Haha, world was gonna end in 12 years (climate, warmists, Ocasio)

The truth:
And, watch this video about what those climate graphs actually show, they show ANOMALIES.
The data itself just shows very very much the same temperatures.
At3:50minutes



(the warmists of course call everyone that does not agree with their hype for crooks and criminals)

Last Edited by Northlights on 01/22/2019 05:38 PM

that woman is so damn dumb its scary.

if this is an indication of the state of US colleges

this nation is screwed.

But she gets a lot of attention

[link to wattsupwiththat.com (secure)]

"Exasperated Democrats try to rein in Ocasio-Cortez

The effort is part carrot, part stick. But it’s far from clear the anti-establishment political novice can be made to play ball.

By RACHAEL BADE and HEATHER CAYGLE 01/11/2019 05:03 AM EST

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is already making enemies in the House Democratic Caucus — and some of its members are mounting an operation to bring the anti-establishment, democratic socialist with 2.2 million Twitter followers into the fold."

way less than 50

Last Edited by Northlights on 01/22/2019 05:59 PM

[link to wattsupwiththat.com (secure)]

"Does the IPCC say we have until 2030 to avoid catastrophic global warming?
charles the moderator / 1 week ago January 12, 2019
From Patrick T. Brown, PhD’s blog

Posted on January 4, 2019 by ptbrown31

In late 2018 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report on the impacts associated with global warming of 1.5°C (2.7°F) above preindustrial levels (as of 2019 we are at about 1.0°C above pre-industrial levels) as well as the technical feasibility of limiting global warming to such a level. The media coverage of the report immediately produced a meme that continues to persist. The meme is some kind of variation of the following:

The IPCC concluded that we have until 2030 (or 12 years) to avoid catastrophic global warming"

way less than 50

From the same source:

"However, I do not believe that changes in arctic sea ice extent and marginal changes in damages from forest fires (or droughts, floods etc.) are what most people envision when they think of the word catastrophic in this context. I believe that the imagery evoked in most peoples’ minds is much more at the scale of a global apocalyptic event. This idea is exemplified in Michael Barbaro’s question about the IPCC report that he asked on The New York Times’ The Daily:

“If we overshoot, if we blow past 1.5°C and 2°C degree warming, is it possible at that point that we’ve lost so much infrastructure, so much of the personnel and the resources required to fix this that it can’t be done anymore? Will there be enough of the world left to implement this in a way that could be effective?”

-Michael Barbaro, New York Times, The Daily, 10/19/2018"

way less than 50

This is from 2013, where they cite a report from the other side, the NIPCC or the Heartland Institute. The warmists of course bash the non-warmists
[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com (secure)]

There will be a long winter since the Chinese almanac has a missing spring this year since new year falls after Feb 4th

Some month earlier it was 18 EIGHTEEN years.

Yikes, they keep making their claims more and more extreme.

"Can Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Save the Planet?

Democrats lack an organized plan to stop global warming. Climate scientists say the newcomer has the beginnings of a good one.

By EMILY ATKIN
July 4, 2018

Progressives have been practically leaping for joy since 28-year-I paint my fingernailsf-described democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won her primary election for Congress last week, an outcome that CNN called “the most shocking upset of a rollicking political season.” But perhaps no group has been more excited than environmentalists. In a political environment where even her fellow Democrats often stay vague on climate change, Ocasio-Cortez has been specific and blunt in talking about the global warming crisis. She also has a plan to fight that crisis—one to transition the United States to a 100-percent renewable energy system by 2035.

…

Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that aggressive action is needed to stave off the violent storms, rising seas, and debilitating droughts projected to worsen as the climate warms. Avoiding that means the earth’s average temperature can’t rise more than 2 degrees Celsius above where it was in the year 1880. Unfortunately, we’re already nearly there; as The Guardian’s Carbon Countdown Clock shows, humans can only emit greenhouse gases at our current rate for another 18"

way less than 50

from Can Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Save the Planet?

[link to wattsupwiththat.com (secure)]

Last Edited by Northlights on 01/23/2019 11:12 AM

The woman is brilliant, also an archetype. (AOC = 103)

Smart fuckers tend to appear as dumb fucker to stupid fuckers.

The magic of demystifying the manufactured hypercomplexity of politics

Y'LL SEE.

Energy prices in Australia have become super high, plus brownouts so old people die in the heat
[link to endtimesherald.com (secure)]

all fools... the world will not end... maybe humanity... but the world rocks on.

