| Users Online Now: 1,381 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 175,151 | |
| Pageviews Today: 292,679 | Threads Today: 109 | Posts Today: 2,004 |
| 03:02 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,381 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 175,151 | |
| Pageviews Today: 292,679 | Threads Today: 109 | Posts Today: 2,004 |
| 03:02 AM | ||
OMG. Ford will NOT testify ever. | |
simplify
 User ID: 75394427  Canada09/21/2018 10:22 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 39723407  United States09/21/2018 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Strange no current pics of her. Quoting: abeliever Trump needs to demand a picture of her and live imaging to prove she exists.   I KNEW IT!!!!!!! "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
| simplify
User ID: 75394427 Canada09/21/2018 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wait a minute here folks.......remember how she doesn't want to be in the room testifying in the presence of Mr, Kavanaugh & they seem to have agreed to that. Now how will Kavanaugh even know that she showed up or not? Is that why they don't want Kavanaugh in the same room with her, maybe because she really doesn't exist at all? Holy crap, if that's what's going on here? Quoting: simplify Are they going to hypnotize the Committee? THEY would certainly need to see her in order to ask their questions, right? from what I read there are only going to be 2 people interviewing her. How do we know that these 2 people are not in on the scam? |
| Paul Drake
User ID: 76937430 United States09/21/2018 10:37 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No word yet on the 10PM 21st Sept. deadline on whether she will indeed testify...... Quoting: MR.GGG Everything that I'm reading points to D E L A Y tactics so .... the way I see it whether she testifies or not and where if she does is MOOOT!! We have to look at the DELAY!! I read that Kavenaugh MUST be confirmed at least THREE DAYS before the next session of the Supreme Court and their list of cases to be reviewed. Time is running out and I believe THAT is THE plan!!! WHAT IS ON THE SCOTUS's DOCKET IN THE NEXT SESSION THAT THEY MUST KEEP A CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGE FROM PARTICIPATING IN AND / OR RULING ON ??? WE WILL FIND THE ANSWER TO THIS DEM SIDE SHOW THERE ... IMHO Great points!!!!!! This is bull. Just to delay. As long as they can. It’s obvious. It COULD be a delay until after the mid terms but I'm a paranoid old fart ... learned long ago if everybody is pointing at ONE THING the REAL story is where they don't want you too look. I just don't think they had any intention or even a HOPE of delaying until after the mids .. I think the answer/motive is in the upcoming docket. Getting ready to leave so don't have time to research these cases but here are the October cases: [link to www.supremecourt.gov (secure)] and November cases, of which the VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC. V. WARREN case sounds interesting..... [link to www.supremecourt.gov (secure)] |
| Esoterica
(OP) User ID: 55079802 United States09/21/2018 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 39723407 United States09/21/2018 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No word yet on the 10PM 21st Sept. deadline on whether she will indeed testify. I read she has set all kinds "conditions" that basically can't be met if it is going to be even quasi-judicial hearing. She said she can't fly and will need time to DRIVE to DC ... from California. The nominee committee members or a few of them offered to FLY TO HER and hear her story. UNacceptable. Quoting: MR.GGG Everything that I'm reading points to D E L A Y tactics so .... the way I see it whether she testifies or not and where if she does is MOOOT!! We have to look at the DELAY!! I read that Kavenaugh MUST be confirmed at least THREE DAYS before the next session of the Supreme Court and their list of cases to be reviewed. Time is running out and I believe THAT is THE plan!!! I have no way of looking so maybe one of you guys with friends in low places could do a bit of RESEARCH and find what I believe is THE # ONE issue here. WHAT IS ON THE SCOTUS's DOCKET IN THE NEXT SESSION THAT THEY MUST KEEP A CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGE FROM PARTICIPATING IN AND / OR RULING ON ??? WE WILL FIND THE ANSWER TO THIS DEM SIDE SHOW THERE ... IMHO This!  Well, they ARE planning on impeaching the President if they win the Midterms. A true Constitutionalist Judge would never allow this. "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
| Jungleboogie
User ID: 76648271 Canada09/21/2018 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not funny. I’m serious. Show me. I’m not buying this bulll. Something is not adding up. She's been 'scrubbed' online by Dem/Soros operatives. And I don't mean yesterday, they've obviously planned this for months. They probably have a hit job lined up for every person on Trump's judge list. Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
| Avenger1
User ID: 72252658 United States09/21/2018 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and down the rabbit hole we go? Anyone know or heard if she has kids? How old they are? Any parents or siblings for this mystery woman? There is nothing. Everything has been “scrubbed”. Smdh. Early on I read that she had two sons, pre-teen age. She's still listed on Spokeo.com under Christine Margaret Blasey with other relatives. She may even be listed under last name Ford. I didn't search that long. Last Edited by Avenger1 on 09/21/2018 11:07 PM "Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes" "When the student is ready, the teacher will appear" |
| Eggcellently Deplorable
Re-Instate Smith-Mundt! User ID: 39723407 United States09/21/2018 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok and this is crazy. Never seen this. If you load the stanford link into wayback machine it shows you her details as the page is loading and once it loads they disappear. They have gotten wayback machine to tinker this page. Quoting: Bret Kavanaugh [link to web.archive.org (secure)] I smell some of the alphabet agencies' hand in this. It's too fast, too thorough and too clean. Her Father WAS/IS a spook (is there ever a "was" where spooks are concerned? "I have come to the conclusion that all news should be treated like 9/11, assume it is a psyop with actors participating in a staged event complete with props, until proven otherwise, in which case assume whatever is being recorded, reported, televised, is distortions/lying by omission/outright lies, until proven otherwise." - Anonymous, 4-13-12 |
| Avenger1
User ID: 72252658 United States09/21/2018 11:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok and this is crazy. Never seen this. If you load the stanford link into wayback machine it shows you her details as the page is loading and once it loads they disappear. They have gotten wayback machine to tinker this page. Quoting: Bret Kavanaugh [link to web.archive.org (secure)] I smell some of the alphabet agencies' hand in this. It's too fast, too thorough and too clean. Her Father WAS/IS a spook (is there ever a "was" where spooks are concerned? Ha. Once a spook, always a spook. "Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes" "When the student is ready, the teacher will appear" |
| Bret Kavanaugh
User ID: 76652894 United States09/21/2018 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| 3643297
User ID: 76832232 United States09/21/2018 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This just hit me. The ONLY photo they have been showing of her is the smiling one, you’ve seen it. But, again, that’s the ONLY PHOTO of her. Quoting: Esoterica Where are her professional photos? She is a psych Dr, correct? I have never, ever known a ph Dr to not have pro photos. Where are they? Where is her practice? Current professional business photos? Show me ONE Dr., especially a psych Dr., in a reputable practice that does NOT have a corresponding photo and bio. Something is fucky here. I agree. And for the life of me, I swear I’ve seen that photo somewhere before - well before this charade. Can’t remember where or when, but I feel that it’s been used somewhere else before. Anyone else? She looks like Nancy Lanza. Yes! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 65696503 United States09/21/2018 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | and down the rabbit hole we go? Anyone know or heard if she has kids? How old they are? Any parents or siblings for this mystery woman? There is nothing. Everything has been “scrubbed”. Smdh. Early on I read that she had two sons, pre-teen age. She's still listed on Spokeo.com under Christine Margaret Blasey with other relatives. She may even be listed under last name Ford. I didn't search that long. Sooooooo There is an "M" involved in her name..... |
| BeSkeptical
User ID: 46420627 United States09/21/2018 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Moppie
User ID: 74516659 United States09/21/2018 11:40 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not funny. I’m serious. Show me. I’m not buying this bulll. Something is not adding up. She's been 'scrubbed' online by Dem/Soros operatives. And I don't mean yesterday, they've obviously planned this for months. They probably have a hit job lined up for every person on Trump's judge list. They are the true experts, they made Hussein’s birth certificate disappear too. These people are pros. |
