NY Times: Whiteness of New Hampshire is Offensive

THE NEW YORK TIMES HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN.

the rich libs have two traits---guilt and fear


guilt from unmerited wealth and power



fear that the minority classes, according to them, will seek to force them to share that wealth



the libs believe that by being "sympathetic" to these groups they will be excused from this threat


>>>>how about really helping the less fortunate to help themselves...what a novel idea

Never happen. Libs rig and stack the deck to protect their own interests. They don't realize they're the center of the sandwich. Despised by those they say they help and despised by their unseen masters who know what petty little ants they are.

We're a problem apparently. Working, obeying the laws, trying to raise a family of decent, productive people is just wrong. We need people that don't understand English.

Isn't it racist to bring up skin color as a reason to be offended?

First, they would have to be intelligent enough to know that racist means judging someone by their color.

They currently believe racist is what you should judge someone to be if they are a particular color.

They're not very bright. Kind of makes me want to nuke the whole thing from orbit and start over again.

They would never dare say that about the blackness of Detroit.

And Sarah Jeong strikes.

[link to www.foxnews.com]

The NYT needs to go out of business and soon. It is nothing more than a communist propaganda outlet.

Your gonna see a lot more of that coming out of NY Times now that they hired that Racist white hater Sarah.

That's their definition of White Supremacy. We're literally Hitler.

What would minorities see in New Hampshire anyway? A stuffy New England network of close knit small towns. How would they fit in? Immigrants want a show and the gibs. New Hampshire is staunch. Nothing will come of this, unless the boomers die and leaves the state depopulated much like Rhode Island.