To avoid catastrophic global warming probably we must stop everything now and plant a lot of forests.Impossible and we are beyond the tipping point.

It has been warming since the last maunder minimum , this is natural. Nothing alarming . I see you did not read one thing I posted
Check this graph
[link to i1.wp.com (secure)]

Last Edited by Northlights on 01/26/2019 05:12 PM

no 97% consensus , that was proven a lie anyway

alligators let themselves freeze with their nose above the ice
[link to wcti12.com (secure)]

BINGO! And Occasional Vortex can go pound sand....

[link to americanelephant.wordpress.com (secure)]
Alarm alarm the ocean is rising. Not
Now they are gooa grab the whole coastline, relocate roads, power plants, beach front properties

They are running UK power plants with US wood pellets now, costing a huge amount of subsidies
[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

I thought this was poor sarcasm at first but i fear not lol.
She IS popular though, esp with younger people and so she is dangerous - to both the right AND the left

Last Edited by curry nosher on 01/26/2019 08:19 PM

She went to an expensive college. She most likely is not stupid .

Any scientists here?
I read this paper discussed here now has debunked the GREENHOUSE EFFECT theory and proven how the atmosphere heats the earth, it is by pressure. (you compress any gas, and it gets hot. Just like a Diesel engine

"In conclusion, the “radiative Greenhouse effect” does not exist. The atmosphere warms the surface thermodynamically through a form of adiabatic compression that only depends on total pressure. Adiabatic processes, although well understood in classical Thermodynamics, are not part of the current climate theory, which focuses almost exclusively on diabatic radiative processes. As a result of this conceptual bias, climate-science classes taught at Universities do not properly explain the direct effect of pressure as a force on the temperature of thermodynamic systems. Instead, pressure is only discussed as a factor affecting the atmospheric IR optical depth assumed to control surface temperature through a purported “trapping” of radiant heat, which is not observed in the open, convective atmosphere."

way less than 50

from [link to tallbloke.wordpress.com (secure)]

More science, the cosmic rays climate link

Here the paper on that the greenhouse effect with CO2 etc does not exist, but that it is actually the pressurized gases that heat the earth

[link to www.omicsonline.org (secure)]


"Keywords: Greenhouse effect; Emergent model; Planetary temperature; Atmospheric pressure; Greenhouse gas; Mars temperature
Introduction
In a recent study Volokin and ReLlez [1] demonstrated that the strength of Earth’s atmospheric Greenhouse Effect (GE) is about 90 K instead of 33 K as presently assumed by most researchers [2-7]. The new estimate corrected a long-standing mathematical error in the application of the Stefan–Boltzmann (SB) radiation law to a sphere pertaining to Hölder’s inequality between integrals. Since the current greenhouse theory strives to explain GE solely through a retention (trapping) of outgoing long-wavelength (LW) radiation by atmospheric gases [2,5,7- 10], a thermal enhancement of 90 K creates a logical conundrum, since satellite observations constrain the global atmospheric LW absorption to 155–158 W m-2 [11-13]. Such a flux might only explain a surface warming up to 35 K. Hence, more than 60% of Earth’s 90 K atmospheric effect appears to remain inexplicable in the context of the current theory. Furthermore, satellite- and surface-based radiation measurements have shown [12-14] that the lower troposphere emits 42-44% more radiation towards the surface (i.e. 341-346 W m-2) than the net shortwave flux delivered to the Earth-atmosphere system by the Sun (i.e. 240 W m-2). In other words, the lower troposphere contains significantly more kinetic energy than expected from solar heating alone, a conclusion also supported by the new 90 K GE estimate. A similar but more extreme situation is observed on Venus as well, where the atmospheric down- welling LW radiation near the surface (>15,000 W m-2) exceeds the total absorbed solar flux (65–150 W m-2) by a factor of 100 or more [6]. The radiative greenhouse theory cannot explain this apparent paradox considering the fact that infrared-absorbing gases such as CO2, water....."

On copyright: This is an open access paper they want distributed as long as we provide the source

Last Edited by Northlights on 01/27/2019 06:23 AM

+1^^

green inc^^

The public toilet is an idiot and only a bigger goomer would think that because they want to hump it, it has any other value. She doesn't. She was only so ny could kill live infants by injecting a labor blocker and chopping it out.
Too stupid to live and a laugh of an insult to watch. Her and her voters.


The English and french leaders must use freezing as a tactic? Centuries and they can't ever get "oil" right....

That pic cracks me up every time!

:magalol: