The Feds Are Dropping Child Porn Cases... | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77594764 United States 04/26/2019 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
dead User ID: 69540481 United Kingdom 04/26/2019 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Many problems with the "sex offender" hysteria in the US. The vast majority of actual touching of underage victims is done by a family member, close friend or church leader. Very few strangers. That is why most other first world countries reject anything that the US pushes to them about "sex offenses." The rest of the world doesnt agree. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77586719 The "sex offender" craze and list is more of a political ploy in the US than anything effective. Most people would prefer to have a murderer list or drug addict list than anything as those are often much more dangerous re offense probabilitys. Thread: By todays US sexual standards, the author, producer, director, and entire cast of "Summer of 42" would be imprisoned as "sex offenders. If I had a choice, get rape't as a kid or murdered? with would you chose? I chose murdered. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73624498 United States 04/26/2019 05:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many are set up this way for political reasons. That's the payoff. Getting rid of a troublesome person. If you are truly concerned for the children, go after those who make the films and the vice cops? and any who get hold of this stuff to harm opponents. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76664801 United States 04/26/2019 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To be honest I don’t even understand how kitty porn can constitutionally be banned from someone looking at it why can the government ban that and not any other image or information seems like a major First Amendment Violation that nobody is willing to take on |
BRIEF
User ID: 39607259 United States 04/26/2019 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BRIEF
User ID: 39607259 United States 04/26/2019 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Talisman
User ID: 77594561 United States 04/26/2019 05:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Less than 50% Quoting: It's A Secret The Department of Justice has been dismissing child pornography cases in order to not reveal information about the software programs used as the basis for the charges. Actually, they're dropping cases because they involve trump friends. . Sniff sniff. That smells like you pulled it out of your ass. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77575062 United States 04/26/2019 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To be honest I don’t even understand how kitty porn can constitutionally be banned from someone looking at it why can the government ban that and not any other image or information seems like a major First Amendment Violation that nobody is willing to take on Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76664801 Child pornography is not covered under free speech. [link to www.mtsu.edu (secure)] |
BRIEF
User ID: 39607259 United States 04/26/2019 05:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To be honest I don’t even understand how kitty porn can constitutionally be banned from someone looking at it why can the government ban that and not any other image or information seems like a major First Amendment Violation that nobody is willing to take on Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76664801 Child pornography is not covered under free speech. [link to www.mtsu.edu (secure)] Because it's abuse. I never forgive and I never forget I am a licensed firearm holder. I will, under protection of law, use lethal force if attacked. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77575062 United States 04/26/2019 05:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To be honest I don’t even understand how kitty porn can constitutionally be banned from someone looking at it why can the government ban that and not any other image or information seems like a major First Amendment Violation that nobody is willing to take on Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76664801 Child pornography is not covered under free speech. [link to www.mtsu.edu (secure)] Because it's abuse. Agreed. As far as I'm concerned the child is violated every time image/video is viewed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74457708 United States 04/26/2019 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74889763 Australia 04/26/2019 06:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77575062 United States 04/26/2019 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And what about viewing murder videos on liveleak? Why’s that legal? The answer is simple, it’s a very blatant abuse of the first amendment but it exists because nobody has the political will power to challenge it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74457708 It's been challenged all the way to the Supreme Court. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41639573 United States 04/26/2019 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77586719 United States 04/26/2019 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Less than 50% Quoting: It's A Secret The Department of Justice has been dismissing child pornography cases in order to not reveal information about the software programs used as the basis for the charges. [link to reason.com (secure)] Many problems with the "sex offender" hysteria in the US. The vast majority of actual touching of underage victims is done by a family member, close friend or church leader. Very few strangers. That is why most other first world countries reject anything that the US pushes to them about "sex offenses." The rest of the world doesnt agree. The "sex offender" craze and list is more of a political ploy in the US than anything effective. Most people would prefer to have a murderer list or drug addict list than anything as those are often much more dangerous re offense probabilitys. Thread: By todays US sexual standards, the author, producer, director, and entire cast of "Summer of 42" would be imprisoned as "sex offenders. uuuuh,we're talking about KIDDIE PORN,not unproven allegations, OK ? actual kiddie porn. regarding sex offender lists ? are you at least familiar w/their definitions usually given as a LEVEL ? why not check out how many forcible rapists are right near YOU ? or better still,those that abduct and rape- those that abduct and rape minors- regarding the feds ? obviously they are in BOTH the protection racket and participants. Agreed but sex offender lists in the US cover many more people than actual hands on rapists. Thats the problem. Once you give the government a new right to "list" and "monitor" citizens, they expand it to absurd levels and abuse. They also NEVER give back powers that they gain. A rapist/murderer/drug addict list would include MANY more actual dangerous people than the current "sex offender" lists. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77586719 United States 04/26/2019 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Discovery" is a bitch. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76780331 Yes, the Federales do plant porn on people's computers. Remember Oathkeepers in 2013? Someone, likely the Obama feds, hacked into their email accounts and sent child porn between the upper leadership of Oathkeepers. Of course. The feds can set up anyone they want to at any time with a computer file. That is why the "sex offender" laws need to be written for "hands on" offenses and not third part pictures. Too easy to transfer around third party pictures. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77095110 United States 04/26/2019 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77586719 United States 04/26/2019 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Less than 50% Quoting: It's A Secret The Department of Justice has been dismissing child pornography cases in order to not reveal information about the software programs used as the basis for the charges. [link to reason.com (secure)] I'm conflicted on this. I wouldn't want any child molested, but I don't like prosecuting and imprisoning people for a thought crime. "Collectors" that like to look at child porn, but have never or will ever molest a child are prosecuted as though they Had molested children. They are sick people, but should they be jailed for their thoughts and have their family's lives destroyed? How about just some Electric Shock aversion therapy or something? They are secondary offenders. Do you think the child porn industry would be so profitable if not for the "collectors"? But they are not tried or sentenced as "secondary." At least not in the US. Hands on abusers will abuse whether they are paid or not. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77575062 United States 04/26/2019 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Less than 50% Quoting: It's A Secret The Department of Justice has been dismissing child pornography cases in order to not reveal information about the software programs used as the basis for the charges. [link to reason.com (secure)] I'm conflicted on this. I wouldn't want any child molested, but I don't like prosecuting and imprisoning people for a thought crime. "Collectors" that like to look at child porn, but have never or will ever molest a child are prosecuted as though they Had molested children. They are sick people, but should they be jailed for their thoughts and have their family's lives destroyed? How about just some Electric Shock aversion therapy or something? They are secondary offenders. Do you think the child porn industry would be so profitable if not for the "collectors"? But they are not tried or sentenced as "secondary." At least not in the US. Hands on abusers will abuse whether they are paid or not. I believe they are usually charged with possession, which is a crime. Are you arguing that it shouldn't be? Abusers will abuse, yes. Profiteers, on the other hand, can't make money without those voyeurs. This is bigger than a couple of pedophiles taking pictures, it's a huge industry. |
The Rickest Rick Sanchez
User ID: 73168454 United States 04/26/2019 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They know who downloaded it because it was provided by the feds servers. That's what they don't want to admit to. Being the source. The universe is basically an animal. It grazes on the ordinary. It creates infinite idiots just to eat them. The Rickest Rick Sanchez comments are meant for entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to reflect the feelings and opinions, implied or expressed, of the author. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67653786 United States 04/26/2019 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Less than 50% Quoting: It's A Secret The Department of Justice has been dismissing child pornography cases in order to not reveal information about the software programs used as the basis for the charges. [link to reason.com (secure)] I'm conflicted on this. I wouldn't want any child molested, but I don't like prosecuting and imprisoning people for a thought crime. "Collectors" that like to look at child porn, but have never or will ever molest a child are prosecuted as though they Had molested children. They are sick people, but should they be jailed for their thoughts and have their family's lives destroyed? How about just some Electric Shock aversion therapy or something? OMG.. the child was victimized by the nature of the photos. The producer distributer and voyeur are all coconspirators, are all criminals. A crime was committed. Thought crimes with obscene lewd abusive tangible evidence, is crime actions. Criminal endeavor. Profiting and perving over criminal evidence!!!! GTFO with your conflict pedo lover! how the hell IS viewing kiddie potn a thought crime ? they are knowingly and actively viewing illegal content. |
Sungaze_At_Dawn
User ID: 77427246 Canada 04/26/2019 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well since there is no explanation I'll post what came to mind. That they are dropping the cases because they don't want to reveal all those FBI symbols, boy love triangles and spirals and girl love, because that would suddenly make PIZZAGATE REAL! And hurt their Democrat friends buddies and slavemasters? Last Edited by Sungaze_At_Dawn on 04/26/2019 08:00 PM The Devil tries to convince everyone he doesn't exist. The state tries to convince everyone they cannot resist. Do not go quietly into the good night. Rage Rage against the dying light! |
Mukk1234
User ID: 74421942 United States 04/26/2019 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ROSICRUCIAN1 User ID: 77567272 Canada 04/26/2019 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cosmic Charlie
User ID: 75992005 United States 04/26/2019 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76972080 United States 04/26/2019 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There seemed to be a lot of circumstantial evidence, and we are all aware that the people allegedly involved have no moral compass, to say the least. It is my deepest hope that this is being investigated quietly, and thoroughly. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77595188 Czechia 04/26/2019 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77595188 Czechia 04/26/2019 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77019011 Switzerland 04/26/2019 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | To be honest I don’t even understand how kitty porn can constitutionally be banned from someone looking at it why can the government ban that and not any other image or information seems like a major First Amendment Violation that nobody is willing to take on Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76664801 Oh, look -- a pervert. Sick that some can defend that sort of thing -- on constitutional grounds , no less |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77019011 Switzerland 04/26/2019 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |