No not at all. What I was referring to was the fact that most critics focus in on that secret societies and all that take an oath of secrecy/allegiance, etc. My point is that if you stop and think, any close knit organization usually has something similar. Oaths, creeds, non disclosure agreements...all those things. Its all the same. That in mind, they will then say, did you take an oath as some sort of litmus test to then like clockwork dispense their truth from a moral high ground they think they are standing on. It just gets old. But I do understand, its just they are looking in the wrong direction sadly.