Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,367 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 234,553
Pageviews Today: 410,886Threads Today: 208Posts Today: 2,930
04:51 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24124484
United States
06/13/2019 03:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question
^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Interesting...but total BS.

Who "taught" you that? Wigington?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30136724


^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Interesting...but total BS.

Who "taught" you that? Wigington?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30136724


Just because you are scientifically illiterate doe not make it bs.

I would be curious to see which portions you believeare not legitimate, because I have physically done this myself. Actions speak louder than words my friend and if you doubt the veracity of my statement it just means you have not taken action
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76998126
United States
06/13/2019 04:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question
^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Interesting...but total BS.

Who "taught" you that? Wigington?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30136724


^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Interesting...but total BS.

Who "taught" you that? Wigington?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30136724


Just because you are scientifically illiterate doe not make it bs.

I would be curious to see which portions you believeare not legitimate, because I have physically done this myself. Actions speak louder than words my friend and if you doubt the veracity of my statement it just means you have not taken action
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


If you believe the trails that form behind jet engines are anything but contrails, YOU are the one who is scientifically illiterate.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76998126
United States
06/13/2019 04:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question
^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Please provide citation for the highlighted claim
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73874765
United States
06/13/2019 07:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question
^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Please provide citation for the highlighted claim
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76998126


lol I can't cite myself for a non published side project we worked on in class. You and the previous poster have your mind set already so I'm not going to bother. I'm sure you understand that, unlike how polarization functions, and the quantitative aspects of light.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76998126
United States
06/14/2019 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question
^and to simplify how you can tell,
The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484


Please provide citation for the highlighted claim
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76998126


lol I can't cite myself for a non published side project we worked on in class. You and the previous poster have your mind set already so I'm not going to bother. I'm sure you understand that, unlike how polarization functions, and the quantitative aspects of light.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73874765


So, it's bullshit.

Thanks





GLP