support it. The point is that far from being guided by reason, logic, and evidence as they claim, atheists are just as faith based as anyone else.
And, as you are showing most wonderfully, when presented with arguments that challenge their cherished beliefs, instead of countering with reason, logic, or evidence, they will simply slide by those arguments just like so many religionists do.
