Which is better ? Hair follicle test or pee test ? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63658239 United States 07/15/2018 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She is a meth addict. She ruins people’s lives and she is a very toxic human being. Don’t believe any of her bullshit she is trying to feed to you. Oh and let’s not forget she is a person with multiple personalities, and a schizo who isn’t taking her meds. She is 39 years old and was dating a 19 year. Mind you she has kids of her own that want nothing to do with her that are 17, 18, and 21. So that should pretty much tell you what a piece of work she is. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76733362 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63658239 United States 07/15/2018 09:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I understand correctly, OP is not concerned with passing a drug test but having a drug screening done to prove she doesn't use meth or other illicit substances (excluding cannabis)... So she's looking for the more comprehensive drug test to show a longer history of non-use (of those other substances)... Quoting: WOLF* Quite an astute observation, WOLF, and I concur with your deduction. What would you prescribe for this situation? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76734165 United States 07/15/2018 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I understand correctly, OP is not concerned with passing a drug test but having a drug screening done to prove she doesn't use meth or other illicit substances (excluding cannabis)... So she's looking for the more comprehensive drug test to show a longer history of non-use (of those other substances)... Quoting: WOLF* Quite an astute observation, WOLF, and I concur with your deduction. What would you prescribe for this situation? Polygraph Exam! As far as I've read, some of the more/most harmful and debilitating substances get metabolized very quickly by the human body and therefore they can only be detected for a very limited period of time (few days) after discontinuation of use... That's why drug screenings for employment are ineffective and in ways a joke - because candidates who abuse alcohol will not be identified, nor will individuals who use/abuse harder substances who simply discontinued their use for several days before their drug test. Those pre-employment drug screenings largely target and exclude candidates who use cannabis - while failing to identify and exclude most candidates using the actual harmful and debilitating substances (alcohol, heroin, meth, crack/coke, etc)... I would imagine only a rather small minority demographc would consist of those stupid enough to continue using those more dangerous illicit substances in the days leading up to the drug test (and I agree with the screening in that context)... So if someone handed you a drug test to 'prove' that they weren't hard drug user, and you knew about how fast some of those substances get metabolized and become undetectable - you wouldn't place much emphasis on the results of that test... Especially not if the person planned it themselves and therefore could have wilfully abstained from ingesting anything that would have triggered a positive test... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76733362 United States 07/16/2018 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
something something User ID: 75555655 United Kingdom 07/16/2018 07:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Meth will be undetectable shortly after use in a urine test whereas pot will be in the urine for 1 month or so. Quoting: Anton Chigurh Hair Follicle test will show repeated use of anything over the last 90 days but will not show a single use over that time span unless a large amount was ingested. BS. Keep the bladder flushed and you're golden. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75909914 United States 07/17/2018 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |