Recent chemtrail/contrail pic with a question | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24124484 United States 06/13/2019 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Interesting...but total BS. Who "taught" you that? Wigington?! ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Interesting...but total BS. Who "taught" you that? Wigington?! Just because you are scientifically illiterate doe not make it bs. I would be curious to see which portions you believeare not legitimate, because I have physically done this myself. Actions speak louder than words my friend and if you doubt the veracity of my statement it just means you have not taken action |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76998126 United States 06/13/2019 04:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Interesting...but total BS. Who "taught" you that? Wigington?! ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Interesting...but total BS. Who "taught" you that? Wigington?! Just because you are scientifically illiterate doe not make it bs. I would be curious to see which portions you believeare not legitimate, because I have physically done this myself. Actions speak louder than words my friend and if you doubt the veracity of my statement it just means you have not taken action If you believe the trails that form behind jet engines are anything but contrails, YOU are the one who is scientifically illiterate. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76998126 United States 06/13/2019 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Please provide citation for the highlighted claim |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73874765 United States 06/13/2019 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Please provide citation for the highlighted claim lol I can't cite myself for a non published side project we worked on in class. You and the previous poster have your mind set already so I'm not going to bother. I'm sure you understand that, unlike how polarization functions, and the quantitative aspects of light. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76998126 United States 06/14/2019 05:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ^and to simplify how you can tell, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 24124484 The Lecroy wavesurfer is a high precision oscilloscope capable of converting data from a photodetector into a 2D topographical slice if you chose to do so. A rough, dim outline of clouds is visible in this manner, and it looks much like a child's drawing. Lines deemed contrails would leave an even fainter signal, since it's just an artificial thin cloud. Anything else that's up there will come back as a much stronger signal in the polarization state you are looking for, and on a heavy day, the graph looks like a bunch of dense lines. Like I said, all I know for sure is that the uv is not transmitting through water vapor, and the data indicates some other substance is present in the transmitting medium. Isolating a specific frequency, in tandem with correct polarization targeting, one can simulate a spectrometer by isolating the suspected signal, and reverse engineering what a readout should look like for a given molecule. It's the long way of going about determining atmospheric particulate content, but it's the cheapest/easiest means for the average citizen Please provide citation for the highlighted claim lol I can't cite myself for a non published side project we worked on in class. You and the previous poster have your mind set already so I'm not going to bother. I'm sure you understand that, unlike how polarization functions, and the quantitative aspects of light. So, it's bullshit. Thanks |