Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,804 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 707,205
Pageviews Today: 1,202,635Threads Today: 454Posts Today: 8,224
01:33 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject WIKILEAKS CALLS QANON A LIKELY ‘PIED PIPER’ OPERATION
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
You can't be pro-Trump and anti-QAnon.
 Quoting: Lord of the Sheeple

False.

President Trump is a politician. To be pro-Trump, all that's required is to believe that he is preferable to his potential opponents. That's easy--his opponents are all rabidly pro-abortion.

Q is an anonymous internet poster who makes extraordinary claims of:
- Access to the highest levels of planning and decisionmaking (the Presidency)
- Access to the deepest levels of knowledge (the NSA)
- Access to the strongest levels of prosecution and punishment (Gitmo, coerced suicide).
To be pro-Q, one must therefore believe that Q has all this astonishing access, while remaining anonymous and without his posts arousing objection from those elected and appointed to hold such power and knowledge.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; and so far, the known evidence (i.e., prosecutions of Deep State criminals) is absolutely nil.
 Quoting: BeSkeptical


Here's the fatal flaw in your logic:

Trump was never a politician before running for president.

A businessman, a builder, a TV star maybe but never a Politician.

The truth is that Trump whatever you think he is, is not one of the political class and never has been.

He doesn't talk like they do.

He doesn't act like they do.

He doesn't play their games or even by their rules of order.

Trump is playing by his rules, and Q is a byproduct of those rules.

Wikileaks has this backwards, Q is a trap to trap the political class (The deep state) and not Q's followers.

Q posts are freaking them out and causing them to conspire together to get rid of Trump by any means possible.

They are the ones making the most noise.
 Quoting: Masiro®


All of what you have said above is spot on, IMO.

It would be interesting to know how many of the Q bashers have actually, really taken a close look at the Q posts and have made an honest effort to analyze the whole situation objectively and patiently. A drive-by approach simply doesn't cut it as a basis from which to form a valid opinion, as is true with any complex phenomenon.

I also think that it is likely that Wikileaks is compromised and that Julian Assange is no longer in charge there. I don't know this to be fact but when was the last time we saw a data dump like the ones we have seen in the past, such as the DNC emails, the Podesta emails and Vault 7? Instead we get a written op-ed by someone who claims to be a Wikileaks associate and who says, "I think Qnon is a Pied Piper operation..." I don't recall Assange ever offering up unsubstantiated opinion pieces in lieu of concrete, verifiable leaked data and info.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP