Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,270 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 654,887
Pageviews Today: 1,142,413Threads Today: 480Posts Today: 8,055
01:44 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Texas: Flyers laced with FENTANYL placed on windshield of several patrol cars
Poster Handle ILuvLearnin&Nrg
Post Content
One police sergeant being treated after touching one of the flyers:

[link to www.whio.com (secure)]
 Quoting: P. Grasshopper


Harris county sheriffs recruitment office thay have got to have cameras there.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54477261


There are most likely dash cams on the cruisers... they should have no trouble identifying who placed the flyers.

The contents of the flyers might appear to be legitimate, and due to their nature and circumstance, would invite a reaction.

If you go around revealing classified information, expect trouble, and of course the narrative surrounding this trouble may need to be manufactured to mitigate further leaks.

Just saying.

I think if most people looked at the flyer (links were provided somewhere above) the messages and conversation here would be going differently. The organization they tie back to appears to be well organized and has at least some amount of funding.

I think its safe to say no one from Targeted Justice is responsible. Given that the flyers are intended to be informative/beneficial to LEOs, its seems the likely possibilities are:

1. Lone wolf(s), using poisoned bait (Wow, cold-blooded. Also not practical. Why not just put the poison on the car door handle?)

2. Placed by good actors, but unwittingly tainted beforehand (unlikely since good actors could be accidentally poisoned) or tainted after placement (dash cam would also reveal this, so unlikely)

3. There was no poison, or it was planted after the fact.(No one is left feeling very guilty ie. this scenario requires the least extreme deviation from expected human behavior)

So option 1/2 (evil person who will likely have been caught on camera and dealt with swiftly)

Or option 3 (morally questionable person willing to lie to do what they are told, or otherwise believe is right (and is likely getting taken advantage of))

Is it getting obvious yet? I wouldn't know, I'm a simple fool. And all of this ^ was nothing but a foolish analysis.

yoda
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP